Re: James Griggs: O/U heating device on the market?

Norman Wootan ( normw@airmail.net )
Fri, 04 Feb 2000 19:28:59 -0600

Hi! Chuch, Jerry, Ken etal : Cold Fusion magazine by Gene Mallove has alll the
info on the NASA test of the Griggs Pump. If you go to the IBM Patent site you
will see that "Perkins" recently received the O-U patent on the pump ahead of
Griggs. At the time I started researching and building the rotary pump unit
(perkins) back in 1994 there were 7 different patents on this heating technology
dating back to the 1920's. Now there are 10 different patents along this
design. The way I see it just maybe the definition of the calorie is flawed.
Remember it was originally determined by heating water via stirring with apaddle
in a closed vessel ?????????? Norm

Chuck Henderson wrote:

> Hi Chris et al,
>
> I am not certain, and perhaps Jerry can verify
> one way or the other, but I beleive that this device
> is one that Hal Putoff was trying to validate as being
> over unity. The results that Hal came up with were
> negative for OU. I haven't seen anything recentlly
> about the device, save for DM's recent post to the
> list.
>
> Later...
>
> Chuck...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chris Lautre <C_Lautre@emt.ee>
> To: <Interact@keelynet.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 8:52 AM
> Subject: RE: James Griggs: O/U heating device on the market?
>
> > Hi there all
> > Yes I have met Griggs and have tried to get a licence to manufacture these
> > pumps under licence here in Eastern Europe.
> >
> > I believe they work and was in the process of getting a demo system built
> > and sent here
> > to convice companies who were interrested in buying into the licence.
> >
> > Initially I wanted to know approximately how much it would be so that I
> > would not be waisting peoples time if it was way too rich for me.
> > Griggs said that the licence would be in the US$100 K ball park.
> > after some discussions a rough contract was sent to me with a price of
> > US$750K
> > plus minimum anual fees of about US$50K to US$100K.
> >
> > I gave it all up as just totally over the top for an undeveloped country
> > with a population of 1.5 million.
> > If you scaled up the annual charges by 100 times as a very conservative
> > ratio to the US economy then they should be doing over a billion worth of
> > business in the states now.
> >
> > I just can't believe these inventors who have something good but just want
> > to milk
> > it for all they can get. If they believed in their product I would be
> happy
> > to pay a reasonable percentage of sales but they want millions up front.
> > Then they are surprised when companies are not interrested.
> >
> > I hope it is working somewhere and there are huge opertunities in the
> paper
> > industries and
> > heating industries for this product as one of the key advantages is that
> > there is NO Scaling.
> > In some paper manufacturing processes the heat exchangers work at an
> > average of about 50% efficiency and have to be dismantled for de-scaling
> > regularly.
> >
> > Just my experience
> >
> > Regards to all
> >
> > Chris Lautre
> >
> >
> >
> > > ----------
> > > From: DMBoss1021@aol.com[SMTP:DMBoss1021@aol.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 3:02 PM
> > > To: Interact@keelynet.com
> > > Subject: James Griggs: O/U heating device on the market?
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Found this article on alternative science web site:
> > >
> > > http://www.alternativescience.com/over-unity.htm
> > >
> > > It is titled: "Shock waves and steam heat"
> > > >>
> > > For more than two years debate has raged on the Internet about an
> > > ordinary-looking metal drum sitting on the concrete floor of a factory
> > > building in Rome, Georgia, 50 miles from Atlanta. Its inventor, the man
> > > about
> > > whom the Internet debate is raging, is James Griggs, an industrial
> heating
> > >
> > > engineer.
> > >
> > > The invention that has brought Griggs such notoriety is a device that he
> > > began developing in 1987, that he calls the 'Hydrosonic Pump' and that
> > > many
> > > of his supporters believe is over-unity, in that it generates around 30
> > > per
> > > cent more energy as heat than is put in as electricity.
> > > <<
> > >
> > > Apparently it works well enough that it has been installed in various
> > > local
> > > government buildings in or around his home town.
> > >
> > > >>
> > > In a second test, during which the over-unity effect was measured, the
> > > adjusted co-efficient of power was a remarkable 168 per cent -- the
> > > machine
> > > produced 1.68 times the energy that was input. A third test did nearly
> as
> > > well with a Co-efficient of power of 157 per cent.
> > >
> > > If the only evidence for these claims were the colour brochure printed
> by
> > > Griggs's company, Hydro Dynamics Corporation Inc., and reports of his
> > > supporters, then most observers might be inclined to side with the
> > > skeptics:
> > > Griggs's claims seem fundamentally improbable. Yet surprisingly, Griggs
> > > has
> > > not only patented his device and started manufacturing a commercial
> > > version
> > > on a small scale, he has also sold and installed devices to users in the
> > > Atlanta area.
> > >
> > > The customers include the Atlanta Police Department, a fire station, a
> dry
> > >
> > > cleaning plant, and a gymnasium. Interestingly, the Hydrosonic pump was
> > > installed in the public buildings by the county engineer after
> evaluating
> > > the
> > > device. The buildings are using the device mainly for heating purposes,
> > > and
> > > they have been running for more than a year. The customers have bills
> from
> > >
> > > their local electric utility company showing a year on year decrease in
> > > bills
> > > equivalent to 30 per cent.
> > > <<
> > >
> > > Anyone seen any other info on this device/process?
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > DMBoss1021
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> > > with the body text: leave Interact
> > > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > > http://keelynet.com/interact/
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> > with the body text: leave Interact
> > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > http://keelynet.com/interact/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------