Many of us share your concerns. Hopefully, as is happening in the
alternative medicine field, the Internet will help with spreading of some
of the ZP/OP issues. But do have a look at the following:
http://www.thegrid.net/ambatty/suppression.html
To better understand the role/relationship between business, government and
military, Gerry Vassilatos
"HAARP WITH NO STRINGS" in the 3rd Quarter 1996 Borderlands is a must read.
Chris Gupta
At 01:43 PM 7/19/98 -0400, you wrote:
>LETS FIND THE PROBLEM -- IT WILL LEAD TO THE SOLUTION.
>
>Could everyone please take a minute to post your best reason(s) as to why
>NO zero-point/over-unity/free energy device has EVER made it out of the
>lab, been put into production, and brought to market?
>
>History is replete with dozens of researchers stumbling onto what seems to
>be essentially the same phenomenon, from Tesla to Newman. Despite the
>fact that this technique is reproducible and even allowable under quantum
>mechanics, no one has seemed competent to put it to use to generate
>electric power. I'd like to know your opinions as to "Why?".
>
>While government conspiracies may well exist, the government can't deliver
>mail reliably, make Amtrak run on time, keep Plutonium away from Saddam
>Hussain, stop Cocaine at the borders, or do anything else well, thoroughly,
>and efficiently. I find it hard to believe that it can keep free energy
>suppressed for a century in the face of the economic incentive we (and
>everyone else) have to develop it. Something else is in the way and I'd
>like to know what the bugaboo is, for real.
>
>My Best Guesses:
>
>1. Is the effect not scalable to useful power levels because the local
>energy density of the vacuum (aether, quantum particle flux, etc.) is much
>lower than Feynmann predicted? If the free energy available per unit
>volume of space is too meager, the rotating machinery approach will not
>work for commercial scale systems. Its like photovoltaics; at a net
>insolation power level of 250 watts/meter2, you will always need large
>solar panels to do anything useful, no matter how good the cells get.
>
>2. Can nobody find an efficient way to convert the high frequency, high
>voltage Alternating Current output obtained from all of these systems to
>the simple 60 Hz, 120 Vac required by all of our appliances? Newman, and
>the Correas, and RQM have all faced this particular problem, and had to
>stop to go invent a power converter/conditioner to make their device output
>useable; yet none have gotten past it yet. If the downconversion losses
>are too great, free energy systems will not be practical, even if the
>effect is real.
>
>3. Do the machines simply stop working as the permanent magnets run down
>and slowly become demagnetized from the conteropposing torquing forces of
>the opposite fields? Since you can magnetize a piece of iron by rotating
>it past an electromagnetic coil via induction, there is no reason to think
>they wouldn't become demagnetized in the same manner, when confronted with
>opposite field polarity. This explains why all these devices start
>working and then dry up and blow away after a short period of amazement;
>perhaps magnets are just like batteries that wear down and run out.
>
>4. Are there toxic bioenergetic effects that the developers come to
>realize only after some period of extended operation, which would make any
>such technology unsuitable for widespread use? Does exporsure sicken
>people after a while, in some form of [EM] 'radiation poisoning'? The
>abnormally high mortality rate among free energy researchers provides
>impressive circumstancial statistical evidence for this.
>
>5. Does the continuous extraction of energy from the vacuum/quantum
>spacetime/aether have unforeseen environmental consequences at the
>subdimensional level, for instance, allowing spiritual/psychic forces to
>more easily ('too' easily) interpenetrate into physical reality from
>'beyond'?
>A home energy machine that brings with it its own haunting of the house
>into which it is installed would find it hard to maintain widespread public
>enthusiasm.
>
>Now, I'd like to hear all of yours....
>
>David L. Wenbert
>dwenbert@spacey.net
>