Text: In a recent 'Cold Fusion' http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion overview the manner and method of the 'cold fusion' introduction upon the world scientific community is claimed to have been controversial and unique from the usual methods of investigatory review. Yes, indeed it was unique, and yes, also indeed, it was controversial-but when you consider the fantastic 'nature' of the claim with its 'extraordinary' and controversial claim of achievement at 'room temperature'-you begin to realize that Drs. Pons and Fleischmann were making and declaring 'breakthrough' [scientific] research-unparalleled in human history. They, as history has ultimately proven, provided the modern world with a new 'novelty of fact' that could not be explained with the then current 'research methods' of the twentieth (20th) century. Their statement-at the time appeared laughable, yes, and outright 'comical.' And under such circumstance, it would have been absolutely impossible to have overcome the inertial and myopic intransigence of the stodgy and staid 'resolve' of the imbedded festering 'scientific community' who resembled mere 'parasites' rather than learned and educated men of science. The 'parasitic' nature of the current 'scientific community' has never been addressed-by anyone. They have been accepted as the 'status quo' and have been given substantial access to the unlimited 'largesse' of the federal government running into the 'billions of dollars' annually for the last thirty (30) years, who like 'pigs feeding at the trough' have availed to themselves unparalleled fiefdoms at the expense of the rest of the community. Their failed attempts at creating 'hot fusion' chambers known as 'tokomaks' costing billions of dollars to build and further billions to maintain-today appear almost 'laughable,' if it were not tragic that this is the very group who scorned and laughed at Messr's., Dr. B. Stanley Pons, professor of chemistry at the University of Utah, and Dr. Martin Fleischmann of the University of Southampton in England, when they presented their 'novelty of fact.' Indeed, both of these 'historic' men of true science were railroaded out of their positions of prominence-as a result of their audacity to circumvent the 'intransigence' of the 'scientific' peer-reviewed system-when they went 'public.' Could it be that there is much more to this story than meets the eye? Why would two prominent men of science with impeccable records and substantial qualifications to boot-risk everything, including their careers-just to prove that you could have 'nuclear reactions at room temperature?' Why risk your tenure-your security-your reputation-and ultimately your sanity-unless there was a bigger picture, a greater reality, and an ultimate truth. Extraordinary claims, especially those declared by Pons and Fleischmann, required extraordinary proofs. These two gentleman stated that they had achieved 'nuclear reactions at room temperature' on a tabletop under ordinary lab conditions-a remarkable statement. A statement-so profound, that it shattered the known 'paradigm' of acceptable 'science'-ultimately challenging the very foundations upon which the current and former edifice of 'science' had prevailed since the early 1940's under Einstein, Fermi and Szilard. But as you will see from my research, the proofs are readily available to those who are willing to recognize and openly confess the reality of Nature-and of Nature's laws. For indeed most 'science' is http://peacecountry0.tripod.com/cold_fusion.htm merely the attempt at duplication of known 'natural' occurrences within the known 'natural' world all around us. All the Best, Leslie R. Pastor Personal Research: http://quanthomme.free.fr/energielibre/fusion/liensff.html PS: Nuclear Reactions transpire all around us within the living natural world among plant life commonly referred to as transmutation. Research: [Introduction] The controversy of a 'star in a jar'. http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/science/050399sci-cold-fusion.html Pro-Fusion and Con-Fusion http://www.npl.washington.edu/AV/altvw36.html An Embarrassing Editorial http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/43nature.html Another Testimony http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/132martin.html A Judges' Verdict [Italy] http://www.padrak.com/ine/CFLIBEL.html What is Cold Fusion? http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/courses/classes/NE-24/cold_fusion.htm http://www.answers.com/topic/cold-fusion A Cold Fusion Primer http://www.virtualschool.edu/mon/SocialConstruction/ColdFusionPrimer.html When Discovery and Invention Don't Mix http://www.iath.virginia.edu/~meg3c/id/TCC313/etheric.html The Return of Cold Fusion http://www.halplotkin.com/SFGate015.htm http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/project173.html http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/03/25/tbltpfusion.DTL Excess Heat http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?ColdFusion Cold Fusion: The Experimental Evidence [Book] Dr. Edmund Storms http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/current.html Peter Hagelstein: Warming Up To Cold Fusion [MIT] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54964-2004Nov16.html Alternative Energy: The Cold Fusion http://www.world-mysteries.com/sci_coldfusion.htm Cold Fusion [links] Data http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/ Executive Summary Regarding Cold Fusion http://www.ncas.org/erab/execsumm.htm Tom Bearden and Eugene Mallove Correspondence Regarding Cold Fusion http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/032104a.htm Jean-Louis Naudin's Verification of Cold Fusion http://jlnlabs.online.fr/cfr/html/cfr10.htm http://jlnlabs.online.fr/cfr/index.htm Is the Earth A Cold Fusion Reactor? http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf064/sf064g08.htm [Evidence] Eugene Mallove http://www.cosmicparadigm.com/Eugene_Mallove.html http://www.evworld.com/archives/interviews2/mallove1.html James Patterson http://www.alumni.ca/~zhan4m0/Support.htm Data Verses Dogma http://www.pureenergysystems.com/news/2004/04/26/ColdFusionDogma.html Russ George http://sci-phys-plasma.caeds.eng.uml.edu/1997/03-97-58.htm http://www.shareintl.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_chunveil.html http://www.d2fusion.com/ http://discuss.foresight.org/critmail/sci_nano/4909.html Misc: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LonchamptGexcessheata.pdf [Excess Heat Measurements] http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BushBFmethodsofg.pdf http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Alternative-Energy-Cold-Fusion.htm http://www.pureenergysystems.com/obituaries/2004/EugeneMallove/LeslieRPastor.htm http://www.evg-ars.narod.ru/shauberg1.htm http://users.pandora.be/wouter.termote/Links_from_others.htm Cold Fusion: The Secret Energy Revolution by Antony C. Sutton [1925-2002] http://www.gsreport.com/articles/art000004.html http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_6_8_9.html http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_6_4_8.html http://www.antonysutton.com/suttonbibliography.html http://www.ctrl.org/sutton/suttonFTR.html http://www.skattabrain.com/books-allabout-Cold-Fusion.php

See Also:

Source: