Text: Interactions Within a Simultaneous Creation Q: How do you know... you have described this interaction as occurring, not your here in your imagination, creating this interaction, not as we say, astral projection, or whatever that is -- so how do you know what's going on on Earth? B: Again, in this way, there are many different ideas and interactions, and types of interactions that we partake of. But do not forget that astral projection, in a sense, is also within the dimension of imagination. Q: Okay. Then that raises another question that I thought of when Steve asked the question from the guy in Dallas. He said he was having an out-of-body experience. B: Yes. Q: Is there any such thing as "out-of-body travel"? Is it only imagination? B: In your terms, because you have created a type of universe that has the different levels in it, yes it is real. Q: There is such a thing as out-of-bodyŠ B: Yes. What we are saying is that the entire idea of all of the levels in the universe is within the dimension of imagination. It is a creation. Q: Can you help me, and perhaps some other people here, to get a better grasp on how it is? Because I think that when you use the word imagination, and relate it to this interaction occurring in your imagination, you use the word differently than we use it here on this planet. B: Perhaps. Q: Could you help us bridge the gap betweenŠ B: It is simply that -- as we have said -- that what occurs within our imagination is real. The idea is more akin to the idea of becoming lost in a daydream that seems to be so more real while it is going on than when your focus changes back to the reality you were experiencing, before the daydream. Only you think that you have come back to the real reality, and were only imagining. To us, the daydream is just as real. I experience our interaction together as a very intense daydream -- more perhaps what you might refer to as an hallucination, but I know it's real. Q: But it's your imagination, which you are creating. B: But it's yours too. Again, it is a co-creation. It is synchronicity. It is the interaction itself that creates you and me. Q: Let me come at this question a different way. B: Did you hear what I said, first of all? Q: Yes. B: What did I just say? Q: You said that it's the co-creationŠ B: It is the interaction itself that creates you and me. Q: Yes, I understand that. B: All right. Q: But my attention is on the fact that there is, if you will, a collective daydream going on of all the beings on Earth. B: Yes! Q: Without you and Essassani there is a collective daydream going on. B: Yes, of course. Q: Okay. How do you know the content of that collective daydream? B: We do not know all portions of it. Q: But you know some portions. For exampleŠ B: We know the portions that have to do with the synchronicity of our interaction with you. And only those portions. Q: So it's not possible for you to simply observe, or is it - without interacting with us on these Mondays, Tuesdays or Wednesdays? B: But do not forget: an observation is an interaction, and is actually interactive. Q: Okay, wellŠ B: I simply may not be talking about it; but it is still an interaction. Q: Well, how did you know about Chernobyl for example, or the Challenger disaster? B: In this way, the idea is that what you call the physical channel is a part of your daydream. And since we are connected, then anything the physical channel knows, we know. Because by synchronicity what the physical channel knows we are supposed to know, so we can use it in that way. Q: Okay. Independently of this process called channeling, do you engage in other data collecting activities relative toŠ? B: From time to time, yes. And that is one of the reasons why sometimes we can come through with information in conceptual form that the channel is not aware of, even though the terminology may not be according to what you use upon your planet. For in this way, we can have our observations about the ideas that we sense are going on in the portion of the daydream we share with you, whether the physical channel is aware of it or not. Q: Okay. Here's a corollary question: you told us that you physically appeared to the Orion entity consciousness. B: Yes! Q: In his reality which is 175,000 years agoŠ B: Yes. Q: Not a thought projection, but you physically appeared. B: Both. What you would call a physical appearance. Q: Which means that you travel - what we would say -- travel through time. B: I'm doing that now, to talk to you. Q: But it's different, because -- why have you chosen to channel rather than appearing to us physically? B: I have explained that before. Q: Well, it has to do with the idea that we would think you are a God, and we couldn't relate, butŠ B: It has more to do with the idea of our energy being so different; that it would force an acceleration of your energy, and force you to look at portions of yourself you are not ready to look at. Q: Ah, okay. All right. B: But the idea of our ability to appear to the so-called Orion, in this way, is simply because their society -- even in the state that it was in, in what you term to be negativity -- still had within their society already the recognition that they could travel from planet to planet, and interact with other races - so that was not a shock. Q: One last question: imagine being in the rafters of a building -- you know what rafters are? B: Yes. Q: And looking down in many different rooms, so you can look and see that there are lots of different rooms. B: Yes. Q: And each of the rooms is a point in which we would call time. They're all simultaneous. B: Yes! Q: And let's suppose that we're looking at the house that represents Earth. You're up in the rafters; you can see the past and the futureŠ B: Yes. Q: Š or many potential pasts and many potential futures of Earth. B: Yes. Q: And so you must be able to see some potential futures which you and your civilization -- collective you -- would prefer that we don't choose. B: In a sense. Therefore, simply recognize that it is our perception that because we are interacting with you, it is representative of the type of future you have already chosen. Q: Okay. AUD: But only a select few. B: You are the ones that make the selection. It is up to everyone; it is your individual choice. Recognize again that the individuals who have not chosen that vibration are not interacting with us. Q: That's true; they're not here. Right. AUD: How is it possible toŠ B: They certainly do not have to interact with us. They can interact with many different aspects of themselves to, quote/unquote, arrive at the same conclusion. An individual can be living in a fourth density state without ever having heard the term fourth density, metaphysics, or any of the other ideas that we are discussing. They can still live that way, and have chosen the idea of living in that reality when it occurs, totally unconsciously. Q: So your presence here is not merely an origination on your part, but the very fact that you chose to come, we have something to do with? Is that what you're saying? B: As I have always said: you allow us to interact with you by choosing to interact with us in equal vibrations. That is the only way we can interact with you -- and because of your willingness to recognize that, you can now interact with us. Q: But if you're sitting in the rafters, being able to see a period of time on Earth when, let's suppose, no person on EarthŠ B: One moment!! Q: Š you can perceiveŠ B: One moment! Everything and every aspect that you are present to relate to, has to do with you, if you are willing to look at it that way. Integrate everything you are hearing from anyone else. Turn the questions and the answers and the statements around for you, and understand how you relate to it. If you find, in this way, that you have already related to it on your own terms, then simply recognize that if the idea is still something you are perceiving, then there may be other ways in which you can learn from it. Continue. Q: Okay. Sitting up in the rafters, you can observe one of the rooms - let's suppose there is a room, a point in time, as we would call it, in which there was nobody on Earth that was prompted to interact with you. B: All right. Q: And then in another roomŠ B: We can observe that probability, yes. Q: And then we can also look down and see the room which we experience as the now, in which we're interacting with you. B: Yes. (Pause) Q: Oh, I answered my own question: they're going on simultaneously. B: Yes. Q: There was never a point in time when you decided to interact; you're interacting here, but you're not interacting there. B: Correct. We are simply with you, the definition of the interaction. Q: Thank you. B: Thank you! Sharing!

See Also:

Source: