Re: Power source/Searle story

Dennis C. Lee ( (no email) )
Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:59:54 -0700

At 02:13 PM 9/22/98 +1000, you wrote:
>Hi JC,
>
>I know a guy out here in Australia who did a real job on Searle. His
>research ended with a visit to England to discuss matters with Searle
>personally. To cut a long story short, this aquaintance could find
>absolutely no evidence to back Searles claims. When given references by
>Searle (various academics at a university) he was told by all of them that
>they either did'nt know the man or that they thought his 'theories' were
>rubbish. One reference given was a professional who Searle claimed was
>involved in some aspect of the complex magnet fabrication process, when
>followed up this reference thought it was all a joke! Anyway, Searle was
>presented with all this and his response was 'tears and emotional
>withdrawal'. Another research project ended.

Could these people have been threatened? If threats were made, and Searl's
technology checked out, would you tell everyone who called asking about it?
Now that Fergie's mother has died in a car crash, there may be reason to
question the ethics of happenings in England.

>Personally, I just can't understand how Searle can generate such a huge
>following. There is zero evidence to support his claims and the evidence
>provided (photo's etc.) are fabricated publicity material of 'what could be'.
>
>A few years ago I spoke with Searle myself. From the statements and stories
>floating around, it appears Searle claimed he had a small demonstration
>magnet set some time ago that illustrated the fundimental concept of his
>revolving magnets. I asked him about this and remarked that if he could
>produce such a cheap demonstration of his principals then perhaps he'd have
>more luck finding the million dollars or so that he was trying to raise at
>the time. He smiled at me and walked away.

He has probably tried that approach. Searl is an example of society
suppressing its' inventors for doing too good a job. Searl's behavior is the
result of his having to do too much of the R&D without mainstream support
for too long a time. We should all shed tears for what has happened to
Professor Searl (we're probably next). :(

Next time, offer Professor Searl 1500 pounds for a look at the magnet
(market rate admission price for state of the art previews in the
semiconductor industry I believe). God willing and humanity being worthy,
Professor Searl will find his properly respected place as being at least an
equal to Tesla's level of technical genius. :)

Dennis
Tall Ships
http://pw1.netcom.com/~atech/tallship.html