------=_NextPart_000_0033_01BF3023.581AC040
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't remember who said it but it goes like that the Universe itself =
is an ultimate free lunch. After all, we never create energy, we just =
re-route it for our convenience. It's just a matter of discovering a new =
method of re-routing the one that already exists and pervades around us. =
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Ardvark <ardvark@easynet.co.uk>
To: Interact@Keelynet.com <Interact@Keelynet.com>
Date: Monday, November 15, 1999 2:43 PM
Subject: does anyone have a new Idea?
=20
=20
I am a little eccentric when it comes down to the problem of new =
energy sources for the next millennium, but not to the point where I'll =
go over and over the same old ground that thousands have trod before =
without success. I will admit I have tried some hare-brained ideas in my =
time, but that was before I knew the rules to this game, i.e.: there is =
no such thing as a free lunch. With that in mind, when you remove the =
impossible whatever is left is what you are looking for. There are many =
people trying to convince us that they have "solved the problem", "got a =
working model", I know, I used to do that myself before I started to =
take this subject seriously. Quite frankly, if any of their claims were =
true then we'd be applying that technology to our every day lives. But =
instead we keep hearing the same old excuses, "I am trying to get =
funding", "I am in the process of patenting my device", "I am looking =
for a manufacturer to put my device in to production". We all know they =
are just words and we've heard them all a thousand times.
So, what is the point of this tyrade? I have some Ideas, but I am =
not a physicist, I have a basic understanding of physics but no formal =
education. What I propose to do is to throw my Ideas in to the think =
tank without the paranoia that usually acompanies such an action, let =
the members of Keelynet mull them over and then report why they will or =
wont work. Sound good, too simple to work? I would encourage anyone else =
who has an idea to do the same and I don't mean all of the tired old =
discussions that have been floating around here for years with little or =
no results.
I will post my first Idea tommorow, with pictures if attachments =
are permitted, if not then I wll find another way.
thanks for your indulgence,
Ardvark.
ardvark@easynet.co.uk
------=_NextPart_000_0033_01BF3023.581AC040
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
-----Original =Message-----
From:=20 Ardvark <ardvark@easynet.co.uk>
To:=20 Interact@Keelynet.com <Interact@Keelynet.com>
Date:=20 Monday, November 15, 1999 2:43 PM
Subject: does anyone =have a=20 new Idea?I am a little eccentric when =it comes=20 down to the problem of new energy sources for the next millennium, =but not=20 to the point where I'll go over and over the same old ground that =thousands=20 have trod before without success. I will admit I have tried some=20 hare-brained ideas in my time, but that was before I knew the rules =to this=20 game, i.e.: there is no such thing as a free lunch. With that in =mind, when=20 you remove the impossible whatever is left is what you are looking =for.=20 There are many people trying to convince us that they have ="solved the=20 problem", "got a working model", I know, I used to do =that=20 myself before I started to take this subject seriously. Quite =frankly,=20 if any of their claims were true then we'd be applying that =technology to=20 our every day lives. But instead we keep hearing the same old =excuses,=20 "I am trying to get funding", "I am in the process of = patenting my device", "I am looking for a manufacturer to =put my=20 device in to production". We all know they are just words and =we've=20 heard them all a thousand times.So, what is the point of this =tyrade? I=20 have some Ideas, but I am not a physicist, I have a basic =understanding of=20 physics but no formal education. What I propose to do is to throw my =Ideas=20 in to the think tank without the paranoia that usually acompanies =such an=20 action, let the members of Keelynet mull them over and then report =why they=20 will or wont work. Sound good, too simple to work? I would encourage =anyone=20 else who has an idea to do the same and I don't mean all of the =tired old=20 discussions that have been floating around here for years with =little or no=20 results.I will post my first Idea =tommorow, with=20 pictures if attachments are permitted, if not then I wll find =another=20 way.&nbs=p;=20 thanks for your indulgence,&nbs=p;  =; = =20 Ardvark.ardvark@easynet.co.uk------=_NextPart_000_0033_01BF3023.581AC040-- ------------------------------------------------------------- To leave this list, emailwith the body text: leave Interact list archives and on line subscription forms are at http://keelynet.com/interact/ -------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Euejin Jeong: "Re: H2O fuel"
- Next message: Bill Seiple: "Re: Ocean water as propulsion"
- Maybe in reply to: Ardvark: "does anyone have a new Idea?"