I think you missed the point here. I agree completely with Jerry's assessment
on this. The main point being that there are con artists out there, who do
take advantage of people in situations such as that. Whether the technology
they claim to possess exists or not, is not as relevant as the point that
everyone should seek proof before paying money for such things, particularly in
that type of situation.
On the over-unity side, I for one am sick of wading through all the BS claims
trying to find real one's. False claims do nothing except waste people's time,
and money, and only further hurt the reputability of people making honest
claims. I have chosen not to take any claims seriously, where the inventor
claims to have built an actual working device, but have since lost it, or claim
that it was stolen, etc. This is too often the case. On many free-energy
pages, there are such claims, that are being investigated and usually come up
short. Some even have replies from the inventor claiming that the devices were
built wrong and is the reason given for why the device did not work as
claimed. But I have to ask, why haven't the inventors rebuilt the devices
themselves, as they would be the most qualified to re-build there own device,
right? This is not always the case... It is possible that the inventor has
valid reasons why they have not rebuilt it themselves, but with all the false
claims out there, it is getting hard to know which one's are worth
investigating. Unless the inventor is giving away the information for free,
and tier device can be built fairly cheaply, I would not waste my time. I
think some people have idea's that they may honestly think will work, and they
claim to have built a working device (without doing so), only to get other
people to try and prove tier theory, so that they may claim credit, just in
case it does work. There are simple devices out there that are easily built
and appear to be the real thing. But, unfortunately, even though some of these
simple devices appear to work (magnet ramp type devices for example), they
would require significant modifications, and some ingenuity to produce the
amount of energy wanted, and this leads people to spend more time working on
the more complicated devices (because someone falsely stated that they built a
working prototype), which may never work. It is bad enough that a lot of
main stream science types will never accept over-unity devices, because they
were taught that such things cannot exist, but when some of them actually do
keep an open mind, and actually do investigate these claims, the false one's
only further make up thier minds for them.