Text: We've been hoodwinked into believing that it is necessary to have 'heat' in order to develop and/or extract 'energy' from our environment. This is important, because 'heat' within our planetary environment is the single most prevalent cause of our global 'melt-down' http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nuenergy/message/13809 a.k.a. global warming. Recent developments have revealed that 'cold' energy formats are available and are proven technologies. What is needed is the appropriate 'knowledgebase' to sustain 'cold' format structures within our environment. We already know about 'cold' electricity, 'cold' fusion, and the 'cold' vacuum of space. Also I might add, we are already familiar with 'heat' pumps which extract 'heat' from the 'cold' ambient during winter in the northeast/west sections of this planet. While it is 'winter' in the northeast [globally] it is 'summer' in the southeast/west sections of the same planet. Thus we realize how hurricanes develop, namely, the planet is providing a 'heat-pump [so to speak] http://weather.jsums.edu/hurricane.htm by releasing its energy in the form of a 'mixing' vortex and reestablishing an equilibrium, an ambient balance if you will, of the thermally induced weather patterns traveling from the Southeast to the Northwest sections of the planet via the rotation and spin of the Earth on its axis. For while it is winter in Argentina and South America, during the months of July, August and September, it is just the beginning of summer in the United States and Canada. This rich mixture of thermally induced weather releases itself via the rotation of the planet, in the form 'vortexes' known as hurricanes over the Atlantic ocean, traveling from the southern regions up towards the northern regions of the Atlantic ocean. Most of our inventions and/or discoveries have literally come from viewing aspects of our 'natural' laws and 'natural' planetary functions, via the empirical [observatory] method. As our 'knowledgebase' developed we discovered additional 'laws' that provided more in-depth approaches to 'see' via 'models' and 'theories' those aspects of known 'laws' requiring 'complex' conceptualizations, such as our 'knowledge' of the [atomic] structure of atoms, and the building blocks [such as the electron activity] of matter, whether it be chemical [induced] interactions of atomically induced interactions. We should thus capitalize upon our knowledge of 'cold' technologies because these just might require less [time] effort and greater [time] output, enabling us to extend our resources further. Our http://www.physics.ohiostate.edu/~p670/Wi04/activity_solutions/Act6b_sol.pdf limited understanding of 'thermodynamics' has been challenged recently, especially, in our knowledge of [perpetual] motion. Newton stated that an object in motion tends to stay in motion [unless challenged or modified]. This is especially true within the vacuum of space-thus refuting those who falsify 'perpetual' motion. If perpetual motion did not exist in [the vacuum of] space-ALL life on planet Earth would cease to exist. The entire construct of the 'creation' functions via 'perpetual' motion-in deed we ALL depend upon the movement [rotation] of galaxies as life-force mechanisms sustaining interactions between planetary and interstellar star activity. The energy of the [apparent] 'wheelworks' of nature abounds forever as a testament [ N. A. Kozyrev ] regarding the 'timelessness' of these interactions. Tom Bearden, http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html [along with Myron Evans, http://www.aias.us/ ] the foremost experts in this endeavor, and whose knowledgebase has been freely given http://www.physicsphotons.org/Wave_Particle16.pdf and available to all who will take the time to explore their research, have provided a wealth of data for [all] who are willing to go beyond currently known structures. Those http://www.worldscibooks.com/series/wssccp_series.shtml that have the ability to discern 'knowledge' achieve 'models' of understanding' previously misunderstood. Never http://www.kluweronline.com/issn/0894-9875/contents forget that 'first foundations' are [first] derived from 'first thoughts' which ultimately become [first] principles upon which vast technologies are erected into 'structured' edifices John Bedini, a close 'ideological/theoretical friend of Dr. Bearden has provided us with significant 'proofs' and demonstrations, along with countless others, whom you may wish to research with the appropriate 'due diligence' and humility of 'students' addressing the 'profs' who have established themselves with rigorous hard work and experimentation. Randell L. Mills, the 'father' of 'blacklightpower,' not only has he established 'the lowered 'round-state' of the hydrogen 'atom' as fact, but has derived a whole new kind of energy field from which to derive NEW energy formats. This is the stuff of Jules Verne, of 'novelties of fact' unparalleled in human history according to such notables as Thomas S. Kuhn the 'father' of 'scientific revolutions' and the 'originator' of 'structures' of scientific knowledge generation and origination. Dr. Randell L. Mills http://www.ctrl.org/sutton/FTIR.March2001.html is the 'father' of a new technology and is establishing the future for all mankind, much like John D. Rockefeller did during the early part of the 20th century. Morgan-Stanley has positioned http://www.blacklightpower.com/management.shtml itself quietly for just such an entry-level 'power' surge. Those that are wise and prudent should 'reexamine' the factual data and prepare themselves for a very interesting ride into the future of all mankind. We are upon the cutting-edge of future technology, while experiencing the death-throws of the previous 'heat' based economies of limited resources. We have now entered into the new [foundational] age of hydrogen-based technologies. This has all been accomplished without the aid of 'governments' and 'infrastructures' because such paradigms of 'novelties of fact' are by their very nature 'counterproductive' to the already 'established' [current] technological atomic and oil based economies. They are viewed as [de facto] http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=302 'interference patterns' to the established norm of the previous 'originators.' Those that say they 'can' and those that say they 'can't' develop these kinds of technologies are [both] correct. For they have individually developed for themselves 'models' and 'structures' defining their capabilities and their knowledge [or lack thereof]. What literally divides them are their 'perceptions' and 'conceptions' of their 'view' of 'reality,' and thus of their innate and inherent 'capabilities.' Belief is a powerful influence affecting discovery and acknowledgement, not to mention the development of the kinds of 'protocols' that are necessary to 'allow' change within 'scientific' structures. Were it not for the atomic scientists, such as Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard, et al, not to mention Edward Teller, we would not have developed the 'atomic' age. For it was 'individuals,' such, as these who were able to 'convince' governments and 'conceive' actual demonstrable 'results' of the effect of 'such' atomic interactions. When one lives within a negative [heat] world-incorporating 'cold' technologies, one requires significant adjustments and viable alternate structured environmental use of 'controlled' technologies. Since the ambient normally requires 'heat' transfer, it is necessary to provide appropriate 'insulation' [vacuum] closing off the 'heat' transfer capability. That is why creating a Low Temperature Phase Change 'engine' is a difficult process-normal attributes [immediately nullify] tend to cancel the 'process' of the phase change [reaction]. In order to have a true LTPC cycle engine-there must be absolute separation from the ambient environment [heat]. The ambient is the energy source, while CO2 is the medium of the phase change encapsulated within an insulated [vacuum] chamber allowing the gradual cycle of liquid-gas-liquid to maintain its 'structured' balance. We now have greater 'knowledge' today regarding fusion reactions that require less 'effort' and greater 'advantage' and at 'room' temperature commonly known today as 'cold fusion,' and 'sonofusion' respectively. There have been more that 600 demonstrable 'cold fusion' proofs verifying the efficacy of 'cold fusion to date. Men like Russ George http://www.shareintl.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_chunveil.html have demonstrated http://www.d2fusion.com/ the efficacy and reality of this 'novel' approach to energy capture. There are countless others who have provided 'answers' to our seemingly insoluble dilemma, what is needed is an open mind, due diligence and humility in our efforts to achieve the seemingly daunting and impossible obtainment of the 'novelty of fact' mechanics of over-unity and 'free' [vacuum] energy commonly referred to as Zero Point Energy or ZPE. Essentially 'energy' systems are being decentralized and focused 'individually' within homes, business, and families. The age of enlightenment has finally reached the 'control paradigm.' All the Best, Leslie R. Pastor PS: If Space is Cold and the Stars are heat sources, how does the 'heat' traverse [the vacuum of] Space and heat the Planets? [The standard answer has been ultraviolet rays of the Sun interacting with the Earth's atmosphere] Do atomic interactions 'create' their own 'atmospheres'? Do nuclear interactions 'structure' atmospheres? How does one 'structure' energy 'transformations' via 'vacuum' constructs? PSS: W. Edwards Deming [the father of quality control] would say 'It is not necessary to change. Survival is not necessary.' Harsh words for a very harsh reality. Read my personal research: Novelties of Fact [Part 1] on W. Edwards Deming Source: W. Edwards Deming [founder: Quality Control] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/energy2000/message/13854 Internet Resource Research Library [Part 2] My Personal Research http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svpvril/message/25161 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/energy2000/message/22601 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jlnlabs/message/32376 http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Educate-Yourself_Forum/message/10366 PSSS: We are now encompassed with formidable 'challenges' that require significant and serious thought regarding current dynamics as they are being formulated to re-control [alter] and reformat our world. For we are now living within a new paradigm, with newer competitors and potential partners, sharing not just our resources, but, our very life-systems. If we wish to remain viable-developmental change IS necessary for our very survival, otherwise we will become superfluous and expendable. PSSSS: The U.S. Patent Office's Primary Examiner, Mr. Allen M. Ostrager initially rejected the Australian Patent Application for the Fischer Cycle Engine because he thought, "...it violated the Second Law of Thermodynamics." Dr. Martin G. Horner, Ph.D. (OXFORD) (Chemistry & Patent Law), Patent Attorney, and the author of the original Australian Fischer Cycle Engine Patents, was able to demonstrate, from his personal observations and experiences, to the satisfaction of the U.S. Patent Office that the Fischer Cycle Engine did produce useful work, and that it did not violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Since that first and only rejection, the U.S. Office of Patents and Trademarks has registered five U.S. Patents pertaining to the Fischer Cycle Engine research and development. Ref: http://www.phact.org/e/z/fischer.htm Tom Bearden refutes http://www.materials.dk/links/A/08/01/ the Second Law of Thermodynamics in a variety of responses to enquiring minds. Source: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/032103.htm http://www.halexandria.org/dward760.htm http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=770 http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=52596 http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/sacred_scientist1.htm Research: W. Edwards Deming http://www.deming.org/ http://www.deming.org/theman/ http://www.lii.net/deming.html http://caes.mit.edu/deming/ http://deming.eng.clemson.edu/pub/den/ http://www.skymark.com/resources/leaders/deming.asp http://www.tpmonline.com/articles_on_total_productive_maintenance/management/deming14steps.htm http://www.quoteland.com/author.asp?AUTHOR_ID=462 Ancient Technology http://www.crystalinks.com/vedic.html American Historical Perspective and Reference http://college.hmco.com/history/us/resources/students/weblinks/ Japanese Historical Perspective and Reference http://www.choices.edu/curriculum_unit.cfm?id=17 Dresden: A Perspective http://www.profsurv.com/ps_scripts/article.idc?id=92 Atomic Energy Age http://www.turkeyland.net/atom.html http://www.eh.doe.gov/ohre/related.html http://www.nvr.org/research_content.php?pro=research&sec=session&subsec=1 http://www.eh.doe.gov/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap10_1.html http://www.atomicarchive.com/Portal/index.shtml http://www.lanl.gov/source/worldview/welcome/history.shtml http://www.worldwar2database.com/html/atombomb.htm http://www.epcc.edu/ftp/Homes/monicaw/borderlands/13_atomic_bomb.htm Leo Szilard http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/122/hiro/scientist.htm Edward Teller http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/10/obituaries/10TELL.html Phase Changes and Refrigeration http://www.chemistry.wustl.edu/~edudev/LabTutorials/Thermochem/Fridge.html Low Temperature Difference Sterling Engine http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/~khirata/academic/kiriki/10wse/ Heat Engine for Space Power Applications [New Power Conversion Cycle] http://content.aip.org/APCPCS/v699/i1/680_1.html http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?2004AIPC..699..680B Liquid Nitrogen [Classroom] Demonstrations http://www.powerlabs.org/ln2demo.htm Tom Bearden answered me regarding the structure of water http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/112403.htm Water [and its Properties] http://www.oceansonline.com/water_props.htm http://www.earthsci.unimelb.edu.au/mars/Water.html http://www.matchrockets.com/water/watermain.html http://www.iserv.net/~chargers/chem/chemsecc.htm http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/ http://www.chem1.com/acad/sci/aboutwater.html http://www.visionlearning.com/library/module_viewer.php?mid=57 http://www.otherpower.com/diamagh2o.html http://14ushop.com/magnets/a_mystery.html http://www.luminet.net/~wenonah/hydro/h2o.htm http://www.svpvril.com/svpweb9.html http://www.eagle-research.com/browngas/fabuses/possib.html Dr. Eugene Mallove: Cold Fusion Expert [In memorandum] http://www.greatdreams.com/mallove.htm http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/032104a.htm http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=754 Electricity and Magnetism http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Electricity%20and%20magnetism Joshua Gulick [Anti-Gravity] [bismuth] http://www.ufomind.com/misc/1999/may/d06-001.shtml http://groups.yahoo.com/group/usa-tesla/messages/4801?viscount=100 http://www.pharmachip.hu/zyx/misztika/ankh.htm [Hungarian] http://www.ufoseek.com/The_Occult/Advanced_and_Obscure_Occulted_Science_L414/ http://www.pararesearchers.org/UFOs/ufoa/ufoa.html http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/project160.html http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/project127.html The Physics of Star Trek http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/Star_Trek_Physics.htm Misc: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Antigravity/messages/1?viscount=100 http://quanthomme.free.fr/catalogue/c10inventeurs.htm http://quanthomme.free.fr/catalogue/c09appareils.htm http://www.freeenergy.co.za/1think/have%20read/have_read.htm http://home1.gte.net/res0k62m/intro.htm http://www.todayinsci.com/cgi-bin/indexpage.pl?http://www.todayinsci.com/10/10_09.htm

See Also:

Source: