You wrote;
> ... Of course for this energy to be really tappable
> the rotor would have to have some some kind of
> weight to it "ie to be a flywheel.
That is the bottomline that I am looking for, now let that flywheel
powered by stored inertia power a generator and we're in
business....<g>...
---michael olson wrote:
>
> Hi Jerry,
> Its not that inertia is actually cancelled with the rotor, rather the
> inertia of one movement is transfered to the secondary movement of the
> machine. Both movements are locked together, so if you were to ride
> along from their perspective, things would be stable or seem to be
> static, when on the outside you could have this thing going at an
> incredible velocitiy. Basically the shape this thing makes is a hollow
> cylinder and if both speeds are in sync, the one movement against the
> other creates a 45 degree "incline". when that is done basically you
> have created a "clean" pathway. In trying best to explain it one
> movement isn't "bumping" into the other one and causing distortion.
They
> are perfectly coupled to one another, and so create a kind of shell
> "loosley speaking". When I first saw this image ( years ago)I saw that
> the ability to run this at any speed would create fields radiated
> outwards from the rotor and the number and strenghth of these would
> depend on the rotors velocity. Because the energy you are putting into
> the machine is put directly into the rotors movement, and since it can
> be run at any speed, you are storing indefinatley the energy you are
> putting into it. Of course for this energy to be really tappable the
> rotor would have to have some some kind of weight to it "ie to be a
> flywheel.
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com