Antimatter is Gravitationally Repulsive

In an article on NewScientist, there are two proposals to detect whether antimatter is gravitationally repulsive to matter, or not. Fermilab in Chicago and CERN in Switzerland are proposing experiments, which they hope will detect the gravitational relationship of matter and antimatter.

The Aether Physics Model induces that matter and antimatter must be gravitationally repulsive. This can be determined from the observation that two photons can join together to produce a positron-electron pair. Positrons and electrons are massive particles with the same mass, but opposite spins. The two photons must be the source of the angular momentum needed to produce these two particles, which means the right and left spin must already exist in the photon in quantities equal to half the mass of the electron and half the mass of the positron.

Standard Model theory denies the existence of Aether. Yet, the Aether provides the quantifiable structure needed for understanding how electron and positron angular momentum can coexist in the same photon.

The photon and Aether structures are geometrically identical. If the positron and electron angular momentum coexist in an Aether unit, and the photon has zero mass, then in order for two photons to produce a positron-electron pair the positron and electron masses must be opposite and therefore be gravitationally repulsive.

Further evidence of antimatter repulsiveness is observed in positron clouds drifting through space. The only way positron clouds could congregate in the wide spaces is if they were repelled from normal matter at great distances. Although gravity is a weak force, it works at great distances.

This is one experiment I would like Fermilab and CERN to get funding for. Not only could it provide strong evidence in favor of the Aether Physics Model, but it could also reveal a great weakness of General Relativity theory.

Gravitational Waves Detected

The magnetic scalar wave detector is a success! We have captured our first gravitational wave with its associated gamma ray burst. The raw data is available online and is accessible from the Magnetic Scalar Waves page. An Excel spreadsheet lists the exact gravitational wave times along with the GRB time.

In the future, there will likely be gravitational waves listed and no associated gamma ray burst. This is because not all GRBs can be detected due to interference from the Sun, Earth, and Moon. Also, there are occasional satellite equipment malfunctions due to changes in the space environment.

We are presently looking for a theoretical physics partner who is affiliated with a University or professional lab/observatory. If you are interested in collaborating with us, please contact David Thomson through the profile link in the right column.

Magnetic Scalar Wave Detector

For years, I have been observing solar and gamma ray burst (GRB) data. GRBs are bursts of high energy gamma photons, which mostly are produced by supernovas throughout the Universe. According to the Aether Physics Model, when the core of a star becomes too dense, it implodes briefly as a black hole implosion event. After a few minutes or hours, the implosion process is complete and no black hole remains. In fact, the surrounding Aether (space-time) rushes in to fill the void and then rebounds with a magnetic tsunami that radiates all across the Universe. At the same time, the distances between subatomic particles change such that the Casimir effect comes into play big time. As old matter is collapsing, new matter is being generated via the Casimir effect.

This new matter manifests first as photons. There are so many of them produced at once and in succession, that they possess what is called gamma ray energy levels. The magnetic tsunami and GRB race across the Universe, together. Most of the time, the gravity waves travel faster than the gamma rays. Eventually, the magnetic tsunami will arrive at the Sun and cause a peculiar pattern of solar x-ray spikes.

Modern physics prefers to explain everything in terms of mass, energy, and gravity. Thus, the magnetic tsunami is called a gravity wave by modern physics. They are both one and the same, but orthogonal views of each other as explained by the APM.

This week, I have built a magnetic scalar wave detector, which measures the time the magnetic tsunamis (gravity waves) impact the Earth. Today, May 12, we had our first magnetic tsunami pass through since I was recording data. The new magnetic scalar wave detector detected the gravity waves. Other data support this conclusion.

Further, it appears this magnetic scalar wave detector also detects lightning and possibly detects earthquake precursor signals. A brief presentation of the data and the raw data file is available at:
http://www.16pi2.com/magnetic_scalar_waves.htm

This is an important scientific discovery with many implications for science and saving lives. Let us get the message out so that the scientific community has to listen to us and take this Aether Physics Model seriously.

Aether Density Evident in Satellite Motion

Space scientists have been perplexed by slight anomalies in satellite motion beginning with the Pioneer spacecraft, and now with five other satellites, which are using the Earth to slingshot them into space.

The Aether Physics Model shows that space-time is a fabric of quantum Aether units. Near massive bodies, such as the Sun and Earth, this Aether fabric is stretched inward toward the mass. This effect is caused at the subatomic level when electrons and protons bind to produce neutrons. In neutron binding, Aether units are folded over on top of each other such that two Aether units occupy the same space as one normal Aether unit. It is like pinching a rubber sheet. The result is that the surrounding space-time fabric becomes stretched inward toward the neutron.

