With all due respect to you, I do not think that I deserve to be reduced to one
person. I have no problem to stand behind what I say. May be I should have said
that I preffer one personal experiment or observation to hundred URL's.
I did quite a bit on transverse water waves, and my refference to the behaviour of
ocean waves comming to the coast is as relevant as anything. As soon as you
dissregard the concept of relativity regards wave of light, and look at it from
the point of view of QM, it makes sense to treat EM strength as multitude and the
wave as the transverse property of photon. As biased as it may be, it lead me to a
very simple principle, which looks way better than anything out there.
And please remember that I said, as biased as it may be.
Regards Slavek.
Jerry W. Decker wrote:
> Hi Ren et al!
Snip
-----------------------
> There is no way around it, however, it appears everyone has their own
> interpretation of even these basic realities of the universe.
>
> I always try to include URLs to backup why I say what I say, yet I don't
> see that happening when something is refuted.
>
> Wonder why that is?
>
> One person said he didn't 'trust URLs'....well good point, but there are
> many universities and technical sites so its a matter of discrimination
> and looking for cross correlation with other sites that backup the
> meaning of the questionable topic.
>
> It does take time to locate that backup information, sometimes a great
> deal of time, sometimes I have found information that corrected my
> view. I've spent hours digging out URLs that backup a point for just
> one message.
>
> What I find interesting is this lack of backup for statements made,
> relying on off the cuff or top of the head comments or casual remarks,
> where something is said relating to just basic physics that is well
> established, yet apparently misunderstood or 'interpreted'.
>
> Perhaps that is an indication of WHY there is no tangible advances in
> alt science because we aren't all playing from the same understandings
> about how the universe works. I don't claim to KNOW everything there is
> to know about physics or science or anything, and am certainly open to
> change if someone will take the time to PROVE to me that I am in error.
> I think any rational person is like that, willing to optimize and adapt
> to the reality, not the interpretation of that reality.
Snip
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------