Gravitys Equal Pull

Brian Feeney ( (no email) )
Wed, 01 Sep 1999 17:18:01 -0400

Warren wrote:

>The Pull: The Pull force is the two parallel TIME Flow (Lines or center
>of the tunnels) trying to return to one line or ZPEL. It is the Weak
>force or what we know as Gravity.

Hello Warren,

In light of the above description of gravity, how do two bodies or electrons
attract toward one another. The pull gravity you are describing seems to be
a closed loop inside or coinsident with the electron. If two electrons are
in some proximaty to one another (I don't beleive distance is a governing
factor) and the gravity mechanism is the two parallel TIME Flow lines as
descibed above seeking to close the gap inside the electron, hense gravity,
what is the interaction mechanism that causes the second electron (or body
mass) to move toward the first electron.

I'm trying to separate in this question the electrons coalessing to form an
atom vs the fundamental and "universal" gravitational attaction that is
apparant in all things material.

I should say that I do find your theory of the photon / electron etc. quite
interesting. I do appreciate it is a work in process and add my thanks for
your continued postings. I enjoyed reading your 1994? paper. I'm wondering
if ultimately what you are driving toward is is GUT description of A SINGLE
PHOTON as being the sum of all that is. I've thought about this a great deal
and a SINGLE PHOTON would explain a lot about how "forces" act over distance
i.e. there is no real distance to your neighbour or the furthest galaxies.
The SINGLE PHOTON continuously recreates itself in an eternal moment i.e. no
real past or future. I'm probably sounding a little philosphical here and
probably going beyond your work on the electron / photon relationship. I
can't however seem to get this description of "all that is' out of my head.
Maybe you could outline a brief description of some of your ideas on what
the relationship between the photon and space time are. Any comments on the
single photon idea and your ideas on 'all that is' much appreciated.

Thank you for your remarks.

Cheers
Brian