This means that just outside of a massive body, the Aether is stretched very thin. The further away from the massive body one travels, the less stretched space-time is since the stretching effect is spread over a greater volume.

The planet Mercury is very close to the Sun. The Sun is pulling a lot of the Aether fabric toward it. This means that the space-time in Mercury's orbit is thinner than in the space-time of Earth and other planets. Less space-time to travel through means Mercury will show an apparent precession compared to the predictions of Newton's gravitational law.

Apparently, the stretching of the Aether is not homogenous. It would seem that at the edge of the Sun's gravitational influence on the surrounding Aether fabric, space-time is denser than is expected, which is why scientists see the Pioneer anomaly. Actually, the "anomaly" is not with the Pioneer's motion, but is caused by the physics used to predict the satellite's motion.

The same situation applies to satellites buzzing the Earth. The Aether surrounding the Earth is less dense than the Aether in interplanetary space. Due to the expectations of General Relativity theory and Newton's gravitational law, satellites appear to have an anomalous acceleration as they pass by the Earth.

If modern physics would research and quantify the Aether, in which the satellites move, space physicists could eliminate these unexpected "anomalies."

LIGO Can't See Gravity Waves

In a recent article on Space Daily:

"The interferometer is constructed in such a way that it can detect a change of less than a thousandth the diameter of an atomic nucleus in the lengths of the arms relative to each other.

"On February 1, 2007, the Konus-Wind, Integral, Messenger, and Swift gamma-ray satellites measured a short but intense outburst of energetic gamma rays originating in the direction of M31, the Andromeda galaxy, located 2.5 million light-years away. ...

"During the intense blast of gamma rays, known as GRB070201, the 4-km and 2-km gravitational-wave interferometers at the Hanford facility were in science mode and collecting data. They did not, however, measure any gravitational waves in the aftermath of the burst.

"That non-detection was itself significant.

"The burst had occurred along a line of sight that was consistent with it originating from one of Andromeda's spiral arms, and a binary coalescence event--the merger of two neutron stars or black holes, for example--was considered among the most likely explanations. Such a monumental cosmic event occurring in a nearby galaxy should have generated gravitational waves that would be easily measured by the ultrasensitive LIGO detectors.

"The absence of a gravitational-wave signal meant GRB070201 could not have originated in this way in Andromeda..."

The LIGO system is designed within a four-dimensional frame of reference. Yet the Aether, which gravitational waves propagate through, is a five-dimensional structure. It is like expecting someone looking through a standard video camera to see with three dimensional vision into a room. The video camera transforms the reality of the three dimensional (volume) room into a two-dimensional (area) perspective. For example, if through the video camera we wanted to see behind an object in our view, we cannot move our head sideways to look behind the object. We are limited to the position and design of the video camera.

Similarly, the LIGO system was designed by people who deny the existence of Aether and don't understand its five-dimensional (space-resonance) structure. This prevents the apparatus
(interferometer) from being designed properly and does not give the scientist the impetus to wonder what is behind the four-dimensional (space-time) world we see. The five-dimensional reality of the Aether looks upon our four-dimensional perspective much like our four-dimensional (space-time) perspective looks at a three-dimensional (area-time) TV monitor.

Being in a higher dimensional reality, we can see the limitations of lower dimensional reality, but lower dimensional reality must use its imagination to understand higher dimensional reality.

Isn't it amazing that instead of assuming or questioning the validity of their physics, the scientists simply assume there is something wrong with the Universe? They know there should be gravitational waves, but because they cannot detect them, they assume the gravitational waves are not there. Yet, the Sun shows us signs of gravitational waves over 100 times a year. These gravitational wave signatures are always associated with gamma ray bursts.

The Aether Physics Model is a properly quantified theory of the Aether, derived entirely from empirical measurements and constants. This theory clearly shows us that the Aether is non-material, five-dimensional, and very real. We even directly observe the behavior of the Aether as magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, gravitational fields, solitons, phonons, frame dragging, and other non-material phenomena. Scientists simply turn their backs on the Aether Physics Model because they have convinced themselves there is no Aether.

How did they convince themselves the Aether does not exist? They used an interferometer to prove the Aether does not exist. They use the same concept to attempt to detect gravity waves. And despite having their satellites in space for over two years, they have not yet detected a single gravity wave, which was predicted by Einstein's General Relativity theory.

The Aether Physics Model also supports the existence of gravity waves, but not in the four-dimensional reality that the interferometer is built. The gravity waves exist in space-resonance, which has three dimensions of length and two dimensions of frequency. Space resonance is the same reality the Aether and photons exist in.

