Welcome to the
Telesio - Galilei Association on Scientific Truth
Home | Aims
and Objective & Disclaimer | Telesio
-
Einstein Website | News | I Discorsi
|Mission
| Board and members | Telesio-Galilei
Advisory Board | String
Theory | Bernardino
Telesio ( 1508-1588 )
Hadronic
Mechanics | Hadronic
Mathematics, Mechanics and Chemistry experimental verifications and
industrial applications | Relevant Publications
|
Telesio -
Galilei Awards | On
Einstein | Become a Member
| Links
| E-Mail
Us
Publishing an
interesting letter 2
Tuesday, 13
November 2007
----- Original Message -----
From: Science-Art Centre
To: Fucilla
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 6:17 AM
Subject: Re; Re Science-Art interaction with the University of Florence
Dear Francesco
Re; Your,"I could call you 11PM UK time Please confirm. Yes thank you,
Tuesday UK Time 11 PM.
Regards, Robert.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RE: the request for Professor Santilli to provide a brief comment on
the quantum biology work of Huping Hu in New York, following Hu's (lay
person) positive endorsement of Santilli's paper GALILEAN
ELECTRODYNAMICS 43 Nine Theorems of Inconsistency in GRT with
resolutions via Isogravitation.
A generally positive assessment from IBR will place the rigorous
Illert-Santilli sea shell discoveries into an area of current
Science-Art research conducted by the University of Florence.
The morphogenic papers published by Italy's journal Il Nuovo Cimento,
written by the Science-Art Centre's mathematician Chris Illert during
the 1980s, were associated with the Centre's published predictions of
the Illert-Santilli successes.
During 2006 the Centre won an award from the United Nations University
Millennium Project Australian Node for its successful correction to
Leonardo da Vinci's Theory of Knowledge.
This work had been hailed as being of global importance to science and
society by the Italian National Chair of Chemistry at the University of
Florence.
With a brief IBR comment upon Huping Hu's work as attached, the
Science-Art Centre can easily propose reasons why Santilli's work is of
urgent global social importance.
The University of Florence has become involved in Science and
Creativity, expressing views considered to be virtually identical to
our own Creative Physics.
( Their title, SCIENCE AND CREATIVITY Cultural and scientific change
and innovation in educational and social science) The University of
Florence research associated Vision-consciousness physics principles
associated with quantum entanglement concepts mentioned in the abstract
of Huping Hu attached paper.
This paper contains text reference to our own fractal worldview model.
(See attachment, Science-Art worldview mentioned page 209 "Of course,
other authors probably have already expressed similar views from
different angles or perspectives (See, e.g., Pope &
Robinson,2007)".)
In lieu of Professor Santilli's reply due to his intense rigorous
workload, some brief positive comment from IBR or an affiliated
association would suffice to assist planning to implement my A Policy
Model of the Self-Funding of Ethical Science through the Arts,
published in 1993 by the International Journal for the Arts, Sciences
and Technology (LEONARDO).
Relevant to that model, a carefully orchestrated contact with the
University of Florence is proposed, in which a letter to myself,
written by a former Italian National Chair of Chemistry at that
university, Professor Barry Ninham, provides an excellent overview of
our work.
Professor Ninham wrote about my correction to Leonardo da Vinci's
Theory of Knowledge, published in 1988, which included a paragraph to
the effect that it encompassed a revolution of thought as important to
science and society as the Copernican and Newtonian revolutions.
On the 5th, September 2006, The American Council for the United Nations
University Millennium Project - Australasian Node, awarded me a Decree
of Recognition for my lifetime of contributions toward the betterment
of the human condition, given credence by the discovery of a vast new
science and technology developed from the work of the 1991 Nobel
Physics Laureate, Pierre de Gennes.
Prof. Barry Ninham was the principal discoverer of the vast new science
and technology that my correction to da Vinci's work predicted.
His team was developing de Gennes' Nobel physics theory.
A colleague in the USA is now exhibiting in New York to make future
contacts on our behalf. Given appropriate recognition from Florence,
the research funding available for future Science-Art Research could
become virtually unlimited, as foreseen within my LEONARDO feature
published in 1993.
Our correction to Leonardo da Vinci's work, acclaimed from the
University of Florence, can be considered to lead to the generation of
considerable research monies within the international Arts
establishment.
