Re: Thought experiment
Dave Nelson ( (no email) )
Thu, 28 Oct 1999 12:42:45 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0022_01BF2141.EEB5B5A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Some interesting thoughts on the matter. All seem to indicate it may be =
kind of dangerous to be around. It came to me that in addition to what =
has been posted, that theoretically, if the atomic material of those =
spheres themselves lost their gravitational properties, I wouldn't be =
surprised if they just passed through anything they encountered. Like =
spirits. Actually, they might just cease to exist altogether in a flash =
of light. That is one reason I am looking at alternative ways of =
accomplishing antigravity, keeping the sphere as an object within our =
physcial realm. Like keeping it in an envelope. Not much benefit to us =
if it just disappears.
So how could we put a "bubble" around these objects and move them at =
will?=20
Dave Nelson
------=_NextPart_000_0022_01BF2141.EEB5B5A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
Some interesting thoughts on the matter. All seem to indicate =it may=20be kind of dangerous to be around. It came to me that in addition =to what=20has been posted, that theoretically, if the atomic material of those =spheres=20themselves lost their gravitational properties, I wouldn't be =surprised if=20they just passed through anything they encountered. Like =spirits. =20Actually, they might just cease to exist altogether in a flash of =light. =20That is one reason I am looking at alternative ways of =accomplishing=20antigravity, keeping the sphere as an object within our physcial =realm. =20Like keeping it in an envelope. Not much benefit to us if it =just=20disappears.
So how could we put a "bubble" around these objects and move them =at=20will?
Dave Nelson