Re: Power source/Searle story

Bill McMurtry ( weber@powerup.com.au )
Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:09:08 +1000

Hi Dennis,

At 13:59 21/09/98 -0700, Dennis C. Lee wrote:
>
>Could these people have been threatened? If threats were made, and Searl's
>technology checked out, would you tell everyone who called asking about it?
>Now that Fergie's mother has died in a car crash, there may be reason to
>question the ethics of happenings in England.

So, you think Searl has nobody to back his claims because EVERYONE has been
threatened? Spare me the conspiracy theories Dennis. Too easy and totally
irrelevant!

>He has probably tried that approach. Searl is an example of society
>suppressing its' inventors for doing too good a job. Searl's behavior is the
>result of his having to do too much of the R&D without mainstream support
>for too long a time. We should all shed tears for what has happened to
>Professor Searl (we're probably next). :(

Searl's behavior could be the result of a lot of things <g>. Once again,
where is the evidence for all this R&D effort? Anything? While Searl
continues to hide behind a veil of smoke and mirrors, he deserves ZERO
respect, let alone tears.

>Next time, offer Professor Searl 1500 pounds for a look at the magnet
>(market rate admission price for state of the art previews in the
>semiconductor industry I believe).

What evidence do you have that Searl actually ever created a single working
device? Have you spent 1500 pounds for a private preview of Searl's proof
of principal? If not, then maybe it's not just 1500 pounds, maybe it's a
trillion pounds so that nobody can afford it and he gets to keep playing
'the game' - Come on!

>God willing and humanity being worthy,
>Professor Searl will find his properly respected place as being at least an
>equal to Tesla's level of technical genius. :)

You know, there's a huge difference between Tesla's and Searl's
achievements - Tesla demonstrated over and over the creation of practical
devices. Searl just talks about it, over and over. (somewhat inconsistantly
over time, I might add). Should he actually produce some physical
demonstration to back up the hot air, then perhaps I could start comparing
him to other great achievers. Until then... what do you think?

As for us unworthy, unwashed, ungrateful peoples of the world - give me a
break, heard it all before... utter crap! Professor of what? Ever asked
Searl how he obtained his professorship and from where and for what (nicely
of course)? You may be one of the faithful blind followers - not me baby,
it takes more than an endlessly meandering hot air ballon ride to turn me
on these days <g>. I invite you to substantiate your support for Searl with
something more than idol worship. I assume it takes more than a tall story
to gain your support?

With evidence, belief becomes irrelevant.

Regards, Bill.

P.S. Just thought I'd mention it before you propose it: I've not been paid
off nor am I a government agent, CIA, alien cross-breed, God knows what
else, Searl hater.

I just can not see the sense in allowing the unsubstantiated claims of
Searl (or anybody else for that matter) to continue waisting productive
lives in a mindless, fruitless search while real progress will be made
elsewhere. I think it should be said. How much money and effort and time
has been invested already by the 'unworthy' people of the world FOLLOWING
Searl's claims, with nothing to show for it? EVIDENCE BRINGS RESPECT. IMO,
Searl should prove his case or... but he can't, can he. You know Dennis,
this about sums it up - Searl will be remembered as one of the greatest
frauds of the latter half of the 20th Century. IMCO, of course.