Text: From: Leslie R. Pastor To: Sterling D. Allan Cc: Tom Bearden Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 3:02 AM Subject: Please Update with Dr. Bearden's expanded explanation. Sterling, Please incorporate Tom Bearden's explanation regarding 'EM energy from the vacuum' and the 'source charge' problem (below). Dr. Thomas E. Bearden's 'eloquent statements (below) explain the nature of the 'ZPE - Energy From The Vacuum' source of that immense power of which Nikola Tesla referred to as the very 'wheelworks of nature.' This has been confirmed by Myron Wyn Evans. Mr. Evans, has received a 'civil list' pension from Queen Elizabeth II of England. Source: http://www.aias.us/  All the Best, Leslie R. Pastor Cc: Tom Bearden ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Bearden To: 'Leslie R. Pastor' Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 11:49 PM Subject: RE: Sterling Allan's Editor made some changes Leslie, Problem is that, sooner or later, anyone who is seriously interested in EM energy from the vacuum is going to have to think about, and ponder upon, the source charge problem. Any charge just sits there and pours out real observable photons in all directions, continually. That is easily confirmed by experimental measurement. Yet no instrument known to man can detect any energy input to the charge. Again, that is easily confirmed experimentally. But those photons pouring out at light speed in all directions, establish and continually replenish the charge¹s associated EM fields and potentials ­ at light speed. Leave the charge alone, and it will pour out real EM energy freely, from now till the end of the universe. The original charges in the original matter of the universe have been pouring out ³free EM energy² this way for some 13 billion years. All observable EM energy in the universe is produced by the associated charges as freely flowing streams of real, usable EM energy. As Van Flandern points out with his frozen and unfrozen waterfall analogies, the ³static² EM field is not like a ³frozen² waterfall, but is precisely like an ³unfrozen² waterfall. It is comprised of internal parts in continuous motion, although the overall form and pattern appear ³static² and unmoving. Every observable EM field and potential ­ and every joule of observable EM energy in the universe ­ is freely produced by the associated source charge(s) in that manner. The source charge problem faces us with two possibilities: Either (1) The charge creates all that energy from nothing at all, thereby falsifying and destroying the conservation of energy law (and most of physics), or (2) The charge continually absorbs disordered virtual state energy from the subquantal oscillations of the virtual state vacuum, changing each absorption of a virtual photon into mass-energy of the mass of the charge, thereby reordering these differentials of virtual state energy (that is a negative entropy operation falsifying the present second law of thermodynamics, which already has many known and accepted violations and requires revision), coherently integrating the now-reordered differentials of mass-energy to the next quantum level of excitation. Whereupon the zitterbewegung of the vacuum ³shakes out² a real, observable photon, so that the excitation abruptly decays by emission of a real, observable photon. The process iterates, so that observable photons are continually emitted, with no observable energy input but with the required energy input in virtual state form. The latter choice is what actually happens. So every charge in the universe is already a nonequilibrium steady state (NESS) thermodynamic system, continuously consuming positive entropy of the virtual state and producing negative entropy of the observable state, as shown theoretically possible by Evans and Rondoni in 2002. Further, this also violates the Klein geometry utilized in physics since 1872, and requires change of the underlying geometry to Leyton¹s object oriented geometry, now established very clearly in robotics, etc. Klein geometry, by its group symmetry operations, dictates that breaking symmetry at one level loses the information at that level, so that the overall symmetry is reduced to that of the next lower level. That is a sort of built-in ³entropy² producing operation whenever symmetry is broken. On the other hand, Leyton¹s more advanced groups and group methods result in the information at a given level being retained when symmetry is broken at that level, and also a new symmetry formed at the next higher level. That is a sort of built-in ³negative entropy² producing operation whenever symmetry is broken. Nature is beginning to strongly show the correctness of the Leyton geometry and its superiority over the old Klein geometry. So by making the appropriate change in geometry also, finally all meshes and the long vexing source charge problem is solved. Also, we point out that circa 1902 Lorentz arbitrarily symmetrically regauged the already curtailed Maxwell-Heaviside equations, so that he just arbitrarily discarded all asymmetrical Maxwellian systems! He did it just to get simpler equations much easier to solve, thus eliminating most of the tedious numerical methods otherwise required. Lorentz symmetrical equations are much easier to solve and get algebraic solutions.; The standard CEM/EE model used in all electrical engineering still uses Lorentz symmetrically regauged equations, which means that all asymmetrical systems are still arbitrarily discarded and ignored. Nature does not eliminate those systems; the early scientists did it and scientists and engineers still propagate that huge error for some inexplicable reason. The very type of system represented by the source charge and its continuous production of negative entropy is an example of just such an asymmetrical electrical power system. It takes its input energy as disordered energy from the subquantal fluctuations of the vacuum, reorders to apply a negative entropy operation, breaking the ³symmetry² of the virtual state vacuum itself. Then in accord with Leyton geometry, this generates a new symmetry at the next higher level: the observable state level where we encounter the usable EM fields and potentials and usable EM energy of the universe. The bottom line is that all EM energy already is extracted from the vacuum, and it occurs in freely flowing streams of usable EM energy, from the source charges. We ourselves do not have to learn how to extract usable EM energy from the vacuum! All charges and dipoles in the universe already do that freely and continuously. We simply have to relearn how to build and use asymmetrical Maxwellian systems, using the free regauging energy to freely power loads, without destroying the ³external² source of potential energy flow. Best wishes, Tom

See Also:

Source: