- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Though my current college education interest is in the life sciences area of
microgravity, recently I've been exposed to the biophysics and radiation biology within
the same area...so should I speak up on stellar physics, or that of time and graivty.
>Keely wrote that 'time is gravity' indicating that the
>greater the gravity, the faster the flow of time, where time
>could be detected by the clocking of matter, from birth to
>maturation to death.
>
>ASSUMING this is true...
>
>We are told that the moon is 1/6 of earth gravity, so if you
>weigh 180 pounds on earth, on the moon you would only weigh
>30 pounds.
>
>(6 X 30 moon gravity = 180 earth gravity)
>
>You are thus lighter on the moon.
>
>IF gravity is flowing SLOWER on the moon then so is time.
>
>That means an hour on earth would equal 10 minutes on the
>moon.
>
>(10 minutes moon time X 6 = 1 hour earth time)
>
>Is this correct?
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My thought on this: would time really be affected on the moon. The planets are under
the gravititational influence of the sun, to say...I'm looking at this were as the sun
is the nucleus of an atom and the planets are electrons circling. On the other hand,
when Apollo 11 went to the moon. The astronauts might have been on the surface for a
short time, but I'm sure for those at Nasa, it felt like an eternity.
>That means each planet would have different gravities and
>different time scales relative to each other, possibly using
>the local sun as a master reference for a given solar
>system.
>
>In open space, though they claim you are 'technically in
>free fall'....
>
>The truth of the matter would be that there is no gravity,
>thus no time. Well, ok, very slight gravity, so very slow
>time.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My thoughts: Dr. Eugene O'Neill theorized about L points were a permanent station could
be held in orbit...these L points I'm assuming are areas between the gravitational pull
of the earth and the moon were it is at it's least resistance. How would time be
effected here? Would all we know about microgravitational affects of the body
matter?..if we are in a period of no time and gravity?
>That's why the theory says if you travel in space for a few
>months, when you come back to earth 100 years have passed.
>
>You have only aged for the few months you were gone, while
>everyone you knew is either very old or very dead.
>
>Is this correct?
>
>That means If you could slow time down in a given area, you
>would create the equivalent of a variable 'stasis field' to
>observers from outside this area, possibly even disappearing
>from their perception because light and energy entering this
>zone would also be affected.
>
>Where, depending on the density of this local time field,
>you could create a lagging time zone where you could spend 1
>hour, age 1 hour, perceive just 1 hour,
>
>yet, when you reduce and shutdown the field (notice, not
>instantly shut it off),
>
>you would resume the time stream and speed of the earth
>which would have passed a year or even a hundred years,
>depending on the density of your lagging field and how long
>you stayed in there.
>
>Is this correct?
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My thoughts: I understand that light bends as it travels through space. Would this
agree with these density fields? of perception; light is how we percieve things
visually, so I can see that any change in gravity could affect the light in a way to
percieve things differently.
>That means by DECREASE gravity and thus SLOW time, you
>create a stasis field or outright disappearance to outside
>observers.
>
>The opposite of that would be if you INCREASE gravity and
>thus SPEED up time, where you would again disappear to
>outside observers as you are moving too fast for their
>perceptions. YOU THUS AGE FASTER, are subect to MORE WEIGHT
>and EXPERIENCE MORE PERCEPTIONS during that time so that
>when you exit this speeded up zone, you have aged while
>others have simply clocked along at the normal earth rate.
>Much like the Dorian Gray effect. So you would die a little
>faster with respect to everyone else everytime you used
>this.
>
>Would that also follow??
>
>I can't find any flaw in this and part of it is posted at;
>
>http://www.keelynet.com/time/tdilation.htm
>
>Thinking about coupling of resonant bodies, with the
>mysterious conduit or channel that springs up between them,
>
>AND, thinking of it taking 20 minutes to send a signal to
>Mars (with Mars being much larger than earth, therefore with
>higher gravity and FASTER time), then 20 minutes to get a
>signal back,
>
>WHAT IF, you could adjust the local gravity of the radio or
>video transceivers on each planet so that they MATCHED,
>
>one on Mars, the other on earth and resonantly coupled by
>virtue of an identical gravity synchrony? It could be a
>faster than light communication system.
>
>--
> KeelyNet - From an Art to a Science
> Jerry W. Decker - http://www.keelynet.com/
>discussion archives http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/
>KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite, TX 75187 - 214.324.8741
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------