Could everyone please take a minute to post your best reason(s) as to why
NO zero-point/over-unity/free energy device has EVER made it out of the
lab, been put into production, and brought to market?
History is replete with dozens of researchers stumbling onto what seems to
be essentially the same phenomenon, from Tesla to Newman. Despite the
fact that this technique is reproducible and even allowable under quantum
mechanics, no one has seemed competent to put it to use to generate
electric power. I'd like to know your opinions as to "Why?".
While government conspiracies may well exist, the government can't deliver
mail reliably, make Amtrak run on time, keep Plutonium away from Saddam
Hussain, stop Cocaine at the borders, or do anything else well, thoroughly,
and efficiently. I find it hard to believe that it can keep free energy
suppressed for a century in the face of the economic incentive we (and
everyone else) have to develop it. Something else is in the way and I'd
like to know what the bugaboo is, for real.
My Best Guesses:
1. Is the effect not scalable to useful power levels because the local
energy density of the vacuum (aether, quantum particle flux, etc.) is much
lower than Feynmann predicted? If the free energy available per unit
volume of space is too meager, the rotating machinery approach will not
work for commercial scale systems. Its like photovoltaics; at a net
insolation power level of 250 watts/meter2, you will always need large
solar panels to do anything useful, no matter how good the cells get.
2. Can nobody find an efficient way to convert the high frequency, high
voltage Alternating Current output obtained from all of these systems to
the simple 60 Hz, 120 Vac required by all of our appliances? Newman, and
the Correas, and RQM have all faced this particular problem, and had to
stop to go invent a power converter/conditioner to make their device output
useable; yet none have gotten past it yet. If the downconversion losses
are too great, free energy systems will not be practical, even if the
effect is real.
3. Do the machines simply stop working as the permanent magnets run down
and slowly become demagnetized from the conteropposing torquing forces of
the opposite fields? Since you can magnetize a piece of iron by rotating
it past an electromagnetic coil via induction, there is no reason to think
they wouldn't become demagnetized in the same manner, when confronted with
opposite field polarity. This explains why all these devices start
working and then dry up and blow away after a short period of amazement;
perhaps magnets are just like batteries that wear down and run out.
4. Are there toxic bioenergetic effects that the developers come to
realize only after some period of extended operation, which would make any
such technology unsuitable for widespread use? Does exporsure sicken
people after a while, in some form of [EM] 'radiation poisoning'? The
abnormally high mortality rate among free energy researchers provides
impressive circumstancial statistical evidence for this.
5. Does the continuous extraction of energy from the vacuum/quantum
spacetime/aether have unforeseen environmental consequences at the
subdimensional level, for instance, allowing spiritual/psychic forces to
more easily ('too' easily) interpenetrate into physical reality from
'beyond'?
A home energy machine that brings with it its own haunting of the house
into which it is installed would find it hard to maintain widespread public
enthusiasm.
Now, I'd like to hear all of yours....
David L. Wenbert
dwenbert@spacey.net