You wrote:
>Wanna bet? 1500 pounds each for Professor Searl's preview tickets. Loser
>pays all expenses. If more than a few want to come along, I'll just accept
>1500 pounds each. Professor Searl would then get the other 1500 pounds each.
>That's 1500 British pounds sterling of course.
>Be forewarned that I am capable of defending myself and Professor Searl, so
>there will be no funny business whatsoever. If necessary, my life says so.
>Dennis
That's what it's all really about, is'nt it Dennis - MONEY! What makes you
think that after decades of pussy footing around suddenly Searl is going to
prove his case, with hardware, to anyone? Do you of know any objective
person (i.e. not a Searl 'cultist') who has been provided with a proof of
principal demonstration? I'd love to talk with them if you do... Did'nt
think so. If Searl could prove his case, he would have do so by now.
Have you got anything that even remotely comes close to good evidence to
support Searl's claims? Why are you so keen on this guy? What's your
interest in the Searl industry? What have you been promised? Is money your
only interest?
O.K. Dennis, you're on. I've been searching for a F/E solution now for
longer than I can remember (well, not quite) so 3000 pounds plus expenses,
IF I lose, seems a small price to pay for absolute proof of Searl's claims.
Let me make it clear that I will happily part with the cash and you will
not need to defend either yourself or Searl with your life <g>. As I have
told Searl, if he can supply the proof then I, and a lot of others I
expect, would be his friends for life.
Conditions: Can the the talk, forget the spooky math (heard it all before),
the preview ticket will be for a WORKING DEMONSTRATION OF SEARL'S PROOF OF
PRINCIPAL. Make no mistake, if Searl can not show me a WORKING piece of
hardware, open for inspection (no tricks), that demonstrates his claims,
then you lose and you pick up the tab. The demonstration should take place
at a mutually agreed venue and at a convenient time for all parties. A
binding agreement should be drawn up. The anti should be held in trust by a
mutually agreed third party. Furthermore, the results of this excursion
should be publically posted for all to view (with exception of any agreed
propriety technical information). Any conditions from your end? I'm
confident, how about you?
Without wanting to sound like a total cynical bastard, this is what I
expect: Searl will never be ready for this demonstration, always due to
technical problems of one form or another. The price will increase. I will
not be deemed 'worthy'. He will not agree to a demonstration outside his
own property boundary. IMO, he simply will not respond to the threat of
ending his God aweful game.
The ball's in your court Dennis.
Regards, Bill.