It is interesting that the same device that was used to disprove the Aether cannot detect the gravity waves that General Relativity theory predicts, and General Relativity theory was supposed to explain the Universe without Aether. Now, because the LIGO interferometer cannot detect gravity waves associated with gamma ray bursts, it is assumed that gamma ray bursts do not produce gravity waves, even though we can clearly see a gravity wave signature in the solar x-ray flux data every time a gamma ray burst is detected. Modern science is clearly leading us head on into a brick wall.

The Aether by a Different Name

Below is a recent article by the American Institute of Physics.

"The tiny region confining the electron even as it moves is in effect a quantum
dot."

This is how science talks about the observable Aether without admitting it exists. They simply change the name. Other examples of observable and manipulable Aether are "magnetic field," "electric field," "gravitational field," "spin," "phonon," and "frame dragging." There are even more examples.

How is it that science claims the Aether cannot exist, and yet they describe the properties of "tiny regions" that can remain static and also move?

Also, notice how they can create longitudinal waves with these "tiny regions." Acoustic waves are longitudinal waves. Longitudinal waves can only occur in a medium of some sort. That medium is the Aether.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: physnews@aip.org [mailto:physnews@aip.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 10:03 AM
> Subject: Physics News Update 838
>
>
> PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE
> The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News
> Number 838 September 7, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
> www.aip.org/pnu
>
> ACOUSTIC QUANTUM DOTS. A new experiment at the Cavendish Lab
> at the University of Cambridge is the first to controllably
> shuttle electrons around a chip and observe their quantum
> properties. A quantum dot restricts electrons to a region of
> space in a semiconductor so tiny as to be essentially
> zero-dimensional. This in turn enforces a quantum regime;
> the electron may only have certain discrete energies, which
> can be useful, depending on the circumstances, for producing
> laser light or for use in detectors and maybe even future computers.
> A quantum dot is usually made not by carving the
> semiconductor into a tiny grain but rather by imposing
> restrictions on the electron*s possible motions by the
> application of voltages to nearby electrodes. This would be
> a static quantum dot. It is also possible to make dynamic
> quantum dots-that is, moving dots that are created by the
> passage of surface acoustic waves (SAWs) moving through a
> narrow channel across the plane of a specially designed
> circuit chip (see figure at http://www.aip.org/png/2007/289.htm).
> The acoustic wave itself is generated by applying microwaves
> to interleaved fingered electrodes atop a piezoelectric
> material like GaAs. The applied electric fields between
> finger-electrodes induce a sound wave to propagate along the
> surface of the material.
> These acoustic waves have the ability to scoop electrons and
> chauffeur them along the surface.
> The tiny region confining the electron even as it moves is in
> effect a quantum dot. Such acoustic-based dynamic quantum
> dots have made before, but according to Cambridge researcher
> Michael Astley (mra28@cam.ac.uk), this is the first time the
> tunneling of the electrons (even single electrons) into and
> out of the quantum dots has been observed. This is an
> important part of the whole electron-shuttling process since
> one wants control over the electron motions and spins. If,
> moreover, electrons in two very close acoustic wave channels
> could be entangled, then this would present the chance to
> make a sort of flying qubit, which could be at the heart of a
> quantum computer. (Astley et al., Physical Review Letters,
> upcoming article; lab website at
> http://www.sp.phy.cam.ac.uk/SPWeb/research/SAWQC/research.html#SAWQC)
>

SSE 2007 Conference

I have been accepted to present the Electron Binding Energy equation at the Society for Scientific Exploration 2007 annual conference at the end of May. I will explain the structure of the EBE equation and show the latest success at predicting all the ground state electron binding energies. Not only does the equation predict all the ground state binding energies with reasonable accuracy, but it also appears to have uncovered a slight correction for the nitrogen ground state binding energy, in particular.

According to Gwyn Williams, a noted expert on electron binding energies, there are at least two experiments, which provide different binding energies than the presently accepted one. The present nitrogen grounds state is listed at 409.9eV, yet two other studies give 401.9eV and 403eV. According to my equation, the nitrogen ground state binding energy should be 403.9eV.

The SSE 2007 conference is open to the public for all who wish to attend.

After the SSE conference, I have been invited to another private conference to meet with top scientists developing the Electric Universe model. Whereas the Electric Universe model is the electric version of cosmology, the Aether Physics Model is the electric version of quantum physics. As many of you familiar with the APM know, General Relativity theory specifically has an electric counterpart in the Aether Physics Model.

Although my key registration and transportation expenses have already been paid by a generous supporter of Quantum AetherDynamics Institute, I still must raise funds for travel expenses for ten days. Anybody wishing to make a tax deductible donation to QADI may do so at NetworkForGood.org, or the PayPal button on the home page.

This marks another milestone in the development of the Aether Physics Model.