Re: Is elemental resonance worldwide in phase?

John Berry ( antigrav@ihug.co.nz )
Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:16:33 +1200

I guess replying to your own question is a bit stupid, well I will anyway, I'm
pretty sure that they would all start to vibrate in the same phase after time
(we'll ignore loss of energy), The question now is what energy is released from
a vibrating atom that would effect the vibration of other atoms, if there is
such a force then one would expect that all atoms of that frequency would come
into the same phase as soon as there was any asymmetry in their phase.

Then again transformers induce 180 deg phase so maybe any mechanism to carry
vibrational energy of atoms would induce opposite phase, Guess the mechanisms
to induce vibration (phase) needs to be defined to work this out, it looks as
it could go either way...

Guess I'm just babbling...

John Berry

John Berry wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Your following message has been delivered to the 351 members of
> the list interact@Keelynet.com at 06:55:56 on 1 Aug 1999.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> If you had a large room full number of tuning forks all at different phases
> (but same freq.) and then brought a number of those (say 5 out of 50) into
> phase the same phase, would all the tuning folks come into phase in time?
> would the 5 influence the other 45 to one single phase? will the dominant
> phase become attractive, will others change to it?
>
> "Jerry W. Decker" wrote:
>
> > Hi Ren et al!
> >
> > I am very confused by your last post about time travel and Bruce Cathie
> > as it doesn't correlate with the original thread which was regarding
> > elemental resonance being in phase across the world.
> >
> > I also didn't understand how billionaires, financing and such came into
> > it, that is fantasy even in my world and every meeting I've ever had has
> > revolved around pumping information from me for a lunch or dinner
> > <g>...or an offer of full business with sales with them getting 90%.
> >
> > I have also experienced the failure and non-interest in several attempts
> > at organizing any group that does anything worthwhile on a shoestring.
> >
> > There are wheels within wheels for me that are best left unsaid at this
> > time, so I am in a position Keely refers to as 'deadwork'.
> >
> > Now, back to the thread, this URL indicates there are perturbations from
> > the environment;
> >
> > http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/cesium.html
> >
> > "The U.S. Naval Observatory operates about 70 such cesium clocks, as
> > well as other precision clocks like hydrogen masers, in 18 vaults whose
> > temperature and, usually, humidity are closely controlled in order to
> > minimize perturbations by their environment. The time measurements are
> > made by devices called time-interval counters that compare each clock's
> > time against that of one "Master Clock," whose frequency is steered
> > to match its time to the average of the other clocks. This time is the
> > Observatory's measure of the atomic time called Coordinated Universal
> > Time (UTC). Some cesium clocks are transported to remote locations in
> > order to synchronize other clocks."
> >
> > "In a cesium clock like these, liquid cesium is heated to a gaseous
> > state in an oven. A hole in the oven allows the atoms to escape at high
> > speed. These particles pass between two electromagnets whose field
> > causes the atoms to separate into two beams, depending on which spin
> > energy state they are in. Those in the lower energy state pass through
> > the ends of a U-shaped cavity in which they are irradiated by microwaves
> > of 3.26-cm wavelength."
> > --------------
> > This excitation with microwaves and heating to a gas I think skews the
> > natural resonance so it still doesn't definitively answer the question
> > to my satisfaction.
> >
> > It is much like the methods used in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
> > which uses a 10kilogauss fluctuating magnetic field to cause a specific
> > atom to ping when the frequency matches the resonance of the atom being
> > tested.
> >
> > I never trusted that either because of the skewing or compression of the
> > atom under the influence of the high density magnetic field. The
> > resultant frequency would be more of a mode or a harmonic, than the true
> > frequency at which the atom would vibrate just sitting on a table with
> > no unnatural outside influences.
> >
> > With regard to the molecular frequency discriminator (MFD), it appears
> > to entrain atoms swept by its signal so that a bizarre energy connection
> > is made from the transmitter to the target(s). The MFD is basically a
> > tunable oscillator attached to a coil attached to a metal stake that is
> > inserted into the ground. There is a secondary coil, electrified with a
> > 9VDC battery and connected to its own metal stake which is inserted in
> > the ground some distance from the transmitter. The purpose of the
> > secondary coil is to allow triangulation on the mass you are seeking.
> > The detector is a coil powered by a 9vdc battery and connected to two
> > dowsing rods. When it works, the rods pivot and point to these energy
> > lines allowing you to locate the mass you are seeking.
> >
> > Now all things vibrate at all frequencies, but have the highest energy
> > coupling at the fundamental resonant frequency.
> >
> > So, say you setup the transmitter and the secondary, tune the machine to
> > the resonant frequency for gold and turn it on. There will be lines
> > instantly emitted that will allow you to triangulate onto any gold in
> > the area...well, that's the theory.
> >
> > The resonant frequency for gold on this devices is 50khz with a variable
> > of 5khz which as I understand was for isotope variations. But it seems
> > to work (when it works) anywhere within that 45-55khz range.
> >
> > So that raises another question which is; When the transmitter sends out
> > the resonant frequency of 50khz, does it cause all the gold in that area
> > to synchronize to the one master frequency?
> >
> > Yet another influence would be the influx of gravity which varies over
> > the earths surface over time.
> >
> > I'll keep looking to see if the experiment has ever been done, at this
> > time, I don't think there is sufficient proof either way, but from the
> > little information I've found, it seems to be that atoms are NOT
> > synchronized but that they might be very easily. Perhaps in a time when
> > we didn't have all these EM fields creating skewing effects, the
> > elements were more tightly in tune with each other and that gets into
> > even more weirdness..so I'll stop now...<g>....
> > --
> > Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> > http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> > Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> > KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> > with the body text: leave Interact
> > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > http://keelynet.com/interact/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------