Cold fusion:
I subscribe to David Hudson's superconducting theory that Yttrium Barium
Copper Oxide is really a Yttrium Barium Oxide lattice with monatomic copper
held in the lattice compartments. The spacing is such that the monatomic
copper is held coincident to the quantum wave thus synchronizing the copper
atoms coherently. Thus, could cold fusion be a similar phenomenon with a
Palladium lattice holding monatomic hydrogen coincident to a quantum wave?
I would use cold fusion techniques if it could be customized to produce O/U
hydrogen/oxygen fuels (directly from the electrodes) to power existing
internal combustion engines.
Dennis
At 12:10 PM 10/10/98 +1000, NeXuS wrote:
>
>Question Just wondering if they did this experiment again with mganetic
>shielding so as to rule it out anyone ?
>
>> --- On Podletnekov Stimulated Superconductor Levitation
>>
>> Consider this, we have a piece of superconducting material, either
>> rotating or stimulated by a surrounding coil.
>>
>> Any mass placed ABOVE this material appears to lose approximately 3%
>> to 5% of its weight.
>>
>> Any object placed BELOW this material does NOT experience a weight
>> loss.
>>
>> I asked John Schnurer if he'd tested this and he said YES, there is NO
>> weight loss under such material.
>>
>> Now, what is below the material that is not above the material?
>>
>> Perhaps the magnetic field of the earth, undistorted by the stimulated
>> superconductor?
>>
>> This would make the effect purely diamagnetic because it is repelling
>> against the earths magnetic field.
>>
>> Therefore, again in my opinion, there is no true gravity effect.
>>
>> We must take into consideration the flying frogs which were living
>> beings, all done with incredibly dense magnetic fields, but repellent
>> (diamagnetic) nonetheless.
>>
>> Just my observations for the record.
Tall Ships
http://pw1.netcom.com/~atech/tallship.html