Quantum AetherDynamics Institute

What is the neutron?  Modern theory posits the neutron and proton are made of quarks of various flavors and colors.  But it is also well known that a neutron will decay into a proton and electron.  How is that possible if electrons are not made of flavorful or colorful quarks? 

Personally, I think the whole quark issue is misread data.  People are destroying perfectly good protons and neutrons and then identifying the pieces as though they were real building blocks.  I could just as easily smash a glass and declare glasses are made from glass shards.

Nobody has quantified a quark in terms of dimensions.  The way I see it, if a particle or quantum energy can't be quantified in dimensions, it doesn't exist as a real particle.  This is not to say quarks aren't being observed, but rather the data is not being interpreted correctly.

So how is the neutron quantified, then?

The electron is known to have a g-factor. In my theory I give the g-factor a positive sign. One possible solution to the neutron is that it is a proton that has captured an electron and the electron's g-factor causes the electron angular momentum to expand within the proton.

This equation reads, the angular momentum of the neutron is equal to the angular momentum of the proton plus the angular momentum of the electron times the electron g-factor times half spin.  The electron g-factor is multiplied by half spin because all the subatomic particle angular momentum has inherent half spin.

Is the above equation a true representation of the neutron?  I don't know.  In order for the equation to be precise, the electron angular momentum would have to be about 2/5 of its accepted value.  Let's see if there is other evidence to back up this equation.

The gyromagnetic ratio of the electron  is given by NIST as:

where µ_e is the magnetic moment of the electron, and h is Planck's constant.  In the Aether Physics Model the magnetic moment is transposed to units of distributed charge:

So the gyromagnetic ratio of the electron in the Aether Physics Model is:

egmr is the electron gyromagnetic ratio in the Aether Physics Model.  Applying quantum dimensions to egmr:

This reads as: the gyromagnetic ratio of the electron is equal to the elementary charge of the electron divided by the mass of the electron times the half spin of the electron g-factor.

So it would appear that the half spin of the electron g-factor is a real function of the electron.  And it would appear that the function of the half spin g-factor is to describe the precessing action of the electron, which would cause it to wobble within the proton.  This wobbling has the effect of stretching the angular momentum of the proton, causing the proton to take on more energy, and thus mass.

Where does this energy or mass come from?  It likely comes from the kinetic energy of the electron when it slams into the proton.  The kinetic energy is probably a threshold energy, so that an electron excited to about 1.253 x 10^-13 joules can be captured by a proton. 

The half spin g-factor of the electron enables this excess energy to remain contained in the proton until the resulting neutron is no longer attached to a proton, or until the neutron has a weak binding in the nucleus due to the half spin structure of space-time.  

To see where the weak interaction (weak nuclear force) would come into the equation, the electron gyromagnetic ratio can be also written in terms of the strong charge and weak interaction:

where 8px are the weak interactions of each of the particles.  With a little investigation it should be possible to determine which weak interaction is responsible for the neutron decay, but I would guess it is the electron weak interaction.

The gyromagnetic ratio of the proton and neutron are derived similar that of the electron, except that it is seen the gyromagnetic ratio is due to the larger particle's relationship to the electron.  In other words, the electron is the key destabilizing mechanism of the atom.