Keely who built some pretty amazing devices that operate on principles
perhaps to advanced for even today's physics, or......
A bunch of astronomers/astrophysicists who impress their own beliefs
upon observations made many light-years away from the surface of this
little old planet.
I guess one way to find if time is slower on the Moon than on Earth is
to ask a radio ham if he has had any unusual results from moon bounce
radio transmissions. Perhaps measure phase differences and compare them
with "established theory."
Gavin
Jerry W. Decker wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> I'd like to ask a question about time and see if anyone has
> any thoughts, insights or links to information that might
> relate, either refuting or supporting these UNPROVEN
> contentions.
>
> Keely wrote that 'time is gravity' indicating that the
> greater the gravity, the faster the flow of time, where time
> could be detected by the clocking of matter, from birth to
> maturation to death.
>
> ASSUMING this is true...
>
> We are told that the moon is 1/6 of earth gravity, so if you
> weigh 180 pounds on earth, on the moon you would only weigh
> 30 pounds.
>
> (6 X 30 moon gravity = 180 earth gravity)
>
> You are thus lighter on the moon.
>
> IF gravity is flowing SLOWER on the moon then so is time.
>
> That means an hour on earth would equal 10 minutes on the
> moon.
>
> (10 minutes moon time X 6 = 1 hour earth time)
>
> Is this correct?
>
> That means each planet would have different gravities and
> different time scales relative to each other, possibly using
> the local sun as a master reference for a given solar
> system.
>
> In open space, though they claim you are 'technically in
> free fall'....
>
> The truth of the matter would be that there is no gravity,
> thus no time. Well, ok, very slight gravity, so very slow
> time.
>
> That's why the theory says if you travel in space for a few
> months, when you come back to earth 100 years have passed.
>
> You have only aged for the few months you were gone, while
> everyone you knew is either very old or very dead.
>
> Is this correct?
>
> That means If you could slow time down in a given area, you
> would create the equivalent of a variable 'stasis field' to
> observers from outside this area, possibly even disappearing
> from their perception because light and energy entering this
> zone would also be affected.
>
> Where, depending on the density of this local time field,
> you could create a lagging time zone where you could spend 1
> hour, age 1 hour, perceive just 1 hour,
>
> yet, when you reduce and shutdown the field (notice, not
> instantly shut it off),
>
> you would resume the time stream and speed of the earth
> which would have passed a year or even a hundred years,
> depending on the density of your lagging field and how long
> you stayed in there.
>
> Is this correct?
>
> That means by DECREASE gravity and thus SLOW time, you
> create a stasis field or outright disappearance to outside
> observers.
>
> The opposite of that would be if you INCREASE gravity and
> thus SPEED up time, where you would again disappear to
> outside observers as you are moving too fast for their
> perceptions. YOU THUS AGE FASTER, are subect to MORE WEIGHT
> and EXPERIENCE MORE PERCEPTIONS during that time so that
> when you exit this speeded up zone, you have aged while
> others have simply clocked along at the normal earth rate.
> Much like the Dorian Gray effect. So you would die a little
> faster with respect to everyone else everytime you used
> this.
>
> Would that also follow??
>
> I can't find any flaw in this and part of it is posted at;
>
> http://www.keelynet.com/time/tdilation.htm
>
> Thinking about coupling of resonant bodies, with the
> mysterious conduit or channel that springs up between them,
>
> AND, thinking of it taking 20 minutes to send a signal to
> Mars (with Mars being much larger than earth, therefore with
> higher gravity and FASTER time), then 20 minutes to get a
> signal back,
>
> WHAT IF, you could adjust the local gravity of the radio or
> video transceivers on each planet so that they MATCHED,
>
> one on Mars, the other on earth and resonantly coupled by
> virtue of an identical gravity synchrony? It could be a
> faster than light communication system.
>
> --
> KeelyNet - From an Art to a Science
> Jerry W. Decker - http://www.keelynet.com/
> discussion archives http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite, TX 75187 - 214.324.8741
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------