Text: From: lrpastor@optonline.net Subject: [svpvril] Eugene Mallove Knew Truth Regarding Cold Fusion And Was Not Afraid To Acknowledge That Truth Date: May 18, 2005 5:23:08 PM MDT Eugene Mallove http://www.the7thfire.com/EL/FreeEnergyBreakthrough.htm was 'silenced' because he knew the truth and because he was a threat while he remained alive. The Cold Fusion process is important because it can make 'cheap' tritium at room temperature. The CF process will only be allowed to furnish what is wanted by the 'control' paradigm. But CF will never be allowed to provide 'free energy' because then 'freedom' is not an option by the controllers. The new pebble-bed nuclear reactors http://fincher.org/weblog/pivot/entry.php?id=78 to be used in building http://www.pharmaciaretirees.com/pebble_bed_reactors.htm hundreds of new nuclear power plants use helium for heat exchange etc. And helium is expensive and in short supply. In deuterated cold fusion experiments, one of the products widely produced in the successful experiments is the production of alpha particles - i.e., He4. So it would appear that the powerful cartel comprised of parts of the nuclear industry and parts of the science community might like to "appropriate" that reaction (see the actual nuclear reaction equation in Tom Bearden's book [Energy From the Vacuum], in the chapter on cold fusion) and call it "hot fusion", while they are suppressing the 'dirty old' cold fusion. Read Chapter (10) Ten. http://www.cheniere.org/sales/order_by_credit_card.htm If that speculation is true, then certainly they could not have successfully done that if Mallove lived. He had too much scientific stature, was too savvy about the cartels, and also had appreciable respect in the non-nuclear scientific community at large. So Mallove would not have let that occur without revealing the smoking gun involved in the suppression of cold fusion. In short, Mallove could have wrecked the entire plan, given that such plan actually was contemplated. The cartel already has convinced President Bush to back its plans, and - unless something intervenes - a great deal of U.S. taxpayer money (something like a trillion dollars) is going to be spent building hundreds of new pebble-bed reactor nuclear power plants. All of which I might add are vulnerable to potential terrorist attack. Wake Up and Understand the Reality of What has Transpired. Cold Fusion has been verified, proven, and understood, but now it is being suppressed for all time. Because CF would set you 'free.' What amazes me, is that the general public never demands the truth regarding the 'energy' crises, never questions the authorities, and absolutely accepts the coming collapse of our oil age without even a whimper. Once the oil stops flowing, it will be the end of civilization as we have known it. The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator is a reality, which can be had for a mere fraction of what we are spending on the huge Tokomaks. Which are worthless 'junk' compared to other available 'energy' systems. Our global community is headed towards a catastrophe unless we change directions soon. Read: Energy From the Vacuum: Concepts and Principles [BEARDEN] Tom Bearden in a recent email explains how 'energy' is 'free.' "In 1903 Whittaker rigorously showed that any scalar potential is actually comprised of sets of ongoing longitudinal EM wave flows, in pairs. In 1904 he showed that any EM field or wave pattern is comprised of two scalar potentials with impressed differential functions. This latter paper initiated the field presently called "superpotential theory", with later contributions by various scientists. If one takes the two base potentials in the 1904 paper, and first decomposes them via Whittaker's 1903 work, and then applies the differential functions of the second paper, then one has it. All EM fields, potentials, waves, etc. decompose into sets of ongoing longitudinal EM energy flows, with impressed differential functions. The astounding result is that EM energy is free! Any charge or dipole continuously and freely establishes its associated fields and potentials, and each of those is a set of ongoing free EM energy flows. The fact that every EM field and potential (including all so-called "static" EM fields and potentials) is a free flow of EM energy extracted from the local vacuum, does not appear in any electrical engineering textbook. Most EE professors will strongly resist the idea, but it is easily demonstrated experimentally (just assemble some charge or a dipole instantly or nearly so, and with pre-arranged instruments record the steady outflow are light speed of real EM energy, continuing so long as the charge and dipole remain). The charges and dipoles in the matter that has been around since the creation of the world have been steadily and continuously and freely pouring out real EM energy, for some 13.7 billion years, and they have not run down yet. In quantum field theory, which is far better than the hoary old seriously flawed electrical engineering model, there are four photons prescribed and available. With propagation along the Z-axis, oscillation of the energy in the photon - and thus its polarization - can occur in any one of several directions. If it oscillates along the x axis, transversely to the line of propagation, that's a transverse photon. Oscillation along the y-axis is obviously also a transverse photon. Oscillation back and forth along the line of motion (like an accordion) is a