> from: http://www.keelynet.com/energy/dimshift.htm
>
> It is also worthy of note that many of the reports of free energy
> devices, when in operation and drawing 'negative energy' also
> produce phenomena relating to weight loss and temporal alterations.
>
> Years ago, Tom Bearden told me of an experiment he and an unnamed
> researcher had carried out using a scalar generated from
> interferometry. Two projectors were aimed to coincide at a fixed
> point in space. When power was applied and the frequency/phase was
> adjusted, there was no apparent change in the target area.
.. could anyone explain what exactly this means:
> "a scalar generated from interferometry." I've been studying
> caduceus coils for a couple years now, but haven't done any
> serious research on them yet. Can anyone offer any insight into
> cad coils vs. an interferometer for creating "scalars"?
>
> thanks!
> -Steve
I would suspect a scalar interferometry refers to establishing
two scalar stations or emanators. I did experiments with
these on a primitive stage. Nothing seems to be clear in
Beardons work but at that time I assumed that scalar waves
could be established by simply taking two coils and oscillating
them with ac so that the magnetic fields from both would be
acting in mutual opposition from the placement of the coils
face to face at their poles. In that kind of interaction the plane
that exists in the creation of vector magnetic cancellation
should logically contain this locked up energy. In my
interpretation we should have gone from emitting an EM
wave radially outwards in 3 dimensions to enclosing itself
to a 2 dimensional scalar planar propagation. In this kind
of model only a small portion of scalar conversion would
take place, because what is found is that the flux density
of the magnetic fields on the end poles increases concurrent to
this magnetic compression of the interior poles taking place.
Now when one station is creating a N pole compression,
at the same time another station could be making a S
pole compression. Those two stations themselves in turn
could have the planes of magnetic cancellation themselves
intersect at right angles. At this intersection point a line
exists and that point on the line closest to both stations
could represent an area where the phase locked scalar
em unlocks and will emit an induction signal on a coil in
this test area. In order for this experiment to be realistic
the test coil must be well outside the magnetic fields from
the stations. In my experiments I inconclusively noted a
weak effect. Most remarkble however was that the
oscilloscope could show a standing wave induced
signal, or two waves 180 out of phase from this target
area. This only occured on some of the sweep
settings.
I think that J Naudin has some info on cad
coil scalar effects in which this propagates as a
beam,and he warns to take caution. Some of the
more recent commentaries on Rick Andersons
excellent scalar EM site indicates that you dont
necessarily have to have magnetic cancellation
to produce a scalar effect and in actuality the
cancellation may be superfluous. I think perhaps
the hint is made that the cancellation can be
internally generated. I might be able to throw
some light on this horribly obscurred subject.
When a N magnetic pole is made on an
air core coil it can be made TWO different ways.
It can be made with a clockwise wound coil or
a counterclockwise. In each case the current
goes in opposite directions to achieve the same
effect, or so we suppose. It would seem this
distinction might be overlooked when putting
two coils together in magnetic compression
because it is assumed it makes no difference.
I can show that there is a difference. But in order
to explain this difference I might have to use the
reference point of unobvious potential.
First take the case of two identically wound
coils. ( I am referring to air core coils of thousands
of winds) Assuming these coils are safe to input
the 120 v 60 hz wall current it is found that to
secure the maximum magnetic field from the coils
they must be put in series resonance. This simply
involves putting an identical capacitive reactance
in series with this inductive reactance. When this is
done an unobvious potential expressed as a voltage
rise occurs across each of these elements, in opposite
directions similar to two forces against each other.
Now if two coils can be resonated like this and placed
with the poles in opposition it will appear as a clockwise
next to a counterclockwise in space. This occurs on
these identically wound coils because one of the
coils had to be turned around 180 in space to secure
the condition of being in magnetic opposition with the
other coil.
Now it is of course also evident that instead of
turning the coil 180 in space the input electrical
connections to one of the resonating coils could
be reversed to give the same effect, or so we presume...
In this 2nd condition the two coils would have
the same windings when viewed lengthwise even
though repulsive fields were being produced in between.
It is worth noting that magnetic fields from
air coils might have an inbedded or intrinsic spin
that is not contained in the conventional ferromagnetic.
The reaction of this spin factor to create
magnetically cancelled vectors could have everything
to do with whether a scalar wave is created. This may
not have been noted in the past.
So we have two possibilties; creating a 180 condition
by moving a coil in space, or creating the condition by
creating a 180 phasing in input. To show that these
two conditions are indeed different all that is needed
is a volt meter. The resonant rise of voltage is shown
by connecting the voltmeter across each element.
In the first case both readings on both sides will
be identical, but in the second case the identical
voltage readings will be opposite polarity.
What does this mean? It means that in the first
case identical unobvious voltages are created at
the midpoints, but in the second case they are
opposite. When a voltage measurement is taken
BETWEEN the midpoints on both cases the first
shows zero but the second shows a voltage
between them twice that due to its own rise on
each side. This shows that even though the
magnetic field action from these factors was
thought to be identical, the causitive factors
contain important differences. In the second case
while one unobvious potential grows negative, its
counterpart grows positive.
Thus the coils could also be put in magnetic
unison with no magnetic cancellation and still
produce a scalar effect by virtue of its 180
phasing input function. This is noted by allowing
the circuit to become a high frequency oscillation
by introducing a break in the series circuit so that
an arc gap forms. In the first case a massive EM
signature is seen, in the second modification I
have named as a binary resonant arc gap (BRAG)
the process produces virtually no EM.
If this represents a phased locked EM method
that is wonderful. But the problem then becomes
how to unlock it? It may be better to use cancelled
magnetic fields since a concievable method of
unlocking it has been concieved already.
I would conjecture that both conditions
may be necessary to produce the illusive critter
known as a scalar wave. HDN
_______________________________________________________
Get your free, private email at http://mail.excite.com/