Re: Bearden on Bedinis' motors

Norman Wootan ( normw@airmail.net )
Thu, 13 Apr 2000 07:22:08 -0500

Hi! Ken et al, Too bad we don't have the old KeelyNet BBS message
base from the days of the TOD circuit available for you to read for
Bert Pool and I performed the long wire experiment you are alluding
to. Basically the question was whether an LED would light at the end
of a wire of a length such that based on the switching rate it was
impossible for an electron flow to establish before the switch
opened. We found that the LED did in fact light even though the
switch was open at that instant. If you assume that the fastest
possible rate of travel is (c) light speed, even though we know it is
some value below (c), in a nano second the electron flow would cover
a distance of 11.75 inches. We used a wire length of 1000 feet and
switched at a rate so that it was impossible for the electron flow to
establish before the source to load switch opened. This experiment
led to the development of the "FireFly" circuit that Bert came up with
which was a variation of the TOD circuit. We found that the circuit
performed some rather interesting feats that are still unexplained.
By carefully measuring source current from the battery (remained
constant) we were able to load the output of the circuit with many
LEDs with no change on the input side of the circuit. This whole
experiment was based on Bearden's theory of the source providing the
potential only and the copper conductor provided the electron flow
based on displacement inertia which explains how the LED lights with
the source disconnected from the circuit. I believe that Jerry has
the "FireFly" circuit in the archives somewhere. Joel and I got
heavely engaged with the MRA about this time so never explored how the
circuit worked other than Tom Bearden's explanation. Interesting how
things run "full circle" back around to the basic premise laid down by
Tom and demonstrated by John Bedini in his Tesla Brandt switch. Hmmm
Norm
PS: By the way, I built all of the devices that we have discussed
lately and demonstrated them at Jerry's Vangard Science Discussion
Group meetings here in Dallas. If you go to the Tesla Society Museum
you will see my Adams Motor there. Hint, the secret is in the
negative going spikes.

"Carrigan, Ken" wrote:

> Jer,
>
> >If these short duration driving pulses in this motor design
> >do the same amount of work as regular AC but over a longer
> >period of time, then wouldn't it have to be overunity?
> >
>
> In reading Beardens email over and over <g> and from his other
> posts or writeups, he is concentrating on 'vacuum' energy and
> the conjugate side of real power. I would term it 'image' or
> 'imaginary' part as in sqrt(-1)? Wonder where this fits into
> the physical word or vacuum energy?
>
> Anyway... YES! There is two sides to what is being stated and
> alluded to. What I am interested in, and I think Keelynet, is
> the overunity portion or 'free energy' or even COP>1 which is
> really not overunity in the true sense.. but rather takes into
> account renewable energy.. which is fine with me too! <g>
>
> If I read Bearden correct it is the FAST switching or outrunning
> of electron/ion flow. In copper wire, the 'classical' electrons
> flow somewhat slower than 'c', and at higher frequencies such
> as transients the flow is along the outside of copper at some
> penetration of skin depth. I wonder is the wire length from the
> load to batteries makes a difference? Papers from Bearden long
> along stated that iron or rusty trash wire was the best as it
> delayed the electron transport allowing 'potential' to arrive
> but no current flow. Seems Johns Tesla switch or Ron Brants switch
> uses only this philosophy of switching to achieve a charged
> battery with only capacitors changed from parallel to series!
> And THIS was shown to operate at Tesla Show, sponsored by IEEE
> and Ford.. etc? This is what I want to try to duplicate as it
> required no winding of coils, magnet placements, shafts, etc.
>
> Once of your long ago emails (many probably) discussed Tesla and
> his car, running off the aether from only some tubes that he
> picked up at some local "Radio Shack" and small antenna, which
> maybe even was not an antenna. Tesla was into spark gaps,
> transients, capacitor charges, and of course coils! I have a
> hard time seeing Tesla, the man who invented AC electricity,
> faking a running electric car running off the aether. Maybe
> it is as simple as SWITCHING THREE batteries, or one battery
> and two capacitors on and off. Dirac also was VERY influenced
> with electron interactions with electromagnetic fields and with
> electrons in the negative energy states as his Dirac Theory
> states.
>
> >I need to build the 10 year old girls machine...winding the
> >coils is the only tedious part..<g>...
> >
> Exactly! Time to go to basement and dust off the shelves
> and get some experiments rolling. Even a 5 volt 1.0F cap
> with a dead 1.5 volt battery should work great! Provided
> switching rates of thousands of dV/dt can be achieved, and
> some crapping lengthy cable to hook it all up with! <g>
> v/r Ken Carrigan
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------