James Chadwick (1891-1974)a student of Rutherford around 1930 "invented"
the neutrino. The reason was that A -> B + electron seemed to violate
the law of conservation of energy. "A is the radioactive atom before
decay;
B is the atom after decay. The electron can have energies that vary from
almost zero up to some maximum value. The total energy of A including
its rest-mass energy must be equal to the total energy of B plus the
total energy of the electron." This did not happen so he "invented" the
neutrino to explain why the energy did not add up. In 1933 Enrico
Fermi wrote A -> B + electron + neutrino. Twenty-Five years later
the neutrino was detected directly. So the neutrino is also known as
Enrico Fermi. As a side note in addition in 1920 Rutherford after only
a few days of strenuous work proved that an electron + proton = neutron.
"From Quarks to the Cosmos" Tools of Discovery by Leon M. Lederman and
David N. Schramm, page 58. ISBN:0-7167-6012-6
Now correct me if I am wrong but is the question: Is the neutrino the
possible shadow of the electron? See
http://personal.bellsouth.net/lig/i/n/infonet/Spin.htm
What connection does the neutrino and the electron have in common?
Nobody knows yet other than what was just stated is that correct?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy wrote:
>
> The photons create the wormholes in the electron so the electron is in
> constant shift of photon interation. I figured that from your other
> statements, but do the exiting photons leave the electron before entering the
> next wormhole. If so they could leave long in enough to attemp a secondary
> spin of 1/2 which would get more intense until the electron nolonger function
> in thus moves to the secondary spin which then again creats another secondary
> 1/2 spin and so on. That's what I meant by does photons go through the
> wormhole?
=======================================================================
Warren writes:
Now this is what I have found. It does not mean your view is incorrect
however. I am basing my view on the action of the photon. What seems to
give the photon its duality properties is due to its action or method of
motion. (osculation)
[os·cu·la·tion n. 1.a. The act of kissing. b. A kiss.
2. Mathematics. A contact, as between two curves or surfaces, at three
or more common points. --os“cu·la·to”ry adj.]
It is moving in both the X (Time/Space field or T)
and the Y axis (Space/Time Field or E direction of motion of
energy-photon) The Z axis (Time as we know it) is folded in on the Y
axis
here. The axis of reference in this case is the Y axis is the tunnel and
the X is the body of the photon as you have drawn it in the AVI. The Y
axis is also in rotation along the X axis plain. The X axis is in
rotation
along the Y axis plane giving you a donut or the topology of a torus.
This view is orthogonally to the symmetry axis. This torus shape having
a spherical "outer" shape with a "hole" along the symmetry axis Y. If
the radius of the starting point was exactly zero, the outer shape
would be sperical and the hole would take up zero volume. The Photon.
Now, the photon when it blends with the other 458 photons in the forming
tunnel to reach its paired limit of 459 paired with the other counter
action 459 photons (captured) does not exit the now formed electron
(as to theory) but is like a marble coming out of the well along its
rim. This is the first stages of Gravity forming out of the process. It
now spreads across the surface until it finds the other opening in the
second 459 photon time tunnel. This would also means there are some
photons in transit between tunnels. This might account for the .11 or
..12 difference I have found. Now when light (photons) are pumped into
the electron they will enter this process over the limit of 918 paired
and force the electron to become larger (taking on energy) as you show
the photon doing in the AVI but this happy point as I call it or quanta
level wants to return to it's 918 balance point and will give up the
photons to reach it. This is known as lasing or stimulated emission.
Now by theory if you accelerate the electron you should also be able
to change Space/Time through it. This will not change the speed of light
but only the distance of the speed of light to our TIME frame. There are
other ways to also do this. Now in your AVI of the photon the spread
should be along the Y axis and not the X axis as you show. I will stop
here for now.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy wrote:
>
> I'm starting to beleive that dimensions may come in units. Such as ours is
> four dimension (with time as the fourth). But when it comes up 8 dimension,
> one is between worlds of another unit dimension of four dimensions or in a
> sense another world of four dimensions.
========================================================================
Warren writes:
If you are trying to say that Time and Space can be pumped, Yes. This
would lead to a Pulse Time Drive. One that rides the edge of TIME
without
making a complete jump. The effects will be propulsion using Space/Time.
I have a video of an object doing just this effect. I call it riding the
TIME Line. Seems somebody already has this technology and I don't think
they are little gray men.
Warren