Trying to get a handle on this and its difficult to
tell if the spin of magnetic fields of the earth are
the cause,
though aether/zpe should be entrained to follow that
spin,
rather magnetism would be affected by the solar wind
which would then drag aether to spin with it...
http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/gyroag.htm
....the anti-gravity (effect) only appeared when the
gyroscope was spinning anticlockwise...
--------------------
much like springs intersecting each other,
in one direction, they are 180 degrees out of phase
and encounter resistance to each other
in the other direction, they are in phase and go with
the flow
That means the CCW spin that the Japanese found is
telling us (well, in my view it is) that it is NOT
being resisted by the apparently spiralling aether
influx because the springs are 'in phase'...
-------------------------
This CCW spin could be emulated with a rapidly
spinning plasma in a torus.
Started to say helical path which would be like a
spring but - at some point for a continuous mass it
has recover to start the spiral back over again.
This smacks of inertial drives where a sudden fast
motion is instantly stopped, which would drag the
local aether with it and where the aether would
continue to flow although the mass had stopped.
Of course, you would think the more resistance to
aether flow, the more inertia and 'gravity'.
So to reduce weight in mass you'd not only want to
come into phase with the spiral but accelerate it so
that it literally 'screwed' itself (and hopefully the
mass attached to it) up the incoming spirals.
There was one report from a 'landing' on a mountain
road near in Oklahoma reported in FATE magazine where
a traveller was 'surprised' to see this thing sitting
on the road.
He was approached by regular guys asking if they could
borrow some of the water from his radiator...he said
yes, but he wanted to see inside the ship.
They showed him a large tube that went around the
circumference of the circular craft and explained it
was filled with mercury, I believe...at one point the
tube rapidly tapered down (short distance) to a very
narrow section and then expanded back up (over a long
distance).
The pilot explained that the mercury was circulated
very rapidly and it created a 'force' where it was
pinched that provide lift and thrust.
--------------------------
I'd have to look up the article to see if it the
mercury was ionized into a plasma but I don't think it
was. The idea being to rapidly move a dense mass and
then, like the Dean drive, stop or slow it almost to a
stop very rapidly, then rapidly accelerate it again.
This ties in with Harold Aspdens' observations of;
SPIN and SPIRAL;
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/inertia1.txt
One other point, Eric Laithwaite did a demonstration
in front of Harold Aspden where he took a heavy metal
disk suspended on a bearing and attached to a
shaft.....you hold the shaft in both hands out in
front of you and somewhat close to the body...then
while the heavy disk is spinning, you try to life the
shaft upwards......it WON'T GO UP, it goes sideways
and up, no matter how much force you use....successive
still photos of this show that the arc prescribed is
32.8 degrees, (this might not be the EXACT NUMBER, but
I am quoting from memory) which is exactly the angle
found in DNA.....Aspden thinks this angle has free
energy and other applications.
RAPID NEAR STOP and RAPID START
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m299.html
Dr. Harold Aspden did an experiment which indicates
that aether actually couples to mass, like velcro
hooks that seep into and hold static masses...(my
interpretation)....when the mass spins, these velcro
hooks are partially broken to allow the mass to
accelerate to speed....that is the resistance/inertia
that must be overcome to get the mass spun up TO that
speed.
Essentially, he measured how much energy it took to
get a mass rotating to a certain speed....then he
would bring this to a stop....he did this over and
over, to make sure the electrical energy requirement
was very nearly the same in each test.
Then he brought the heavy rotating mass to a 'near
stop', then accelerated it again...when accelerated in
this fashion, it only took about 30% of the energy
necessary to go from a FULL STOP to full velocity,
than it had before....he repeated this several times
and it always came out the same....it ties in very
well with Puthoffs paper on 'ZPE as the Cause of
Inertia'.
=====
=================================
Please respond to jdecker@keelynet.com
as I am writing from my work email of
jwdatwork@yahoo.com.........thanks!
=================================
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------