longitudinally polarized photon, or for short a "longitudinal photon". Oscillation along the time axis is a time polarized or "scalar" photon. Neither the longitudinal nor scalar photon can be observable individually. But the couplet of the two is observable as common voltage. So every time one uses voltage and voltage spikes, one uses both longitudinal EM photons and longitudinal waves, as well as time-polarized photons and waves. That is standard quantum field theory, which is presently the prevailing theory for much or most of physics. To understand how energy can "oscillate" over on the time axis, one needs to realize something about a physics model. The choice of "fundamental" units in such a model is totally arbitrary. It is perfectly permissible (and valid) to make a complete physics model with only a single fundamental variable - the physicists already do it and use it; see discussions in Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second edition 1975 and his Third edition in 1999 also. So calling something "time" or "energy" or "mass" is totally arbitrary in general. The fundamental units used are usually chosen for convenience and to ease calculations etc. E.g., if one chooses to make his physics model with only a single fundamental unit, say, "the joule", then everything else becomes a function of energy. After Einstein and the atom bomb, everyone is comfortable with saying that "mass is energy". But most are still not comfortable saying that "time is energy". But certainly that can be justified, merely by choosing the proper model. But then length is energy also, and so on. Obviously such a model can get very complicated, but it does give all the correct answers and is as valid as the most commonly used one. It's just a lot more awkward in the general case, though correct. So a more convenient model with various carefully selected fundamental units is usually used. Now let's examine the classical EM model and the electrical engineering model (the CEM/EE model). Sadly, the model is horribly flawed and riddled with falsities. We usually point out some dozen or so falsities - such as: it still assumes the old material ether falsified in 1887; it assumes forces and force fields in space which is blatantly false, as pointed out by eminent scientists such as Feynman, Wheeler, Bunge, etc.; it assumes a flat spacetime (falsified in 1916). It assumes an inert vacuum (falsified since at least 1930 and the Dirac Sea view of the vacuum, together with the quantum mechanical view). Maxwell's actual original theory was set forth in an 1865 paper, and it contains 20 quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns. Maxwell caught so much harsh criticism from his publisher of his 1873 book A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism that he himself began deliberately curtailing and simplifying his own theory that had been published in the first edition of his treatise. He had completed drastically simplifying about 80% by the time he died in 1879 of stomach cancer. For the second edition published in 1881 after his death, that part of the first edition was replaced with Maxwell's own simplification. Similarly in the third edition, with added comments etc. Then in the 1880s Heaviside, Gibbs, and others ripped the quaternions apart, using vector algebra (which Heaviside and Gibbs helped formulate). This was a greatly "watered down" treatment of Maxwell's original theory. What today is taught in university as "Maxwell's equations" are no such thing. They are actually Heaviside's equations and Heaviside's notation. Then Lorentz in the 1890s put the final coup de grace on it, by symmetrically regauging even the watered down equations of Heaviside. See Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, ibid. for the actual symmetrical regauging. That action unwittingly and arbitrarily discarded all asymmetrical Maxwell systems (simply put, those that would otherwise receive excess energy freely from their active spacetime or vacuum environment, and also produce an excess free net force to freely dissipate that excess energy to get some free power in the loads). Lorentz regauging made the equations even much simpler, and allowed the use of Lorentz-invariant equations which are also much easier to solve and get analytical solutions, rather than having to use horrid numerical methods. Note that Heaviside also hated potentials, thought they were "mystical", and stated they should be "murdered from the theory". He almost succeeded in murdering them, but not quite - leaving the magnetic vector potential and the scalar potential. Well, Maxwell's original theory also had errors, as we know today but no one could have known back then! It assumed the material ether and those force fields in space - everyone at the time believed in that material ether, and believed in forces in space (basic mechanics told them that a separate force vector in space acts on a separate mass, which has been false for 400 years as is well-known and pointed out by - again - many scientists such as Feynman, Wheeler, Bunge etc). Maxwell even wrote a mechanical model of the ether, complete with gears and wheels, etc. But Maxwell favored the potentials, giving them a prominent role. Today it is known and accepted that it is the potentials that are real, and the fields are naught but distortions or changes in potentials. But for decades, the potentials were believed to be only mathematical conveniences, and not real. The rise of electrical engineering also gave the rise of a "standard way" of doing circuits, and that way was paralyzing from the beginning. We have all been taught to leave the "external" source of potential connected to its own external circuit while current flows. A little examination shows that this results in a circuit, which uses half of its freely collected potential energy to destroy the dipolarity in the source, cutting off the flow of potential energy. In short, this inane but universal circuit and practice results in systems that self-enforce Lorentz's symmetrical regauging, so that the system cannot produce COP>1.0 from its own regauging. Regauging itself (change of potential and thus of the potential energy of the systems being modeled) is absolutely free, as guaranteed by the Gauge Freedom axiom of modern quantum field theory. Look at it this way: If you change the potential (the voltage) only of a circuit or system, allowing no current to flow while the potential is freely flowing over the circuit and potentializing charges q, then absolutely no work is done but the circuit has gained lots of additional FREE potential energy. The simple equation is W = Vq, where W is the energy collected freely from voltage V when it potentializes charges q. If no current flows, that excess potentialization is "for free" because no power develops and no work is done without current flow. So from any voltage source, you can freely collect as much energy as you wish, if you have enough q available and if you permit no current to flow while the circuit is being potentialized. But if you then leave the source still connected when the charges q are unpinned and current starts to flow, you find that the back emf and forward emf are equal. Thus exactly half the free energy collected is used only to ram the spent (depotentialized) charges back up through the back emf of the generator, scattering the separated charges and destroying the dipolarity (and the potential between its terminals). The other half of the collected free energy is dissipated in the external circuit's loads and losses, which means - for a real circuit with real losses - less than half gets used to usefully power loads. Well, COP is defined as the total useful work out, divided by the operator's input of energy that he paid for. To produce (or restore) that dipole (i.e., force the charges inside the generator apart, in order to form a dipolarity between the generator terminals, which is what produces the potential or voltage difference), it requires at least as much energy as was used to scatter the dipole charges and thus to destroy the potential and its flow. So then one has to crank the shaft of the generator again, putting in some more mechanical energy (which does nothing at all to power the external circuit). Cranking the shaft of the generator does not power the circuit or loads! So what does it do? First, one must recognize the rigorous definition of work: it is the change of form of energy. Mere change of magnitude of energy in the same form, is not work but only energy transfer. But change of form of X joules of energy is X joules of work. Many textbooks still get lost in applying the work-energy theorem, and very few really make clear just what work is. Or energy either, for that matter. (Feynman in his three volumes of sophomore physics points out that we really do not know what energy itself is!). So the mechanical input energy to the shaft of the generator is transduced in form to magnetic field energy inside the generator as it rotates. This is a change of form of energy and requires work. And that is all that cranking the shaft of the generator does. It gets us the necessary magnetic field energy inside the generator. So what happens to the magnetic field energy now having been produced inside the generator? It is dissipated on the charges right there inside the generator, to force positive charges toward one terminal and negative charges toward the other, forming the source dipole. With that, the magnetic energy transduced from the rotating shaft energy is dissipated. Again, it did nothing to power the circuit or the load, but it made the source dipolarity. Of course, if we leave the external circuit connected while those charges are being forced apart, then they themselves are forcing apart the charges out there in the circuit, between the positive line and the negative line. If we just potentialize the generator with the external circuit "frozen", we don't have to "push on all the electrons" out there in that external circuit. Well, once that silly potential is formed between the terminals of the generator, it is a steady flow of EM energy, as shown by Whittaker in 1903 and 1904. In other words, if we will act intelligently and leave that potential alone, and do not ram current back through the back emf of the generator, that "static" potential will continue its set of energy flows freely and indefinitely. It will continue to output real EM energy flow steadily. Yet now we need not be cranking the shaft of the generator, or inputting any energy to those separated charges in that dipole between the terminals. So where did the energy come from that is flowing in that potential that is between the ends of the dipole and flowing on out in space along the conductors of the external circuit, once the dipole is formed? It came from and comes from the local vacuum, via the source charges in that dipole, that were separated to make that dipolarity.

See Also:

Source: