Re: acupuncture point devices.

Don J. S, Adams - ( (no email) )
Mon, 31 Aug 1998 18:23:44 -0500

yup I've heard of it... my family doctor uses it back home in Canada....
only problem he has is that the filters are rather bulky and to do any half
decent diagnosis means bundling or stacking a bunch together... rather time
consuming too.... but I do think there is something to it... now if only
there was a way to utilize it in a more expedient manner?

Steve Meeker wrote:
>
> I have been watching this thread for awhile and now need to do a couple
> of pennies worth. Acupuncture, specifically microsystems [ear,
> hand,etc] are my biz. I also design and make ear tools for
> prfessionals. I sell a couple of devices, but that is not my main
> focus.
> There are basically 2 types of finders [treatment types later] the
> chinese and french. every one out there regaldless of name is a
> variation of these. they are, with varying degrees of sophistication
> ohmeters. they measure resistance on a point. HOW they do that is the
> difference.
> the chinese [developed in china late 50-60's] is the most seen, and is
> the types discussed on this list. the acuhealth sold all over the world
> is a great example. it has one small electrode that you touch to the
> skin, and a metal plate on the device to complete the circuit. these
> things can be extremely crude, or more upscale with a "squelch knob" to
> set base resistance, because evrybody and body part is different. think
> of these as circumcised units.
> the uncircumcised or french [deveolped in Lyon in the 50's] has a rod
> inside of a insulated tube, both on a spring, and measures extremely
> fine areas [= and - close together] instead of the whole body area like
> the chinese. there is a handhold for the patint, but this is a BIAS to
> set the machine to zero, because this machine measures both + and-
> points wheras the french has only one polarity. this is much more
> therapeutic as the chinese do not measure the chronic focus of disease
> and therfore do not have as good as success.
> the other differences are that the frnch machine has 8 frequencies that
> have to do with tissue types [nerves, muscle, brain, etc] because each
> cell type has a firing frequency. the chinese either has a fixed factory
> freq or a potentiometer that has a poor readout.
> the chinese machines are very inexpensive, the french expensive.
> I use both daily. one is fast and easy, the other much more effective
> but slower. chinese machines can hurt during treatment phase, but I use
> needles, gold/silver or lasers so I dont use that phase of the chinese.
> when i have a frail, sensitive person or a child, i always use the
> french.
> A lot of times failure comes from the machine hurting you, not being
> appropriate or not being trained. it takes a lot more than an ear
> chart-most of them are 20-30 years old -kind of like using a TI-44 to
> run Windows.
> I get immediate results especially with pain and joint problems, even
> using the cheap stuff. It does not last as long, but it will work.
> I have run into and keep running into variations of these machines,
> there are many on the market under many names. some work better than
> others, and you can spend alot of money on crap. the big thing is
> training to use this--that makes the difference.
>
>
> --
> Steve Meeker, Dipl.Ac.,L.Ac.
> Hollywood Clinic
> 1804 ne 25
> Portland, Oregon 97212
> 503.281.3835
> board certified in Acupuncture[NCCA]
> board certified in Pain Management [AAPM]
> http://www.eardoc.com
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------