NORM - Re: SPOOKY MATH PROVES GOD?

Don J. S, Adams - ( (no email) )
Mon, 07 Sep 1998 12:43:51 -0500

Norman,

What can I say...but WOW! What amazing information! Thanks for sending =
that...
this goes in my MUST HAVE /MUST SAVE folder! I don't feel like such a fr=
eakin
dough brain now.... at least other people more qualified than myself have=
found this
equation and surrounding phenomenon of profound interest. So maybe I'm n=
ot stupid
or crackers? ;>

ITs gonna take some time for me to digest much of the importance behind m=
uch of this
I suspect...but at least I have a whole lot more to go on than I did befo=
re...
I wonder... could this equation be some sort of 'seal' or 'mark' on time =
space
indicating some sort of vibratory origin point? OR does that just sound =
like so much=20
hooey?

Norm I extracted a paragraph from the article you sent and wanted to ask =
you some questions
about it...

>Roger has studied Magic Squares, and is familiar with Keely's 3:9:81
>series. Roger has also discovered that old Scottish Clan Tartans are
>woven in the Magic Square ratios. He has a Windows program that will
>generate Tartan/Magic Square patterns. My thought: A Tartan woven of
>conductive wire might exhibit some interesting effects.

is this software program available? Also you mention weaving conductive =
wires
into Tartan... you mean into the woolen fabrics? What sort of interestin=
g effects
are you thinking of..? HEY WAIT A MINUTE! GREAT ZOIKS!!!! WIRE, WOOL, =
WEAVING...?
You're thinking of some sort of peculiar ORGONE ACCUMULATOR??!!! Aren't =
you? Wow...
with a magic square type configuration to it!!?? WHAT WOULD THAT DO!!!!=
TELL ME
NORM!!! PLEASEEEE!!!! I gotta know, hey I'm Scottish and I'm really up o=
n my Celtic
history, legend etc... I have to know whats goin on here? What the heck=
were my ancestors
up to anyway? I always thought there was something eldritch about tartan=
and celtic
art patterns (very fractal in nature)...like they were trying to tell me =
something ....=20
uh oh...the hair on the back of my neck just started to stand up...ok NOR=
M what=20
can o' worms have we opened here?
Grin...

Norman Wootan wrote:
>=20
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>=20
> Message 8538 DATE/TIME: 09/21/94 09:2=
2
> >From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
> To : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
> Subject: Letter from Sweden
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>=20
> Received a most interesting letter from Roger Natanaelsson in Sweden.
> He ends with, "Since I can't get the answers from Science I have to
> find the answers myself." Amen, Roger.
>=20
> Several points made in the letter:
>=20
> The ALZ&RES file correlates zinc, calcium and aluminum, which Roger
> says have the same lattice structure as copper, silver and gold, and
> which I think should transmute in the same manner, since they are the
> same relative "notes" on the Russell chart of increasing/decreasing
> disintegration.
>=20
> Roger has studied Magic Squares, and is familiar with Keely's 3:9:81
> series. Roger has also discovered that old Scottish Clan Tartans are
> woven in the Magic Square ratios. He has a Windows program that will
> generate Tartan/Magic Square patterns. My thought: A Tartan woven of
> conductive wire might exhibit some interesting effects.
>=20
> Roger also points out that the three 'currents' of 3D Square in Magic
> Squares are required in order to complete a 'stream' of force, ie,
> using the 120Hz example, you have Atom freq. of 14400Hz and Etheric
> freq. of 20736000Hz, but the AMPLITUDE PROPORTION should be equal
> thirds of the stream. He believes that this is why the old vinyl LP
> records were played at 33 1/3 RPM.
>=20
> As a side note, Roger says that my Clan motto is "Vincere Vec Mori",
> which means "To Conquer the Carrier of Death". Apparently there were
> some healers behind those Tartans. Roger says "Here is some feedback
> hopefully building new paths." I couldn't agree more!
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>=20
> Message 8539 DATE/TIME: 09/21/94 09:4=
0
> >From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
> To : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
> Subject: "Roger's Ratio"
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>=20
> Just a note on the previous message. If you use Roger's example of
> applying Magic Square ratios to the Magic Square proportion, in other
> words 3D Square, you get a repeating base ten number system which
> substitutes a decimal for the eighth, or repeating "note" on the
> Russell scale.
>=20
> 33 1/3 times 33 1/3 =3D 1111.11111 times itself gives 1234567.901234...
> I don't know if I can fully grasp the significance of this, but it
> seems to give a mathematical basis for relating Keely's work with
> that of Russell.
>=20
> Base eight as the natural number system? That seems to be the
> implication, based upon nature itself...of course, computers are based
> on this, but maybe much, much more.
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Hi! Don: Hope mthis helps. Norm
>=20
> Norman Wootan wrote:
>=20
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> > Your following message has been delivered to the 161 members of
> > the list KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net at 21:08:32 on 6 Sep 1998.
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> >
> > Hi! Don: Joel McClain brought up this formula back in 1994 on the ol=
d Keelynet BBS
> > message base. I'll look it up for you and post his entire message so=
others can get his original comments as
> > to it's implications. Norm
> >
> > Don J. S, Adams - wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, I'm not a brilliant mathematician but if the following does
> > > not prove that there is a conscious intelligence behind time and
> > > space and everything and that this isnt some grand cosmic joke
> > > played out in a way that says 'yoo hoo, boneheads... I'm heeerrrree=
e'
> > > Then I don't know what would. I am a simple man, and I make many
> > > errors. Both in judgement, rationale, logic and what I should
> > > or should not have for supper tonight. But I cam across this equat=
ion
> > > sometime ago...hidden away in a brief conversation archived on Keel=
ynet.
> > > I think the fellow who had initially discovered or come across it
> > > was an an engineer and if I recall correctly this equation really
> > > spooked him. Another fellow who tried to follow up and explain
> > > this, I felt did a wonderful job at explaing bits and pieces and
> > > contributed small referential 'trivia' regarding transcendental
> > > numbers and such.... but to be honest, to me this all fell flat
> > > and paled in comparison to the growing numb feeling starting in the
> > > pit of my stomach and a muffled shout of 'WHAT THE HE**?" bouncing
> > > around my head. Frankly it occupied my thoughts, this equation..
> > > for some time and I tried to wrap my head aropund it and figure out
> > > why on earth it made me feel so (irrationally I might add) odd.
> > > Like being on a roller coaster and knowing that any second the ride
> > > was about to begin and there was no way I could physically be able
> > > to take it all in so I might as well just hold on for my life....
> > >
> > > Call me crazy but this equation appears to represent an intelligent
> > > finger print of an unknown element which appears must co-exist in a=
dual
> > > state in and out of space-time. Please keep in mind that I fully e=
xpect
> > > to have someone come back and tell me I'm off my rocker, that I'm i=
gnorant,
> > > haven't done my homework, haven't read enough about this topic and =
frankly
> > > should pack up my bags right now...go home and leave such thinking =
to
> > > those who are much more qualified to pontificate and deliberate on =
such
> > > issues. And I'll do this quite gladly...just someone please give
> > > me a reasonable explanation that makes sense fully... and makes thi=
s odd
> > > feeling go away. If some one comes back and quibbles a stock or ad=
hoc
> > > 'text book' answere, likely I'll hush up for now but quietly inside=
I'll
> > > still be thinking, 'Great Zoiks'! This is IT!
> > >
> > > 111,111,111 * 111,111,111 =3D 12345678987654321
> > >
> > > notice the symmetry of the result. This equation could
> > > very likely be called the 'mother of all fractals' the implications
> > > are enormous and it seems almost no one knows about this?
> > > I've seen one engineer just about sh** his pants when he saw this
> > > ...because technically it 'shouldn't exist'? It could very likely =
be
> > > proof of an artificial construct / boundary or strange attractor's =
existence
> > > that was placed into the very fabric of time / space AND into man's
> > > conscious ability to perceive it. The other extremely odd thing is=
that
> > > this equation appears to exhibit multi-dimensional and 'out of time=
'
> > > references and connections. No other numeric string that I know of
> > > does this. One could perceive the quotient as a perfectly ascendin=
g
> > > and descending sine wave. Close the wave and you would have a perf=
ect
> > > sphere or circle. No beginning or ending and yet an Alpha and Omega=
are
> > > present at the same time. Eternity and the now, co-existing. The =
freaky
> > > thing is that this equation appears to be hidden in multiple artifa=
cts some
> > > of which are thousands of years old. How could the ancients have e=
ffectively
> > > computed such numbers and understood the profound implications stor=
ed within?
> > >
> > > One simple example is the 'Star' of David.
> > >
> > > Bisect the star laterally. Note the top section composed of '3' seg=
ments or '111'. Note
> > > how each sub-segment (triangle) has 3 singularities or a collection=
of 3, 3's or 111,111,111.
> > >
> > > The bottom section has the same numeric values. Thus 111,111,111 a=
nd 111,111,111
> > > placed one above the other;
> > >
> > > 111,111,111
> > > 111,111,111
> > >
> > > Now multiply to get eternity and the now. The moment and forever. =
I could go on and on
> > > about this very strange equation... there appears to be connections=
between this and magnetism
> > > and other various aspects of physical reality. In magnetism we hav=
e the '3', North and South
> > > Polar and the ZPE type equivalent or void, bloch wall dividing the =
polarities.
> > >
> > > Also in various cultures and religions there is a representation of=
'trinity' type segments in the
> > > perception of the deity. Hindu's have 3 major gods who represent a=
singularity of ultimate
> > > core consciousness. Each 'segment' representing different 'polarit=
ies'.
> > >
> > > Where Noth polar represents contracting energy, South Polar expandi=
ng energy and the Bloch
> > > Wall - origin point ?
> > >
> > > Brahma creates (South Polar?), Vishnu preserves (North Polar), and =
Shiva destroys or makes
> > > Void (Bloch wall?).
> > >
> > > In Christianity you have three in one again, 111. God the Father (=
North Polar?) maintains reality, God the
> > > Son (South Polar?) expands between God and man, and the Holy Spirit=
which binds everything(bloch wall)?
> > >
> > > Finally, the last trippy thing about this equation. Try dividing i=
t by itself and see what you get.
> > > I find the result as odd as the multiplication equation. Perhaps o=
ne of the oddest statements I've ever
> > > heard in my life, one that made the hair on the back of my neck sta=
nd up and made me look up at the sky and
> > > wonder what the heck is really out there=85what is really going on =
out there and just how insignificant
> > > was I, any way=85 one of the oddest statements I ever heard was whe=
re Moses asks God who he is and he plainy
> > > states;
> > >
> > > I AM THAT I AM ( a perfect loop? )
> > >
> > > 1
> > > 111,111,111 / 111,111,111 =3D 1
> > > 111,111,111 * 111,111,111 =3D 12345678987654321
> > >
> > > I think my pathetic specimen of a brain just melted and is now runn=
ing liquaceously out my ears
> > > and onto the floor. Anyone have a towel?
> > >
> > > Feedback muchly appreciated
> > >
> > > Don J.S. Adams, man did that ever take me a long time to type... wh=
ew!
> > > but at least its out of my system now...
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > > with the body text: leave keelynet
> > > WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> > > are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > with the body text: leave keelynet
> > WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> > are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------