The following was pulled off
the Joe Newman email list. It's from an
anonymous person who probably
got dropped off the list by Evan Soule
(who defends Newman no matter
what he says). It's interesting to me
that the poster believes there
is a conspiracy to cover up free energy but
doesn't buy Newman's solution.
Also check out The Norm
Biss Story about trying to help Newman.
Check out the latest
review of Joe's Claims
Regarding:
>Press Release from Joseph Newman for 1/1/1999
> The Joseph Newman Energy Technology is coming forward
rapidly. To all
the good and honest people I write to you:
*******
"Because honest people are TRUSTING and easy to convince,"
> There are those who - through either ignorance or deliberate lying
- tell
you the following incorrect information -
> 1. "That current flows from the Positive to the Negative side of the
battery, and so the Newman Energy Technology does not work as Joseph
Newman
states." and,
> 2. "That Newman Energy Technology does not produce a true Back Spike
of
Current."
> Both of the above statements are blatantly false! Such statements
are
made by individuals wishing to confuse and confound your understanding
of
my life's work for you and humanity.
**********
OR, they are just mistaken,
and Joe's turned it all into another conspiracy angle. Hell, even Ben Franklin
was wrong. see below...
>With respect to statement #1 above:
> To better understand this, return to a basic electrochemistry
text
concerning batteries, or simply turn to page 538 of my book (The Energy
Machine of Joseph Newman) where I quote from Mr. Pat Spellman, Chief
Chemist of Ray-O-Vac Corporation, who specifically states, "This battery
system [used in conjunction with the Newman Motor/Generator] produces
direct current which flows from the NEGATIVE of the battery to the
positive."
> Basic electrochemistry textbooks have long taught this
fact. Ben
Franklin guessed incorrectly when he stated that "current flowed from
the
positive to the negative side of the battery." Accordingly, all
basic
electric current meters were incorrectly designed and are, to this
day,
showing current flowing from the Positive to Negative side of the battery.
In reality, THE FACTS PROVE that electric current flows from the NEGATIVE
to POSITIVE side of the battery! Don't let anyone lie to you
and tell you
otherwise.
*****
If someone does say it,
immediately call them a liar. Don't give them the benefit of the doubt.
And send Joe a check.
Joe is correct about Neg/Pos, but notice that he praises
conventional science when it suits him, and asks you to forget it when
it doesn't.
> Dr. Roger Hastings - from the very first time he visited
my home and lab
in the early 1980s - began telling other technically-oriented people:
"Don't tell Joseph Newman that current flows from the Positive to the
Negative side of the battery. He will have NO part in saying
something
that is scientifically incorrect and he will rigidly hold to the true
findings of scientific experimentation that current flows from the
Negative
to the Positive side of the battery."
******
Joe will have NO PART in
saying something that is scientifically incorrect???????? LOL!! See "heat
loss", below!
> With respect to statement #2 above:
> This is a deliberate LIE! It has been taught in basic electromagnetic
engineering textbooks for years: "Physically, this SIMPLY MEANS
that the
energy contained in the magnetic field, when it is built up by current
flow
in one direction, IS RETURNED by the COLLAPSING magnetic field when
the
DIRECTION OF CURRENT FLOW reverses." and "It is evident that NO NET
OR REAL
POWER IS CONSUMED ...."
> [The above quotation is from page 136 of "Electricity Made Simple"
by Henry
Jacobowitz, Columbia University, copyrighted 1959.]
> My point is that this fact has been known in basic science
for decades.
Therefore, anyone who claims to be technically competent and tells
you that
Joseph Newman's Energy Technology does not produce a Back Spike of
Current
has deliberately LIED to you, for the purpose of confusing you.
****
Again, they are immediately
labeled liars. Lock 'em up! No parole! They're in on it too!!
> Question: Why do you think they do this? Give
it some thought and you
will realize that the Power Brokers, their "cronies" and related thieves
with their "old boy networks" do not want you the people of the world
to
know that I, Joseph W. Newman, am the Pioneer of this Revolutionary
Energy
Machine and/or that it does indeed exist as a real and viable technology.
**********
OR, they're just plain old
people like me, who saw that Joe is full of excrement, and believe he's
a fraud. Joe's only defense is to rely on the gullibility of good and TRUSTING
people, and point an accusing finger at his critics. It's his only
defense, because he can't produce a working prototype after 30ish
years.
> The very fact that they lie to you about the above-described,
KNOWN
Scientific Fact ["That when a Magnetic Field is built by current in
one
direction, the collapsing magnetic field produces current in the same
direction and amount of input current."] is significant.
********
Unless they're just mistaken.
then it's not.
> One can also know
that they lie to you about this because they tell you: the Massive
Coils
of Joseph Newman's Energy Technology produces NO back-current spikes."
Yet
you know that the basic scientific fact which I have quoted to you
is true.
Therefore, you also know that the Massive Coils of the Newman Energy
Technology has definitely produced a MASSIVE BACK-CURRENT SPIKE that
consists of REAL CURRENT!
****
Like any other inductor
on the planet.
> If they lie to you about the above, I hope you realize
that they have
also lied to you when they attempt to deny the fact of the more than
thirty
Affidavits of Operability signed by many scientists and engineers who
tested and confirmed that my prototypes demonstrate Greater External
Energy
Output Than External Energy Input.
*********
Of course, if he managed to convince them as he's
trying to convince you, then the con itself becomes the foundation of the
con. A neat trick. Then it's left to mature like a fine wine, which will
be uncorked someday and consumed. Maybe those
e of you who trust this man can sign an affidavit.
> I have been obtaining phenomenal results from the testing
and
accumulation of data on my latest production prototype and its use
in
conjunction with the 7620 Volt large Capacitor of 200 KVAR that causes
the
back spike to literally produce "thunder" [the "pow-pow-pow" sound]
in its
lightning-like back-spike. Such an effect CANNOT be produced
by only 120
volts and a mere milliamp input.
**********
Yes it can, Joe, if you use a proper inductor,
and store up a bunch of energy in your "large capacitor". Joe has discovered
the principle by which automobile ignition systems have been working for
years and years. OR, perhaps Henry Ford als
o stole his technology? He is one of the "old boys".
Let's take Bryan's idea a step further. Let's
strap a stun belt to Joe.
> If one reads a simple Simpson wire-wrapped ammeter correctly
and uses a
superb hand-held Fluke 87 Meter to read the voltage across the battery
pack
connected to my 350 lb Motor with a 140 lb Rotor, one will accurately
read
that the resonance effect of the tremendous back spike from my Motor
to the
large capacitor is ALSO imposed upon and in the battery pack itself,
as one
observes the simple Simpson Ammeter needle swaying from 400 to 1000
MA and
simultaneously observing the Fluke 87 Meter giving voltage across the
battery pack rises to the highest voltage shown at the exact same instant
of the highest current shown on the Simpson Ammeter.
> Anyone who has had experience with batteries KNOWS THAT
THE VOLTAGE
FALLS MORE AND MORE WITH HIGHER CURRENT DRAWN FROM SUCH A BATTERY.
*******
You're double talking, Joe. The battery voltage will not
drop when being charged by the back spike. And current goes up with voltage.
Ohms law. ( Or, you could always tell us that Ohm was wrong ). Of course,
what's lacking in your description
is an explanation of how these components are wired together.
It might help us to understand. Or did you just forget?
> Therefore, the honest and thinking person knows that the
current swing
from 400 to 1000 milliamps comes from my Motor/Generator and the highest
instant and coinciding VOLTAGE-RISE ON THE BATTERY PACK SO PROVES this
fact.
*****
There. Now you're getting
my point. Still doesn't prove UO.
> These observations should begin to help you understand why
****
if you're not at all technical or inquisitive....
>, in the early
1980s, Dr. Roger Hastings (after he had conducted numerous tests on
my
prototypes) said to me in frustration:
"I am going to quit using the word 'EFFICIENCY', because how can you
use
such a term when you start off with NEGATIVE Power?" I told him
to forget
about it and rather choose to fully comprehend the scientific reality
that
we are converting mass to energy (via high efficiency of apr. 99.99999)
in
accordance with Einstein's principle of E = mc2. As Dr. Hastings
began to
understand the significance of this principle as it applies to
electromagnetics, his frustration diminished and he had no difficulty
in
providing mathematical and testing analyses with respect to the technology.
> Proof: See the MinnKota Motor (representing stolen technology
from myself)
in which MinnKota Motor Corporation states in their OWN literature
that
their 3-HP Trolling Motor only draws 540 watts. Therein they
are stating
that the MinnKota Motor is more than 400% efficient.
******
How unfortunate you didn't show the MinnKota
at your first demo. You had one there, I hear. Why didn't you show 'em
some OU, rather than your non-functional motor? Those manufacturers always
bend their specs anyway. Too bad you don't have t
he talent to check it out.
> As you know, when I discovered this I publicized this
fact on the
internet and newsmedia as well as in the 8th Edition of my book
***
@80.00+ dollars
>and a VHS tape
**
@ 30.00+ dollars
> depicting the Motor's operation in which I tested the 41-lb Thrust
MinnKota Motor in comparison to a 3 HP gasoline outboard motor.
I
demonstrated that the MinnKota Motor performed with the same output
power
as the gasoline motor and it only drew 540 watts. This 540 watts
figure
was exactly as MinnKota stated in their literature.
*****
That was the one where your wife taped you doing
laps in the lake, right? Another of your highly accurate experiments?
Was the motor tuned? Did you open the throttle all the way, or cheat a
little bit?
> It is no accident that the Director of Johnson Corporation
[the parent
company of MinnKota] is also the Director of Mobil Oil Corporation.
The
Johnson Corporation purchased MinnKota Corporation at the time that
MinnKota was a small, family-owned company 60 miles south of Minneapolis,
MN where Dr. Roger Hastings was employed with the (then) Sperry (Univac)
Corporation as a Senior Physicist. It was soon after Dr. Hastings
contacted MinnKota about utilizing my life's work and he became a
consultant to MinnKota, that the Johnson Corporation purchased MinnKota.
****
So, oil companies WANT your
technology produced? Now I'm confused...
> It is no accident that as soon as I publicized the information
concerning the theft of my work by MinnKota Corporation that the company
immediately began pulling the 41-lb Thrust Motor off the market - even
though it was an very commercially successful product.
> If you can purchase a 41-Thrust Motor that has not been
tampered with,
then attach to its shaft a 5-inch diameter pulley with a rope looped
over
it and connected at both ends to a spring tension of approximately
11 lbs;
also connect it to a charged deep cycle 12-volt battery with a Simpson
50
amp meter in the circuit (as well as utilize a Grainger tachometer,
to
obtain approximately 1200 rpms. [Make certain that the rope hangs
straight
down on both sides of the pulley to the spring so that the rope does
not
"squinch up" too tightly.
****
Gosh. And if it doesn't
work, it must have been "tampered with". Now I'm getting it. And if I build
a Newman motor of my own, and it doesn't show OU, I must have done it wrong.
> The resulting efficiency equation is 2 x #(3.14) x lbs
(ft.) x rpm and
divided by 33,000 equals the horsepower. I performed this simple
scientific test and obtained 768 watts out (on the shaft of the Motor)
and
45 amps draw at 12 volts which equals only 540 watts input power, thus
providing 142% (production) efficiency. Remember, the true power
out on
the Motor is computed as the losses in the Motor plus the power out
on the
shaft.
****
I wish I could believe you.
Too bad it wasn't at one of the demo's.
> During the test conducted, the Motor drew 45 amps.
The heat loss of a
Motor is computed as the current squared times resistance. Using
a highly
accurate Ohm meter, I tested the MinnKota Motor's resistance and it
proved
to be .5 ohms of resistance. 45 amps squared equals 2025 x .5
ohms which
equals 1012 watts of heat loss in the Motor plus 768 watts out on the
shaft
equals 1,780.5 watts produced by the MinnKota Motor (which represents
technology stolen from myself) with only 540 watts input power.
As a
results, this makes the MinnKota Motor (Newman Technology) more than
300%
(production) efficient. As I have previously described in my
published
work, this occurs in accordance with E = mc^2. This was clearly
understood
by Dr. Roger Hastings during the years that he conducted extensive
testing
of numerous Newman Motor/Generators prototypes.
