Text: Cold Fusion and the Unified Field Q: First of all, it's nice speaking with you again. It's becoming like Wednesday is the first day of my week, so all the ideas I pick up here I carry along until next week. But anyway, we talked a little bit about sound and light. And one of the problems in physics and chemistryŠ B: One of the what in physics? Q: One of the problems. B: Problems! Q: Well, they haven't reached a final solution as toŠ B: There never will be. Q: Oh! You know what I'm going to ask? B: Understand in this way, that a problem is only a situation you will not allow to change shape. And in this sense, it is simply that there are understandings, situations, and perspectives. They always change, for change is the only constant in any equation. Q: There's nothing permanent except change. B: Thank you. Q: So much for that question. B: Thank you! They will, however, come to some understandings that are reflective of some of the ideas they do wish to experience, in terms of the unified field ideas. Q: So it goes back to, you know, you get the result that your experiment is designed to find. B: Yes. Q: Okay, that's what I was talking about. Okay, another thing. Last week we briefly mentioned -- and again Monday you briefly mentioned -- the process you call cold fusion. Would you elaborate on that for us? B: No. Q: That's simple. B: Simply in this way, the idea can be, for now, looked at as an opportunity for two matrices to inter-link along lines that express the common relationship. Q: What type of relationship? Magnetic? Electric? Conscious? I see: within the crystals themselves. And we're just beginning to explore those things. B: It is a matter of, where there was one identity and another separate identity forming a third identity, that, in and of itself contains the aspects of the two -- but as a single identity. That is the relationship between them. In other words, if this may make it clearer: you have one object, and you have another object. Now understand that in your day-to-day perception, the reason you experience the idea that this is one object, and that is another object, is actually the result of what you actually recognize on another level to be the interrelationship between them. It is the interrelationship that is really there, and the two objects are projected polarity illusions of the actual reality -- which is really the relationship between them. It is in allowing that relationship to be the solid reality, and the reflections being the illusion, that allows you the cold fusion idea. Q: So again, it's because of our idea of reality that holds us back in this process. B: In a sense, yes. Q: So the cold fusion really would be literally a third metal, if you willŠ B: Yes. Q: Not so much from an atomic change, but rather from a matrix social change. B: Yes, yes. Q: Hmm. Thank you. B: Thank you! Q: When you were talking about the cold fusion, I had something that occurred to me just now that I'd like to shareŠ B: All right. Q: Š and get your reflection. I've spent consistently more and more time in the last few weeks working on the relationship between the strong nuclear forces, gravitational and magnetic forces, and trying to pull consciousness into that mechanism. B: All right. Do not forget the hyper-charging that you have recently created. Q: Yes. And the thing that occurred to me is that in an expression that would bring the equations together on the four different kinds of energy levels, and would in fact unite all of those... that that combined with the concept of a gravitational field and the whole phenomena of black holes, and the plasma container for being able to produce a fusion reaction... what you could call, I guess, a cold fusion reaction, if you relateŠ B: Now, you understand that what we are terming cold fusion has nothing at all to do with what you understand to be fusion on your planet -- at all. Q: Okay, howŠ B: It is not an atomic fusion process, in that way. It is an identifying of matrixes within the foundational template of existence itself. Q: Well, in that sense, I'm thinking in terms of the actual 3D manifestation of what could be a fusion reaction as the result of the 4D equations that would relate to bringing the unified field (-- --?) together. Is that a wrongŠ is that a wrong direction? B: 'Tis not wrong direction, but it is simply a different idea. Q: Oh! B: From what we are discussing. Q: Well, let me continue andŠ B: All right. Q: Because it occurred to me that if -- we can make gravity waves now. B: All right. Q: And if we have a shell -- and the big problem with creating, in essence, unlimited energy, has to do with not being able to contain the heat of the plasma away from the container itself. If we understood the equations that relate the four basic elemental forces, i.e., the unified field, and somehow, could combine those inter- gravitational spherical energy that could in factŠ B: Then your fusion reaction that you are after would seem immediately obsolete. For a new type of emergence of energy would be seen. Q: Yes, well, that's what occurred. Because it seems to me if you could create that, you could in essence drop an electron into it and it would fall to the center with greater and greater acceleration and virtually disappear, as though in a black hole -- thereby releasing enormous amounts of energy. B: Yes, that is one utilization. Although you will understand this: in one type of modulation of that particular field that you can create, the field interacting upon itself at 90-degree tensor vectors will, in and of itself, provide you with a new type of energy that can be utilized beyond anything you think can be controlled now. Q: True. It wouldn't even use third density material, would it? B: No. Q: It would be... as third density material in fact disappears in the gravity well of a black hole, so would that appear, in a sense... energy in reverse is what... am I getting it? B: Yes! Energy, structured energy, yes. Structured energy -- without material form. You follow me? Q: Oh, yes. It's a template, isn't it? B: It is a manifestation, yet again, on top of the template. Q: Ah! B: The template itself is not experiential in third density. Nor even, in that way, in fourth. It is simply, let us say, a more closely aligned reflection of the template, however. Q: So once we get the equations -- and they're known -- and once we can in fact unify them, all we're really doing is going in reverse. Because the one thing modern physics doesn't explain is the black hole; and the feeling is that the unified field will, in fact, explain it. And all we do is -- if you solve the equation, you know -- if you know X, you find Y, and if you know Y, you've got it. B: All right. You will understand that there is no such thing as a black hole without a white one. Q: Right. B: And what you will be perceiving in the creation of this non- material energy flux matrix, will be that it is convoluting inwardly and outwardly simultaneously. Q: Right. It's like picking up the backside of the black hole. B: All right, yes. To a degree. It will seem, in a sense, to violate what you hold to be some conservation laws -- though it will not be. Q: Right. B: But the immediate effect is that it will seem to be, in your terminology as you have called it, holding itself up by its own bootstraps. Q: Right, Well, the black hole already blows the theory in all of modern physics anyway. B: All right. Q: So it wouldn't be unreasonable to assume on the other side, there is that... B: All right. Q: ... polarity. B: Yes. What you can even say about this phenomenon which you can create is that, in a sense, you are actually creating a device that exemplifies the energy of polarity itself, in a very raw state. Q: Mhmm. B: It is a demonstration of polarity acting upon your physical universe. Thank you. Sharing!

See Also:

Source: