Don J. S, Adams - wrote:
> Norman,
>
> What can I say...but WOW! What amazing information! Thanks for sendin=
g that...
> this goes in my MUST HAVE /MUST SAVE folder! I don't feel like such a =
freakin
> dough brain now.... at least other people more qualified than myself ha=
ve found this
> equation and surrounding phenomenon of profound interest. So maybe I'm=
not stupid
> or crackers? ;>
>
> ITs gonna take some time for me to digest much of the importance behind=
much of this
> I suspect...but at least I have a whole lot more to go on than I did be=
fore...
> I wonder... could this equation be some sort of 'seal' or 'mark' on tim=
e space
> indicating some sort of vibratory origin point? OR does that just soun=
d like so much
> hooey?
>
> Norm I extracted a paragraph from the article you sent and wanted to as=
k you some questions
> about it...
>
> >Roger has studied Magic Squares, and is familiar with Keely's =
3:9:81
> >series. Roger has also discovered that old Scottish Clan Tart=
ans are
> >woven in the Magic Square ratios. He has a Windows program th=
at will
> >generate Tartan/Magic Square patterns. My thought: A Tartan w=
oven of
> >conductive wire might exhibit some interesting effects.
>
> is this software program available? Also you mention weaving conductiv=
e wires
> into Tartan... you mean into the woolen fabrics? What sort of interest=
ing effects
> are you thinking of..? HEY WAIT A MINUTE! GREAT ZOIKS!!!! WIRE, WOOL=
, WEAVING...?
> You're thinking of some sort of peculiar ORGONE ACCUMULATOR??!!! Aren'=
t you? Wow...
> with a magic square type configuration to it!!?? WHAT WOULD THAT DO!!=
!! TELL ME
> NORM!!! PLEASEEEE!!!! I gotta know, hey I'm Scottish and I'm really up=
on my Celtic
> history, legend etc... I have to know whats goin on here? What the he=
ck were my ancestors
> up to anyway? I always thought there was something eldritch about tart=
an and celtic
> art patterns (very fractal in nature)...like they were trying to tell m=
e something ....
> uh oh...the hair on the back of my neck just started to stand up...ok N=
ORM what
> can o' worms have we opened here?
> Grin...
>
> Norman Wootan wrote:
> >
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> >
> > Message 8538 DATE/TIME: 09/21/94 09=
:22
> > >From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
> > To : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
> > Subject: Letter from Sweden
> > Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
> >
> > Received a most interesting letter from Roger Natanaelsson in Sweden.
> > He ends with, "Since I can't get the answers from Science I have to
> > find the answers myself." Amen, Roger.
> >
> > Several points made in the letter:
> >
> > The ALZ&RES file correlates zinc, calcium and aluminum, which Roger
> > says have the same lattice structure as copper, silver and gold, and
> > which I think should transmute in the same manner, since they are the
> > same relative "notes" on the Russell chart of increasing/decreasing
> > disintegration.
> >
> > Roger has studied Magic Squares, and is familiar with Keely's 3:9:81
> > series. Roger has also discovered that old Scottish Clan Tartans are
> > woven in the Magic Square ratios. He has a Windows program that will
> > generate Tartan/Magic Square patterns. My thought: A Tartan woven of
> > conductive wire might exhibit some interesting effects.
> >
> > Roger also points out that the three 'currents' of 3D Square in Magic
> > Squares are required in order to complete a 'stream' of force, ie,
> > using the 120Hz example, you have Atom freq. of 14400Hz and Etheric
> > freq. of 20736000Hz, but the AMPLITUDE PROPORTION should be equal
> > thirds of the stream. He believes that this is why the old vinyl LP
> > records were played at 33 1/3 RPM.
> >
> > As a side note, Roger says that my Clan motto is "Vincere Vec Mori",
> > which means "To Conquer the Carrier of Death". Apparently there were
> > some healers behind those Tartans. Roger says "Here is some feedback
> > hopefully building new paths." I couldn't agree more!
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> >
> > Message 8539 DATE/TIME: 09/21/94 09=
:40
> > >From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
> > To : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
> > Subject: "Roger's Ratio"
> > Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
> >
> > Just a note on the previous message. If you use Roger's example of
> > applying Magic Square ratios to the Magic Square proportion, in other
> > words 3D Square, you get a repeating base ten number system which
> > substitutes a decimal for the eighth, or repeating "note" on the
> > Russell scale.
> >
> > 33 1/3 times 33 1/3 =3D 1111.11111 times itself gives 1234567.901234.=
...
> > I don't know if I can fully grasp the significance of this, but it
> > seems to give a mathematical basis for relating Keely's work with
> > that of Russell.
> >
> > Base eight as the natural number system? That seems to be the
> > implication, based upon nature itself...of course, computers are base=
d
> > on this, but maybe much, much more.
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > Hi! Don: Hope mthis helps. Norm
> >
> > Norman Wootan wrote:
> >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
> > > Your following message has been delivered to the 161 members of
> > > the list KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net at 21:08:32 on 6 Sep 1998.
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
> > >
> > > Hi! Don: Joel McClain brought up this formula back in 1994 on the =
old Keelynet BBS
> > > message base. I'll look it up for you and post his entire message =
so others can get his original comments as
> > > to it's implications. Norm
> > >
> > > Don J. S, Adams - wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok, I'm not a brilliant mathematician but if the following does
> > > > not prove that there is a conscious intelligence behind time and
> > > > space and everything and that this isnt some grand cosmic joke
> > > > played out in a way that says 'yoo hoo, boneheads... I'm heeerrrr=
eee'
> > > > Then I don't know what would. I am a simple man, and I make many
> > > > errors. Both in judgement, rationale, logic and what I should
> > > > or should not have for supper tonight. But I cam across this equ=
ation
> > > > sometime ago...hidden away in a brief conversation archived on Ke=
elynet.
> > > > I think the fellow who had initially discovered or come across it
> > > > was an an engineer and if I recall correctly this equation really
> > > > spooked him. Another fellow who tried to follow up and explain
> > > > this, I felt did a wonderful job at explaing bits and pieces and
> > > > contributed small referential 'trivia' regarding transcendental
> > > > numbers and such.... but to be honest, to me this all fell flat
> > > > and paled in comparison to the growing numb feeling starting in t=
he
> > > > pit of my stomach and a muffled shout of 'WHAT THE HE**?" bouncin=
g
> > > > around my head. Frankly it occupied my thoughts, this equation..
> > > > for some time and I tried to wrap my head aropund it and figure o=
ut
> > > > why on earth it made me feel so (irrationally I might add) odd.
> > > > Like being on a roller coaster and knowing that any second the ri=
de
> > > > was about to begin and there was no way I could physically be abl=
e
> > > > to take it all in so I might as well just hold on for my life....
> > > >
> > > > Call me crazy but this equation appears to represent an intellige=
nt
> > > > finger print of an unknown element which appears must co-exist in=
a dual
> > > > state in and out of space-time. Please keep in mind that I fully=
expect
> > > > to have someone come back and tell me I'm off my rocker, that I'm=
ignorant,
> > > > haven't done my homework, haven't read enough about this topic an=
d frankly
> > > > should pack up my bags right now...go home and leave such thinkin=
g to
> > > > those who are much more qualified to pontificate and deliberate o=
n such
> > > > issues. And I'll do this quite gladly...just someone please give
> > > > me a reasonable explanation that makes sense fully... and makes t=
his odd
> > > > feeling go away. If some one comes back and quibbles a stock or =
ad hoc
> > > > 'text book' answere, likely I'll hush up for now but quietly insi=
de I'll
> > > > still be thinking, 'Great Zoiks'! This is IT!
> > > >
> > > > 111,111,111 * 111,111,111 =3D 12345678987654321
> > > >
> > > > notice the symmetry of the result. This equation could
> > > > very likely be called the 'mother of all fractals' the implicatio=
ns
> > > > are enormous and it seems almost no one knows about this?
> > > > I've seen one engineer just about sh** his pants when he saw this
> > > > ...because technically it 'shouldn't exist'? It could very likel=
y be
> > > > proof of an artificial construct / boundary or strange attractor'=
s existence
> > > > that was placed into the very fabric of time / space AND into man=
's
> > > > conscious ability to perceive it. The other extremely odd thing =
is that
> > > > this equation appears to exhibit multi-dimensional and 'out of ti=
me'
> > > > references and connections. No other numeric string that I know =
of
> > > > does this. One could perceive the quotient as a perfectly ascend=
ing
> > > > and descending sine wave. Close the wave and you would have a pe=
rfect
> > > > sphere or circle. No beginning or ending and yet an Alpha and Ome=
ga are
> > > > present at the same time. Eternity and the now, co-existing. Th=
e freaky
> > > > thing is that this equation appears to be hidden in multiple arti=
facts some
> > > > of which are thousands of years old. How could the ancients have=
effectively
> > > > computed such numbers and understood the profound implications st=
ored within?
> > > >
> > > > One simple example is the 'Star' of David.
> > > >
> > > > Bisect the star laterally. Note the top section composed of '3' s=
egments or '111'. Note
> > > > how each sub-segment (triangle) has 3 singularities or a collecti=
on of 3, 3's or 111,111,111.
> > > >
> > > > The bottom section has the same numeric values. Thus 111,111,111=
and 111,111,111
> > > > placed one above the other;
> > > >
> > > > 111,111,111
> > > > 111,111,111
> > > >
> > > > Now multiply to get eternity and the now. The moment and forever.=
I could go on and on
> > > > about this very strange equation... there appears to be connectio=
ns between this and magnetism
> > > > and other various aspects of physical reality. In magnetism we h=
ave the '3', North and South
> > > > Polar and the ZPE type equivalent or void, bloch wall dividing th=
e polarities.
> > > >
> > > > Also in various cultures and religions there is a representation =
of 'trinity' type segments in the
> > > > perception of the deity. Hindu's have 3 major gods who represent=
a singularity of ultimate
> > > > core consciousness. Each 'segment' representing different 'polar=
ities'.
> > > >
> > > > Where Noth polar represents contracting energy, South Polar expan=
ding energy and the Bloch
> > > > Wall - origin point ?
> > > >
> > > > Brahma creates (South Polar?), Vishnu preserves (North Polar), an=
d Shiva destroys or makes
> > > > Void (Bloch wall?).
> > > >
> > > > In Christianity you have three in one again, 111. God the Father=
(North Polar?) maintains reality, God the
> > > > Son (South Polar?) expands between God and man, and the Holy Spir=
it which binds everything(bloch wall)?
> > > >
> > > > Finally, the last trippy thing about this equation. Try dividing=
it by itself and see what you get.
> > > > I find the result as odd as the multiplication equation. Perhaps=
one of the oddest statements I've ever
> > > > heard in my life, one that made the hair on the back of my neck s=
tand up and made me look up at the sky and
> > > > wonder what the heck is really out there=85what is really going o=
n out there and just how insignificant
> > > > was I, any way=85 one of the oddest statements I ever heard was w=
here Moses asks God who he is and he plainy
> > > > states;
> > > >
> > > > I AM THAT I AM ( a perfect loop? )
> > > >
> > > > 1
> > > > 111,111,111 / 111,111,111 =3D 1
> > > > 111,111,111 * 111,111,111 =3D 12345678987654321
> > > >
> > > > I think my pathetic specimen of a brain just melted and is now ru=
nning liquaceously out my ears
> > > > and onto the floor. Anyone have a towel?
> > > >
> > > > Feedback muchly appreciated
> > > >
> > > > Don J.S. Adams, man did that ever take me a long time to type... =
whew!
> > > > but at least its out of my system now...
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > > > with the body text: leave keelynet
> > > > WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> > > > are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > > with the body text: leave keelynet
> > > WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> > > are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------