TIME Form Postulates
Warren E. York ( (no email) )
Thu, 5 Aug 1999 13:53:01 -0500
On Thu, 05 Aug 1999 14:39:06 Ted Gallop <gallope@planet.curtin.edu.au>
writes:
>Hi,
>I was very interested in the discussion/description of the various
>forms of time that you postulate. One 'form' that seems ro be missing,
and that
>I would have thought was almost a key to the other forms would be
>"relative time". My $0.02 worth is that it is the basis of the
relationship
>between the forms of time that 'sets the scene' for, or even creates,
our
>experiential existence.
>
>Ted Gallop
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~
>Ted Gallop
>Information Manager
>Policy and Planning Office
>Curtin University of Technology
>Phone: +61 8 9266 2246 Fax: +61 8 9266 2109
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~
Thank you Ted:
Yes, you are correct and I will add this to the list now. This is exactly
why I have posted such a list.
It is not what only I may have to say but what others (you all out there)
may be able to contribute. This
is a free area of research and everybody that wishes can contribute. I
will make note by the entry so
credit is given as this develops. Who knows, you might just be the next
person to go down in our
kids science books as contributing to the development of TIME Travel or
Warp Drive devices. Getting
started seems to be the problem and that is only what I am trying to
enunciate a list of TIME postulates with this discussion group through
the help of Keelynet and her subscribers that are interested. Remember as
Ted has just pointed out. This list is not complete by any means and may
have many additional entries as we progress. Thank you Ted and the rest
of you all for your interest. Betterment for all of mankind based on
maturity and not greed. Lets shoot for the Stars. Your input is always
welcome.
I will start a break down of definitions at random to the list unless a
specific request is given. One
per week so ample time is allowed for responce and corrections made if
found. This is the only
unfair part of the process. I will have final determination as to the
most correct definition due to research knowledge not available to the
public as to date. I will be fair and explain reasons to my findings if a
conflict should arise within the definition. All will be subject to
change as our knowledge grows. The idea is to refine or fine tune the
words used in the definition as to use the most appropriate and accurate
form. Remember the final outcome may be used by others in the future. I
also feel this will give us a deeper understanding of the process and
properties of TIME itself. Consider #5 "Composite TIME" the first posted
definition. I will post both List of Postulates and Definition by #
separate so as to not overload any one posting. Make note that the mailer
may put listing on a single line due to its method of saving space.
Please indicate if you wish to remain acrimonious on the list in credits
as by
name and or association. Warren
Think Tank Base
infonet@home.com
warren.york@juno.com
ICQ#: 39329500
=========================================================================
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.