I know, it certainly says a lot about validity though some
of these guys don't really take care of themselves properly,
financially speaking, so wind up broke and having to scrape
by for a living.
Personally, I'd rather a claimant temporarily disappear if
the device fails or they can't get it going,
rather than turn into a con artist and keep making claims of
success to draw people to their 'knew' site (kind of like
detergents, 'new', 'improved', always something to try to
hook you) to sell them more junk
that either has nothing to do with their original claims
(that always fail) or is a jump to something else they can
lift or claim as theirs so they can sell it.
In McKie's case, he contacted me about 3 years ago I believe
but can't find the notes of the conversation...he said there
had been a breakthrough or something that had him very
excited.
The guy has a patent already and this new one might reveal
something useful. If he has a working machine, it would be
great to bring it to a conference and let everyone come up
and inspect it, then measure it.
I'll never be content with anything LESS than a completely
self sustained unit that doesn't involve batteries or
outside power...except possibly to start it up, but it has
to continue to run itself AND drive a load.
As I understand it, the patent isn't granted yet, but it is
supposed to have been applied for.
Bearden told me years ago he thought McKie partly had it and
this switching tank circuits back and forth seems to tie in
with the 'final secret' claims of tapping potential and not
cancelling current.
We will see...
"Carrigan, Ken" wrote:
>
> Jer,
> One would think that from Jun 1993 (or earlier I'm sure) that
> McKie would have something working, photo's, some performance
> data, something substantial. Hummm
-- KeelyNet - From an Art to a Science Jerry W. Decker - http://www.keelynet.com/discussion archives http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite, TX 75187 - 214.324.8741------------------------------------------------------------- To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com> with the body text: leave Interact list archives and on line subscription forms are at http://keelynet.com/interact/ -------------------------------------------------------------