*************
*************
No, Joe. POWER, meaning WATTS, is input current^2
x resistance. Ohms law again. Calling it heat loss is misleading. And,
No again, Joe. The resistance of a motor is a dynamic
thing, depending on the load and other things you haven't thought of. You
have the data to figure it out, but I'll help you anyway:
12v in at 45A = effective resistance of .2666 ohms ( E/I=R
). SO, power ( I^2xR ) is 45^2 x resistance of .2666 = 539.865 WATTS. Ain't
math wonderful? You can't have it both ways, Joe. Measuring the motor at
a standstill shows how much you re
ally know about motors. AND,
NO AGAIN, JOE! You are telling us that the heat loss is
different than the input power, so you can fudge the numbers by adding
both heat loss and output power into your efficiency equation. That's garbage.
Your "heat loss" and your input power
r ARE THE SAME THING, JOE! Telling us that the heat "loss" is GENERATED
by the motor, is VERY misleading, Joe. Or to apply your system of justice,
YOU ARE LYING.
Perhaps this would be a convenient time to throw "conventional
science" out the window?
> Just as nonbelievers and liars attacked, ridiculed, and
denied the
success of Galileo's telescope, so can honest and sincere persons witness
the same treatment concerning my life's work for humanity.
*****
Read "honest and sincere" as "people who don't know
any better". AND, Joe, Galileo's telescope offered something you failed
to at two demos: PROOF!
> All the above information (as well as what follows below),
I have
written for you the honest individual. The results of my life's
work are
already being produced and used: the MinnKota Motor is proof
of this fact!
*******
Too bad it wasn't shown
AT THE DEMO, JOE.
> Dishonest and lying individuals
****
and people who can see through the con...
> can be expected to attack my life's
work. I only ask those sincere and intellectually honest individuals
to
BUILD THE TECHNOLOGY FOR YOURSELF! I sincerely invite you to
construct
your own prototypes which you are welcome to build for your own utilization
and experimentation. If properly constructed according to the
principles
as described in my fundamental book,
**
@ 80.00+ dollars
> you will discover the same anomalies
which I originally discovered years ago and which led me to the development
of the Energy Machine prototypes.
******
So if we build one, we see anomalies?. I get that from
a model airplane.
> I am certain that a 400-lb production unit is ready to
be mass-produced
to provide electrical energy for a home. Larger units will be
able to
provide energy for your farms and businesses, and ultimately deserts
can be
transformed into oases and the pollution caused by other forms of energy
production can be eliminated.
****
Too bad it WASN'T AT THE
DEMOs, JOE. Arizona is still a desert.
> The Power Brokers have intentionally kept me off the stock market
so
that you, the people, could not assist my company in raising the necessary
capital to produce my life's work. At one time I was working
closely with
a financial consultant in New York who was endeavoring to secure a
public
placement of stock for the purpose of raising capital. This individual
reported back to me in dismay, "Joe, the word has been put out on Wall
Street NOT to assist you with capitalization of your company."
In all his
years as a financial consultant, he had never seen such concerted
opposition to ANY efforts to raise capital via conventional stockmarket
methods.
> Make no mistake about my position: What those who
opposed my honest
efforts to raise capital via the market were, in effect, saying is
that: I
WILL NOT SELL OUT THE PEOPLE OF THIS NATION AND THE WORLD - NOT FOR
ANY
AMOUNT OF MONEY I HAVE BEEN OFFERED, AS WELL AS THE FACT THAT MY LIFE
HAS
BEEN THREATENED IF I DID NOT SELL YOU OUT! My book also documents
an offer
of 214 million dollars from a Canadian Corporation which I rejected
because
it would have entailed my selling out my rights to this technology.
> As anyone knows who has followed my work in the past,
I strongly believe
in a concept of God. For most of my life I was an atheist.
As a result of
circumstances described in my book, I later changed my view and came
to
believe in God. As a matter of fact, most of the major scientists
in
history believed in a concept of a Deity. Some had very strong
feelings in
this regard and so expressed themselves - such as Isaac Newton, who
even
separately published his book on Theology.
> It is my personal and sincere belief that the God in which
I have chosen
to believe has provided me with a new direction for my technology for
you
and for all of humanity. During the concluding days of my week-long
demonstration in Scottsdale, Arizona, several knowledgeable individuals
have caringly expressed to me their belief that I should establish
a
Foundation for my work.
> As a result of their suggestions and input, that is exactly
what I am
now doing. And, in accordance with my personal and strong belief
in a
Deity (for which I do not apologize), I have entitled the name of this
Foundation: "God's Free Energy - Fresh Water - and Clean Environment
Foundation." It is my intent that the production of my life's
work be
accomplished by this newly-created nonprofit entity. I invite
YOU - the
people of the world who are caring and honest people and who are truly
concerned about the future of our planet, as well as its quality of
life
for our children, our loved ones, and even the well-being of other
species
which inhabit planet earth with us - to give whatever amount you can
afford
- whatever it may be - to this worthy Foundation, for the benefit of
humanity through the production of this technology. The intent
of the
nonprofit Foundation is to also provide you with a tax-deduction for
whatever amount you can provide.
> The facts prove that I have given my life and will continue
to do so. I
invite you to join me in my FIGHT for you and all of humanity.
Together we
will succeed and I sincerely believe that God is with us!
********
I got chills. Everything's in there. Oppression.
David and Goliath. GOD. HE's even in the title. Nice touch, Joe. And now
people won't even need to see a return on their investment. It's all just
donations.
>Your contribution to the Foundation can be sent to:
God's Free Energy, Fresh Water,
and Clean Environment Foundation
at:
11259 E. Via Linda, #100/943
Scottsdale, Arizona 85259
Wishing good and sincere people a Happy New Year!
[signed]
Joseph Westley Newman
(602) 657-3722
**************************************************************************
People,
This is wrong. This guy is making statements and getting you all worked up so that you'll give him your money. Period. It's a very good, well managed and nurtured con, with the goal of taking your money.
We start with a notion of free energy, convince a few people who sign affidavits, then sit on it to allow the very length of this affair to contribute to its validity. Put on a few shows, make some sparks, call people liars, cry wolf at every turn, and make excuses as to why there is no prototype after all this goddamn time. Keep it vague. Bend the truth. Even get lucky enough to go on TV. Then as the scam matures, and facts become distorted over time, re-awaken the game and bring it home. Start selling shares. Create a foundation. Let the false history become the foundation for the next round of lies.
Joe is right in that there is a conspiracy against we the people, to keep us in oil/nuke/coal based energies. There is most certainly an "old boy" network, and we feel it every time we put gas, and not methanol, into our cars. It angers me like it angers you, and he's using that anger to get you to jump on his clean energy bandwagon. If you're creating a con, the more truth, the better.
So, now comes the damage control. Evan will start accusing, or attacking, or whatever, to make me look like the bad guy. He's good at it too. I'm sure Evan will rise to the occasion, and find some things in here to pick apart. It will come. It has to come. The whole game is under attack. Remember, he will come at me from god knows what angles. My words must be diminished.
Or here's a good one, Evan. You could try "I won't even dignify that with an answer". That puts me away without addressing my points. Glad I mentioned it.
Why do you think Evan won't stand serious criticism on the list? Because it's dangerous. Words frighten him. They frighten him because there is no concrete, measurable, demonstrateable support for the claims of Joseph Westley Newman.
Some of you will think I'm one of the bad guys, some of you will be applauding me, and some of you will not know what to think. I don't blame any of you in the least. It's your decision as to who's on the level. I wish you all luck, and I wish you all keep your hard earned money.
As for me, I'm not going to choke Joe's shaft while he goes "pop-pop-pop".
Eric,
this is wonderfull stuff your posting....ITS ALSO VERY SAD...it
would
be intresting to determine the calories NEWMANS motor is putting
out
as waste HEAT...and COMPARE that with the total amp-hours of his
batterys
if put on a RESISTIVE load....what im saying is in a defined
electric
motor such as in a RC model airplane ELECTRIC motor with NI
CADS,
the batterys REALLY heat up as they dump through the motor, BUT
all
the TOTAL heat in the system the amp hours RATING of the batterys
SHOULD
be ACCOUNTABLE in a CALIROMETER....IN other words does his MOTOR
genorate
MORE HEAT then the batterys discharge rating can ACCOUNT
FOR....If
so its a winner.....LOOK A FRIEND OF MINE WAS bitten by the
GREY
motor...YOU might want to include that in your discussion...it USED
PULSED
CAPACITORS to spin a very primitive ARMATURE...the COST of
constructng
one ....IN THE thousands of dollars...and the supplier would
furnish
them at a hefty price(very high voltage) as if you were running
your
cars engine off its IGNITION COIL....my friend had a lot of
bussiness
work to do and had no time to construct the GREY HIGH VOLTAGE
PULSED
SELF CHARGING MOTOR....I told him to FORGET about any motor that
relied
on BATTERYS....EXIDE BATTERYS have been used on JACOBS wind
chargers
for years to store excess power...BUT except on OLDER wind
genorators
that may need a battery to excite the genorators CORE...ALL
NEW
wind genorators use HIGH QUALITY PERMANENT MAGNETS...that are
rotated
by the propeller shaft..inducing A.C, in the external pick up
coils...SO
NO COMMUTATOR is required..(that was TESLAS big contribution
wasnt
it) MY POINT....todays wind genorators dont NEED BATTERYS
ANYMORE...just
an inverter and protective circuits to augment purchased
power...ANY
SYSTEM that NEEDS batterys to function is suspect...BATTERYS
are
THERMALLY and CHEMICALLY DEPENDANT on ACID CONCENTRATION , meaning
they
may APPEAR to SELF REGENERATE...they also EXPLODE if there CHARGED
in
the way these FREE ENERGY GUYS ABUSE them from hydrogen
outgassing.....SO
ive never cared for any of there devices...REMEBER
Newman
also built an OSCILLATING version...like a soliniod...theres only
one
thing YOUR people should Know...ANYTIME you ATMOSPHERICALLY COOL a
HIGHLY
magnetized AND INDUCTIVLY HEATED armature as NEWMAN DOES there is
a
potential PYROMAGNETIC energy input...I feel that is over looked by
your
skeptics often...MAGNETS are THERMALLY dependant HEAT or COOL any
magnet
and you WILL genorate seemingly UN-EXPLAINED POWER OUTPUT IN A
SURROUNDING
PICKUP COIL....SO dont be too hard on NEWMAN...he may indeed
be
genorating excess power...BUT so does a WIND GENORATOR...AND THEY NO
LONGER
REQUIRE BATTERYS TO EXCITE THERE ARMATURES....I still hope theres
something
to all of this....keep in mind on my own devices, atmospheric
CONVECTIVE
flow IS ALLWAYS REQUIRED FOR excess power output....your
REALLY
just doing with your skeptical FREE ENERGY web sight what ANY
REASONABLE
person would do...asking for at least some load ...some
defined
output...or after test, battery charge measurment....IM JUST
VERY
SORRY YOUR FREE ENERGY SKEPTICS HAVE FOUND SO LITTLE TO BE
ENCOURAGED
BY AFTER SO MANY YEARS....BY NOW THESE PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE
MORE
TO SHOW FOR IT....and i do also SPEAK of millions of dollars being
required
to capitalize ...with the singular exception my DEVICES were
appliable
to PERSONAL AERONUATIC TRANSPORTATION... a very , very
expensive
undertaking....AGAIN IM VERY SORRY these demonstrations have
been
so disappointing..THERE IS A GRAIN OF TRUTH TO ALL OF THIER
MACHINES,
excepting the diliberate frauds....and its the AIR surrounding
them...and
the NATURAL convective currents constantly heating and
cooling
thier magnets..
From: Mike Carpenter <mcarp@mindspring.com>
Mr Soule: You are indeed correct. I am among
a group of people that
probably will never call Mr Newman. One of the reasons is the
one that you
state: I do not wish to waste my time or Mr Newman's. The
other reason is
the cause of my feelings that it would be a waste of time: I
see no
evidence that any of the documents you have produced, statements by
others,
technical documents, measurements, experiments, statements of your
own
(which for the most part are filled with accusations instead of technical
information), ACTUALLY prove more power out over power in. Numbers
can be
wrong. A system that keeps running for years without further
input,
whatever the numbers, is self evident.
