Hi Steve!
What is IDSA?
You ask what is the 'Quantum Level' and beyond? Yes to some degree it is
relative. But, science clearly shows us that we make progress only to the
degree that we can perceive and then define relative differences. Further
that there must be internal consistancy and symmetries in our conception of
the universe fore we find these in the Universe itself.
The relativeness that you speak of only makes sense until you go a little
deeper and choose an arbitrary point and then define a standardized meaning
that all can agree to, such as 32 degrees Fahrenheint = the freezing point
of water. Failure to define a point mutually and in a consenus fashion
leaves no reason to continue a discussion.
If you happen to choose an arbitrary point that matches some inherent
characteristic or property of matter as we know it, such as "absolute zero",
then there is an inherent meaning that should be obvious and is not really
all that relative; you either accept it or you don't.
As I understand it and I believe is generally agreed, 'quantum level' refers
to sub-atomic particles smaller than standard protons, neutrons, and
electrons that compose atoms - etc. This arbitrary point of relative size
seems to be a singularity point that has different properties as one looks to
larger macroscopic sizes, as seen in Newtonian Physics, and to smaller
particles demonstrating the wierd world of 'quantum level' effects.
I see and define particles as a quantitized standing wave packets of highly
dense energy each possessing unique internal geometries, each particle is
itself a singularity possessing unique characteristics and properties both
individually and in combination. These particles then form a continuum
based on ultimately total energy that extends potentially above and below our
current range of perception. The point I personally stress is that particles
are ultimately wave in nature at the lowest most basic level.
You suggest that there is no such thing as a 'single' point of unity,
'dimension'. No, but, there are points of convergence, or points where
'State Changes' in matter , energy and geometry take place. These places
give us very highly defined places to observe and operate from.
Dimensionality appears to be stable states that which are within or beyond
our current range of perception/consciousness.
I'm surprised that 'quantum level' is your bone of contention!? The
implications of the 'Magnetic Bubble' appear far more curious to me
personally.
R.E. Cathey