A brief History of Science-Art Creative Physics pioneered in Australia
under the auspices of the Science-Art Research Centre follows;-
1978 Australian Government Foreign Affairs Department arranges visit of
Princeton University's black hole physicist Remo Ruffini to visit me at
the University of Sydney, resulting in UNESCO appointment as Special
Science-Art delegate to the 2nd Marcell Crossmann Meeting in Trieste in
1979.
1979 Australian National Television includes a documentary of my work
into their series The Scientists-Profiles of Discovery.
This contained a BBC interview with Professor John Taylor, black hole
physicist and Head of Mathematics at King's College, London University.
At the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, China's most
highly awarded scientists, Kun Huang, agreed that Einstein's worldview
does not relate to the entire workings of the universe.
He suggested that in order to identify the nature of new physics laws
governing healthy biological growth and development through space-time
we might do this by comparing patterning changes to the Golden Mean
logic (precursor to fractal logic) over evolutionary time scales found
within the world's sea shell fossil record.
I returned to Australia to found the Science-Art Centre, working with
Dr George Cockburn, Royal Fellow of Medicine (London) and the
mathematician Chris Illert.
Both Cockburn and myself had publications predicting the
Illert-Santilli discoveries.
Illerts publications in Italy's Il Nuovo Cimento were published under
the auspices of our Science-Art Centre.
I have just discovered a letter to the British Journal of Aesthetics
written by Dr Cockburn in 1982 which clearly anticipated the same
science being developed at the University of Florence in 2007.
Further works of Cockburn have been discovered to be compatible to the
rediscovery of Bolzano's Theory of Science, by Hamburg University
scholars.
Bolzano's work, as a correction to Kant's Aesthetics becomes Dr
Cockburn's Aesthetic Bio-physics, which can now be proven to be based
upon correct assumptions.
Bolzano's work has been reviewed the German scholars as far surpassing
anything written in the world literature concerning a systematic sketch
of logic.
That logic was extrapolated into modern fractal logic.
Professor Santilli appears to be concerned about theological persuasion
within particle physics.
Kun Huang shared the very same concern.
Newton's unpublished physics is today referred to as heresy, however
Newton's published work produced the physics principles upholding the
structure of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Instead of attacking the existence of theological persuasion in
particle physics we argued that in order to honour the design of the
concept of democracy it was necessary to upgrade the physics and
geometrical principles upon which it was founded.
Our book to this effect was launched in Los Angeles in 1989 by the
Hollywood Thalian Mental Health Organization and myself and my
co-author colleague received awards within the Hollywood Thalian Walk
of Fame.
The point to be made is that by carefully supporting relevant concepts
within the Arts, new paradigms of science can be introduced into
society.
The above example suggests that great mileage can be obtained by
suggesting that Illert-Santilli tourque forces evolving sea shell
growth and development might also apply to the evolution of the
sphenoid bone, which is in direct contact with sea shell design within
the human ear.
The sphenoid bone movement (Kun Huang's sought for Golden Mean link to
healthy human evolutionary growth and development) is now being
officially observed in medical science to be undergoing an evolutionary
act of torque force movement, which we successfully linked to the New
Paradigms of Science being developed at the University of Florence.
Huping Hu has already supported Professor Santilli's new paper.
My request to have Professor Santilli (or IBR) make a brief comment or
assessment on Hu's work (see above attachment) is so that I can
orchestrate support from the University of Florence along the lines
alluded to herein.
Scientists are recognizing that the ancestor of fractal logic was
Anaxagoras, a 5th Century BC Greek philosopher.
Dr Cockburn and myself developed our Creative Physics from the
objective of the Greek universities that fused ethics into Anaxagoras'
fractal worldview.
Because Anaxagoras used consciousness to develop his worldview then the
overwhelming physics discoveries that support it, completely challenges
the Einstein's worldview.
Aristotle's work on Ethics and Politics was specifically about
designing a science to uphold ennobling government.
Given suitable Arts Establishment recognition about these issues, then
the Self-Funding Model for developing Ethical Science becomes feasible,
hence the email to Professor Santilli.
Yours sincerely, Robert.
The Telesio - Galilei Association
Airport House, Purley Way, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 0XZ UK
Tel. +44-789-426-2399; Tel. +44(0)2087811808;
Email
info@telesio-galilei.com