Text: In 1957 the broken symmetry of opposite charges was proven by Wu and her colleagues, following its prediction by Lee and Yang shortly before. So revolutionary was this dramatic change in physics, that in an unprecedented move the Nobel Committee awarded the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang in that same year (Dec. 1957) that Wu et al. had proven broken symmetry back in February. Broken symmetry means that "something virtual has become observable". What it means is that the dipolarity charges continually absorb subquantal energy from the virtual state fluctuations of the vacuum, reorder it, coherently integrate it to the quantum level, and abruptly decay back to the start by emitting a real, observable photon. Since the charge continually absorbs virtual energy from the vacuum, the process iterates over and over. Each of these charges acts as a "Feynman ratchet", continually ratcheting up virtual energy from the vacuum into real observable EM energy emission (real observable photon emission). The continually emitted photons establish the external associated macroscopic EM fields and potentials of the charges, at light speed, and continually replenish them at light speed. A static field or potential is not like a "frozen" waterfall, as the textbooks imply. Instead, using Van Flandern's beautiful analogy, a static field or potential is like an "unfrozen" waterfall. Specifically, he said: "To retain causality, we must distinguish two distinct meanings of the term 'static'. One meaning is unchanging in the sense of no moving parts. The other meaning is sameness from moment to moment by continual replacement of all moving parts. We can visualize this difference by thinking of a waterfall. A frozen waterfall is static in the first sense, and a flowing waterfall is static in the second sense. Both are essentially the same at every moment, yet the latter has moving parts capable of transferring momentum, and is made of entities that propagate. . So are . fields for a rigid, stationary source frozen, or are they continually regenerated? Causality seems to require the latter." In recognizing the internal energy flows comprising a field or potential, one has just met the 1957 proof of the Whittaker work, showing that any EM field and potential is an ongoing set of EM energy flows (originating from the source charges). This is totally missing from the electrical engineering model and textbooks, but it is true nonetheless. So every EM system ever built, already is and has been powered by EM energy extracted directly from the seething vacuum by the dipolarity charges in the external source. Every EM field and potential and every observable joule of EM energy in the universe is and has been freely extracted from the vacuum, by the associated source charge(s). If we would just pay to make the dipole once, then let it alone and never allow it to be destroyed again, it would continually furnish us free energy flow in usable form, from now till the end of time. We do not have to discover how to ourselves extract the energy from the vacuum! Every charge in the universe already does it for us, absolutely freely. Just assemble some charge or make a dipole (one will have to pay a little bit once for that), and that beast will then pour out free, usable EM energy from the vacuum forever, if we just let it alone and do not let our silly circuits then destroy it by using half their freely collected potential energy to do so. How stupid would we think a petroleum engineer is, if he insisted on taking half the oil from a big gusher, using the oil to do nothing but turn the valve and cut off the flow, so that we ourselves had to use some more oil to keep opening that shaft and overpowering his efforts to close it! We would also be using more energy or oil than the remaining energy or oil that resulted. Such a petroleum engineer would immediately be branded a raving lunatic and sent packing. Yet that is what we have been taught to do for any EM circuit we build or use. And for every power system, including our national centralized electrical power system. So the first requirement for an overunity EM system is that it must violate the Lorentz symmetry, for at least a significant fraction of the time. In that case, the Lorentz-invariant equations in the textbook as the CEM/EE model cannot and will not describe the operation of the system. Specifically, the circuit will asymmetrically regauge, which means the emergence of a net free force in addition to the absorption of excess free potential energy. Then that net free force can be used to dissipate that free energy to drive electrons through the loads, giving some free powering of the loads. But if we let the dissipated excess potential energy simultaneously drive all the spent electrons back through the back emf of the generator, we destroy the source dipolarity faster than the loads are freely powered. So to restore the dipole so the energy will keep flowing, then we have to pay to keep cranking the shaft of the generator, and crank it ever harder than we power the loads. In short, by the standard and required design of our circuits and systems themselves, we can only get COP1.0. Fortunately, for some permanent magnetic approaches it is simpler than for electrical circuits. E.g., the Takahashi magnetic Wankel engine can readily be built by any competent electrical engineering department, just paying particular attention to the precision construction and precision machining required. It's essentially a rail gun wrapped around almost in a complete circle but not quite. So its back mmf region is reduced to a very short gap distance between the ends of the nearly-closed rail gun, and the time required for the rotor magnet to pass through that back mmf region is very short. Hence one then places a pole piece above that little gap where the back mmf is. And one puts a very small trickle current flowing in a coil with that polepiece, so that - if the current were suddenly increased in the coil - the back mmf in that little gap region would be momentarily overpowered and reversed by the sudden appearance of that extra magnetic field. In the operation of the engine, as the rotor magnet starts and drives around the permanent magnet rail gun section, it continually and freely accelerates, gaining free angular momentum. But facing it is that approaching gap region, where if nothing is done the back mmf will take back all that free angular momentum, killing any "free energy" effect. Obviously we must make some change in that back mmf region, while that rotor magnet passes through it. So just as the rotor magnet starts entering that region, one sharply breaks the tiny-trickle current in the little coil of the pole piece. That in turn abruptly induces the Lenz law effect, and in fact a very sudden and fairly large momentary surge of the current in the same direction will FREELY occur, as is well known. So just as the rotor magnet starts through the back mmf (where all its accumulated free drive energy from accelerating around to that point will normally have to be paid back), suddenly the back mmf is gone or even reversed into another forward mmf, momentarily. And so the rotor passes through in a momentary net zero back emf, or even a momentary extra and free forward mmf. So it completes its rotation without ever having to "pay back" the free angular momentum it accumulated in its rail gun drive portion. Hence that engine will self-rotate and power its own shaft load simultaneously, and we only have to pay for that tiny bit of trickle current and some efficient timing and switching. To make it self-powering, once a model is worked out properly and successfully operating at COP>1.0, it's simple. Merely hang a tiny little generator on the shaft as part of the output that is driven. Let that little generator then furnish the power to that small "trickle current and switching circuit", once the machine is in motion and running at speed. This subtracts only a little bit of the output energy, leaving the remainder to power a slight smaller load. But now the unit is self-powering, and - contrary to conventional wisdom - it is not violating either physics or thermodynamics, once one understands that any EM field and potential is already a set of free ongoing energy flows from the vacuum, extracted and transduced freely by the source charge. It's analogous to discovering a new kind of "solar radiation energy" that is universally and always in the environment, and always available. That's why the Japanese Yakuza suppressed that magnetic Wankel engine, along with the Kawai motor, since they were much more easily replicated by electrical engineering departments. (Machining etc. and precision are most of the problems involved). And one of the goals of the Yakuza is to prevent the West from realizing such things and obtaining free, self-powering electrical power systems. They are one of the groups planning to do some serious interference with our centralized electrical power system in the future, including - if possible - causing a catastrophic collapse of the U.S. and Western World economies. Now to eat the cake and have it also. Contrary to most university teachings, the violation of the hoary old second law of thermodynamics is well known and recognized in several areas by nonequilibrium thermodynamicists. E.g., check Kondepudi and Prigogine, Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures, Wiley, New York, 1998, reprinted with corrections 1999. Areas known to violate thermodynamics are given on p. 459; one such area is simply a sharp gradient. Now one sees that, properly used, a sharp gradient - as evoked judiciously and precisely in the magnetic Wankel engine - can indeed allow the violation of the second law of thermodynamics, and that is already well-known in nonequilibrium thermodynamics of dissipative systems. What this means is that such a second-law violating process, if properly used and applied, can lead to the direct production in the system of negative entropy, even though the old second law states that either the entropy remains the same or increases. Instead, the entropy can reverse and the entropy can decrease, controllably and on order. And that is precisely what the Magnetic Wankel engine does in a nutshell. These days we are strongly recommending to universities and electrical engineering departments that they fund and allow doctoral candidates and post doctoral scientists to build and adjust a magnetic Wankel engine, to prove that energy from the vacuum can be put to performing useful free work. Sooner or later one of the universities is going to build and test such a unit in the name of science, and that hopefully will cause - at long last - a very rapid correction and extension to the hoary old seriously flawed CEM/EE model now being so universally taught. We spoke of electric charges and dipoles; recall also that a "magnetic pole" is just a "magnetic charge". So a magnetic dipole comes under the same discussion. Hope this sheds a little more light on exactly what one is doing when one is experimenting toward COP>1.0 systems freely using excess energy from the vacuum. The energy from the vacuum is already extracted and available in any and every EM circuit; all the charges q already take care of doing that. One is thus trying to overcome that inane Lorentz symmetry in systems and circuits we have all been taught to unwittingly enforce. Unless we break that Lorentz symmetry, then no COP>1.0 systems will result since the silly circuit itself self-enforces Lorentz symmetry and prevents it. With the standard circuit, one is already one's own "worst enemy" as far as usable energy is concerned. The bottom line is that we have always paid the electric power company to engage in a giant wrestling match inside its generators and deliberately lose. And our own electrical engineers have not even known it, nor have they even known what really powers and electrical circuit - though all their textbooks purport to teach that. This kind of idiosyncrasy led Bunge to remark in his Foundations of Physics, p. 176: "...it is not usually acknowledged that electrodynamics, both classical and quantal, are in a sad state." With the escalating energy crisis, it is high time that such Lorentz symmetric approaches get changed once and for all, and that the ubiquitous role of energy from the vacuum be recognized. But sadly it doesn't appear that the scientific community itself will do it, or allow its grad students and post docs to do it. It will have to be done, it seems, by the independent inventors. A small group of physicists now is going after those old Lorentz invariant equations used in various parts of physics, but so far it is only a very small movement, only barely tolerated by the scientific community. Meanwhile, all the powerful financial cartels, industry cartels, and yes, science cartels - are adamantly set to prevent that from happening. No way do they wish to see the present system changed, since the "selling of energy" and its ancillary operations is a multi-trillion dollar business. And that too is sad, since Whittaker already showed us more than a century ago that all EM energy is actually free for the taking. We just have to understand what is involved in more efficiently and freely accepting what nature already freely offers. Best wishes, Tom Bearden -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Leslie R. Pastor [mailto:lrpastor@optonline.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 2:40 AM To: Tom Bearden Subject: Fw: [jlnlabs] Scalar Wave Transmitter Good Morning Tom, Thought you'd like to know what people are saying about you. This is an email from Jean-Louis Naudin's group. Obviously, the never read your book. [I have a copy]. I was hoping for a significant refutation from you. Much of this information was 'fathered' by your 'knowledgebase' and 'due diligence.' I am aware that you are pressed for time. And I realize that you have priorities, as we all do. Like Sir Humphrey Davy, you just might captivate a young Michael Faraday [bright young grad student] and thus motivate 'fresh' sources of input and directions. All the Best, Leslie R. Pastor -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Research: Edmund Taylor Whittaker http://rgrace.org/pdfact/1904.pdf Thomas E. Bearden http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/t-59158_Thomas_E._Bearden_and_his_thoughts.html The Fogel Transistor and other [Gabriel Kron] important documentation. http://www.eskimo.com/~ghawk/fogal_device/notes.htm Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/vanflandern.htm http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Bearden_25.doc James Clerk Maxwell http://www.cheniere.org/references/maxwell.htm Antoine Priore [Reverse Time-Waves] Healing With Energy http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/042503.htm http://www.explorepub.com/articles/energetics.html http://www.explorepub.com/articles/energetics_notes.html Floyd A. Sweet [VTA] http://www.rexresearch.com/sweet/1nothing.htm Historical Background of Scalar EM Weapons http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm http://www.highstrangeness.tv/articles/scalar.php http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/history-of-directed-energy-weapons.htm Some Characteristics of the Phase Conjugate Wave http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/pc_wave.htm Super Potential Theory http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/020204.htm http://twm.co.nz/beard_weapon.htm http://montalk.net/science/109/scalar-superpotential-theory http://montalk.net/SST.pdf Scalar Electromagnetics and Weather Control http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/092903.htm http://www.stevequayle.com/News.alert/04_Tech/041231.Beard_weather.html Lee, Yang & Wu 1957 http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1957/press.html http://www.physics.hku.hk/~tboyce/ss/topics/women/ascent.html http://ccreweb.org/documents/parity/parity.html#Lee%20and%20Yang http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/WuChien-Shiung.html http://search.eb.com/women/articles/Wu_Chien-Shiung.html Eugene Mallove http://www.pureenergysystems.com/obituaries/2004/EugeneMallove/LastMessage040513/ http://www.virtualschool.edu/mon/SocialConstruction/ColdFusionPrimer.html http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=118 http://www.cosmicparadigm.com/Eugene_Mallove.html http://www.newenergymovement.org/mallove_eulogy.htm http://www.lightparty.com/Energy/WarColdFusion.html http://prorev.com/coldfusion.htm Cold Fusion: Past, Present and Future http://open-site.org/Science/Physics/Modern/Cold_Fusion/ DOE Fails to Present Cold Fusion Fairly http://www.lenr-canr.org/News.htm Misc: http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm Bearden For Beginners http://www.eskimo.com/~ghawk/fogal_device/glossary.htm http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/References/glossary1.pdf http://kjmaclean.com/ZeroPointEnergy.html http://www.factbites.com/topics/Electromagnetic-field http://www.factbites.com/topics/Scalar http://www.rexresearch.com/home.htm http://www.overunity.com/ http://www.broandrew.com/suppression.html

See Also:

Source: