I'd like to ask a question about time and see if anyone has
any thoughts, insights or links to information that might
relate, either refuting or supporting these UNPROVEN
contentions.
Keely wrote that 'time is gravity' indicating that the
greater the gravity, the faster the flow of time, where time
could be detected by the clocking of matter, from birth to
maturation to death.
ASSUMING this is true...
We are told that the moon is 1/6 of earth gravity, so if you
weigh 180 pounds on earth, on the moon you would only weigh
30 pounds.
(6 X 30 moon gravity = 180 earth gravity)
You are thus lighter on the moon.
IF gravity is flowing SLOWER on the moon then so is time.
That means an hour on earth would equal 10 minutes on the
moon.
(10 minutes moon time X 6 = 1 hour earth time)
Is this correct?
That means each planet would have different gravities and
different time scales relative to each other, possibly using
the local sun as a master reference for a given solar
system.
In open space, though they claim you are 'technically in
free fall'....
The truth of the matter would be that there is no gravity,
thus no time. Well, ok, very slight gravity, so very slow
time.
That's why the theory says if you travel in space for a few
months, when you come back to earth 100 years have passed.
You have only aged for the few months you were gone, while
everyone you knew is either very old or very dead.
Is this correct?
That means If you could slow time down in a given area, you
would create the equivalent of a variable 'stasis field' to
observers from outside this area, possibly even disappearing
from their perception because light and energy entering this
zone would also be affected.
Where, depending on the density of this local time field,
you could create a lagging time zone where you could spend 1
hour, age 1 hour, perceive just 1 hour,
yet, when you reduce and shutdown the field (notice, not
instantly shut it off),
you would resume the time stream and speed of the earth
which would have passed a year or even a hundred years,
depending on the density of your lagging field and how long
you stayed in there.
Is this correct?
That means by DECREASE gravity and thus SLOW time, you
create a stasis field or outright disappearance to outside
observers.
The opposite of that would be if you INCREASE gravity and
thus SPEED up time, where you would again disappear to
outside observers as you are moving too fast for their
perceptions. YOU THUS AGE FASTER, are subect to MORE WEIGHT
and EXPERIENCE MORE PERCEPTIONS during that time so that
when you exit this speeded up zone, you have aged while
others have simply clocked along at the normal earth rate.
Much like the Dorian Gray effect. So you would die a little
faster with respect to everyone else everytime you used
this.
Would that also follow??
I can't find any flaw in this and part of it is posted at;
http://www.keelynet.com/time/tdilation.htm
Thinking about coupling of resonant bodies, with the
mysterious conduit or channel that springs up between them,
AND, thinking of it taking 20 minutes to send a signal to
Mars (with Mars being much larger than earth, therefore with
higher gravity and FASTER time), then 20 minutes to get a
signal back,
WHAT IF, you could adjust the local gravity of the radio or
video transceivers on each planet so that they MATCHED,
one on Mars, the other on earth and resonantly coupled by
virtue of an identical gravity synchrony? It could be a
faster than light communication system.
-- KeelyNet - From an Art to a Science Jerry W. Decker - http://www.keelynet.com/discussion archives http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite, TX 75187 - 214.324.8741------------------------------------------------------------- To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com> with the body text: leave Interact list archives and on line subscription forms are at http://keelynet.com/interact/ -------------------------------------------------------------