does anyone have a new Idea?

Ardvark ( (no email) )
Mon, 15 Nov 1999 22:40:32 -0000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_001E_01BF2FBA.6CE17280
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am a little eccentric when it comes down to the problem of new =
energy sources for the next millennium, but not to the point where I'll =
go over and over the same old ground that thousands have trod before =
without success. I will admit I have tried some hare-brained ideas in my =
time, but that was before I knew the rules to this game, i.e.: there is =
no such thing as a free lunch. With that in mind, when you remove the =
impossible whatever is left is what you are looking for. There are many =
people trying to convince us that they have "solved the problem", "got a =
working model", I know, I used to do that myself before I started to =
take this subject seriously. Quite frankly, if any of their claims were =
true then we'd be applying that technology to our every day lives. But =
instead we keep hearing the same old excuses, "I am trying to get =
funding", "I am in the process of patenting my device", "I am looking =
for a manufacturer to put my device in to production". We all know they =
are just words and we've heard them all a thousand times.
So, what is the point of this tyrade? I have some Ideas, but I am not a =
physicist, I have a basic understanding of physics but no formal =
education. What I propose to do is to throw my Ideas in to the think =
tank without the paranoia that usually acompanies such an action, let =
the members of Keelynet mull them over and then report why they will or =
wont work. Sound good, too simple to work? I would encourage anyone else =
who has an idea to do the same and I don't mean all of the tired old =
discussions that have been floating around here for years with little or =
no results.
I will post my first Idea tommorow, with pictures if attachments are =
permitted, if not then I wll find another way.
thanks for your indulgence,
Ardvark.
ardvark@easynet.co.uk

------=_NextPart_000_001E_01BF2FBA.6CE17280
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

  I am a little eccentric when it =comes down=20to the problem of new energy sources for the next millennium, but not to =the=20point where I'll go over and over the same old ground that thousands =have trod=20before without success. I will admit I have tried some hare-brained =ideas in my=20time, but that was before I knew the rules to this game, i.e.: there is =no such=20thing as a free lunch. With that in mind, when you remove the impossible =whatever is left is what you are looking for. There are many people =trying to=20convince us that they have "solved the problem", "got a working model", =I know,=20I used to do that myself before I started to take this subject =seriously.=20Quite frankly, if any of their claims were true then we'd be applying =that=20technology to our every day lives. But instead we keep hearing the same =old=20excuses, "I am trying to get funding", "I am in the process of patenting =my=20device", "I am looking for a manufacturer to put my device in to =production". We=20all know they are just words and we've heard them all a thousand=20times.
 So, what is the point of this =tyrade? I have=20some Ideas, but I am not a physicist, I have a basic understanding of =physics=20but no formal education. What I propose to do is to throw my Ideas in to =the=20think tank without the paranoia that usually acompanies such an action, =let the=20members of Keelynet mull them over and then report why they will or wont =work.=20Sound good, too simple to work? I would encourage anyone else who has an =idea to=20do the same and I don't mean all of the tired old discussions that have =been=20floating around here for years with little or no results.
  I will post my first Idea =tommorow, with=20pictures if attachments are permitted, if not then I wll find another=20way.
          &nbs=p; thanks=20for your indulgence,
          &nbs=p;            =;            =       =20Ardvark.
ardvark@easynet.co.uk
 
------=_NextPart_000_001E_01BF2FBA.6CE17280-- ------------------------------------------------------------- To leave this list, email with the body text: leave Interact list archives and on line subscription forms are at http://keelynet.com/interact/ -------------------------------------------------------------