Those two links you cite from the index98 page are;
This page claims an energy conversion process to produce 1000% overunity,
that was why I put it in energy (guess because it is mechanical, it
should go under gravity)....
That is an interesting distinction, if a mass converts or translates
energy from inertia that can produce a force, then is it gravity or
inertia?
Doesn't inertia also occur in masses in space, where there is an absence
of gravity?
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Corridor/3664/
David Cowlishaws' page, they have at least 9 people who have built this
device or versions thereof which work as claimed;
I knew David back when the BBS was alive...he was and IS a very
enthusiastic fellow, and much to his credit, his enthusiasm has brought a
lot of attention to inertial drive principles.
At that time, I informed him of the discovery of the same principle by
Cook, Dean, Thornsen, Laithwaite, yet he still believes it to be his
alone....<g>.
Another fellow is Michael Lorrey who calls his 'the Lorrey Drive'.
Michael has a website but I don't have it offhand....he and Dave have had
some 'discussions' about precedence....<g>....nothing is TRULY new, just
rediscoveries.....Cook and Thornsen are still alive and actively
promoting their versions.
-- Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-8741 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187