Re: On Cold Fusion & Stimulated Superconductor 'Levitation'

NeXuS ( (no email) )
Sat, 10 Oct 1998 13:08:52 +1000

Isnt yttrium barium oxide the superconductor used the gravity reduction
experiments just wondering that is all.
----------
> From: Dennis C. Lee <atech@ix.netcom.com>
> To: NeXuS <nexus@tig.com.au> Jerry Wayne Decker <jwdatwork@yahoo.com>
KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net
> Cc: chenders@keelynet.com; vortex-L@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: On Cold Fusion & Stimulated Superconductor 'Levitation'
> Date: Saturday, October 10, 1998 1:17 PM
>
>
> Gravity:
> I thought gravity was a 10^12 Hz. radiation? Is this frequency somehow
> shielded by the magnetic field or diamagnetic/superconducting material?
Or
> could ether particles (Joseph Cater's soft electrons) be shielded from
> interacting with mass to produce this 10^12 Hz frequency?
>
> Cold fusion:
> I subscribe to David Hudson's superconducting theory that Yttrium Barium
> Copper Oxide is really a Yttrium Barium Oxide lattice with monatomic
copper
> held in the lattice compartments. The spacing is such that the monatomic
> copper is held coincident to the quantum wave thus synchronizing the
copper
> atoms coherently. Thus, could cold fusion be a similar phenomenon with a
> Palladium lattice holding monatomic hydrogen coincident to a quantum
wave?
>
> I would use cold fusion techniques if it could be customized to produce
O/U
> hydrogen/oxygen fuels (directly from the electrodes) to power existing
> internal combustion engines.
>
> Dennis
>
> At 12:10 PM 10/10/98 +1000, NeXuS wrote:
> >
> >Question Just wondering if they did this experiment again with mganetic
> >shielding so as to rule it out anyone ?
> >
> >> --- On Podletnekov Stimulated Superconductor Levitation
> >>
> >> Consider this, we have a piece of superconducting material, either
> >> rotating or stimulated by a surrounding coil.
> >>
> >> Any mass placed ABOVE this material appears to lose approximately 3%
> >> to 5% of its weight.
> >>
> >> Any object placed BELOW this material does NOT experience a weight
> >> loss.
> >>
> >> I asked John Schnurer if he'd tested this and he said YES, there is NO
> >> weight loss under such material.
> >>
> >> Now, what is below the material that is not above the material?
> >>
> >> Perhaps the magnetic field of the earth, undistorted by the stimulated
> >> superconductor?
> >>
> >> This would make the effect purely diamagnetic because it is repelling
> >> against the earths magnetic field.
> >>
> >> Therefore, again in my opinion, there is no true gravity effect.
> >>
> >> We must take into consideration the flying frogs which were living
> >> beings, all done with incredibly dense magnetic fields, but repellent
> >> (diamagnetic) nonetheless.
> >>
> >> Just my observations for the record.
>
>
> Tall Ships
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~atech/tallship.html