I repeat my bottom line which you always seem to ignore:
Are you powering a house continuously off a self sustaining Newman built
system?
Mr Newman: Except of course for your statement
that you will not leave
the country, the information that you use to reply to Mr Biss is practicly
identical to that in your book. We've heard all about the litigation.
We've heard all about the allegations. We've heard all about
the power
brokers. We've heard all about the conspiracy to keep your technology
from
the people. If they are so all powerful, how did I so easily
get your book
through mail? Couldnt the power brokers have intercepted it?
How do I know its the real book? Maybe the power brokers DID intercept
it
and made you look bad by changing a bunch of stuff in it.
No I dont buy that. You look pretty bad on your own.
Your book is 95% conspiracy and 5% theory. I paid $80 for a handful
of
pages of theory.
By the time I got your book in the mail, I had already read a large
percentage of the book's content on line. This mainly includes
the various
legal actions, affidavits, war with the patent office and a whole lot
of
other stuff that had nothing to do with technical matters. It
also
includes some various tests of Newman motors that appear in your book.
I
am somewhat dissappointed.
In addition to that I had read many pages of documents from various
individuals hoping to make your invention work, showing test results,
configuration of experiments, etc etc, resulting in now, months of
man
hours reading day and night about YOUR technology.
Not one of these machines runs a house. Not one of these machines
runs
itself!
You have not stated you are living in your house with a Newman generator
running it.
No amount of funds are going to make your machine work. If it
works sir,
tell Arizona power to take a hike, pull the plug and turn on Newman
power.
That will be your bottom line AND mine.
Give me no more numbers. No more conspiracy. The patent
which you seek is
meaningless. The war you have fought has been a waste of time.
You have
stated that over $1,000,000 has gone into the war against power brokers
and
the US government. If you had in the beginning made your invention
public
domain and just simply started building it, the money you have now
wasted
could have built many many Newman machines. If you indeed wished
to give
it to mankind, you should have given it. Your pride has become
your
downfall. In your struggle to gain recognition for Joe Newman,
you have
kept everyone including yourself from benefitting from the technology
you
claim is given to all mankind by God. In all religious works
I have read,
you represent the speaker. The speaker takes no recognition in
comparison
to God. God is the giver. Not Joe Newman.
You have succeded in aquiring and spending over $1,000,000 WITHOUT A
PATENT. Think what you could have built with this money had you
not waged
a war with the power brokers and patent office.
By my calculations you are an old man. You have very little time
left to
do what you must do. There is no more time left for law suits.
There are
still plenty of people that we the skeptics have not gotten to that
you can
rely on as investors. Build your machine sir.
Build your machine sir.
BUILD IT.
========================
The following is from Stefan Hartman
of Germany who has failed to replicate Newman's
claims after 6 years of attempts:
I agree,
as long as Newman did
just sell videotapes and books
and did demos of the technology
I guess this was a valid income
to raise money to perfect the technology.
But now as he takes huge monies in advance
(3500 US$)
and also just calculates wrong the output
power from his motor in his latest press release
by a factor of 2 by mixing up the diameter versus the radius,
this seems to me already just as much as a fraud.
His motor as demoed had an output of around 20 Watts only and
he speaks about it as the "production motor" which will power
a home with 10 KWatts.
No way !
Why, does he not just produce smaller motors
and really show the overunity output by powering a real load ?
Because, if at all, the mechanical output is NOT as high
as Newman believes.
The REAL Newman effect is in my opinion the
arc at the commutator spark gap with its negative current
component, but Newman went into the wrong direction.
The mechanical output of the motor is simular to a normal DC motor
and could not reach much more than 100 %, if at all...
Regards, Stefan Hartmann.
return to main Newman
page
go to Norm Biss story
of trying to help Newman page
Free
Energy FAQ page
free energy with
wires and magnets - is it possible
Back to both points
of view on Joe Newman's claims.
History of free energy
claims
See Archives
of the Free Energy Email list