This is going to be hard to believe. I just fowarded Jed Rothwell's "Dennis
Lee's Lament" (from Vortexb-L) to Professor Searl. Jed's message is a good
account of how investors interpret behavior of inventors when evaluating
their prototype for purchase. Right now, the technical people he's working
with, and are buying his books, are attracting R&D funding but they are not
sharing the money, nor are they consulting enough with, Professor Searl.
They were able to make a roller that will orbit a plate, but there are
stress cracks in the material and they will have to go up a square for
better strength. I wrote that perhaps he would be interested in Jed's
businessperson perspective message. I said that it would be an honor if he
might consider hanging out on our email forums a bit (Vortex-L, Freenrgy,
KeelyNet, etc.). Then I decided to check for new email one more time... I
read your last message right after I click the send button. Personally I
kinda respect Professor Searl and I'm concerned about the vein they pulled
out of his leg. But even if I didn't like the guy, I would reserve my
opinion until I had read everything he had to say about his technology.
There are (God willing) 20+ volumes that are in the planning to be published
in the series. The situation you describe might be compared to a second
grade reading level trying to understand Shakespear. I'll buy what you got
if you don't want Professor Searl's books. Since they are used, what do you
think will be a fair discount?
At 03:48 PM 8/28/98 -0500, you wrote:
>This reminds me of a time long ago and forgotten by many. It was after
>school in 1963 and I was watching "Wagon Train" at Darlene Krusinski's. I
>didn't know then how things worked but when I watched the wheel it went
>forward, and then backwards. Little could I ascertain that the projector
>was showing phasing interactions. Incredible as it sounds over a quarter of
>a century later while asleep during a repeat episode of wagon train a
>bird,precisely a robin came to my window and repeatedly pecked until I had
>awakened.
There you go; this could be God himself trying to tell us to cool it! ;)
>In that precise moment was the episode that made me remember what
>was said. It sort of came back to haunt me.But in a realization is the fact
>that magnetic imprints must surely follow suit with rotation. If the
>frequency is sufficiently high in cohered fields such a multi-pole
>wagon-wheel illusion imprint could be made on a rotating part.
I have produced a ceramic disk magnet with what looks like a bubble under an
iron filings type of magetic field viewer. So I remembered what Bob Grey
said about perpendicular forces that magnetic bubbles produced when exposed
to an ambient opposing magnetic field. I pushed a similar disk magnet with a
normal field pattern right over the treated magnet which was laying flat on
the table. Seeing the bubble magnet scoot right out the side was a
surprising and memorable moment! Am I sure that this is a demonstration of a
key effect of the Searl device? I'm optomistic but there are no conclusions
yet, just a possible indication. I do think that the process was fun, and
exciting though. I discovered this accidentally while I was trying to
determine the magnetic polarity of a pulse from a coil.
>Dreams are
>hard to come by especially from birds. Maybe this is a bird brained
>idea.Nevertheless I always remember the sweet times with Darlene in my
>young age of misunderstanding.
>
It was such an adventure back then, wasn't it? :)
Dennis
You're in the 'zone' when: time flies by - following your nose - in focus -
figuring things out - not worried about anything - having a great time -
getting great stuff done - without really trying. The creative artistic
state? Could (should?) the goal be the process?
Tall Ships
http://pw1.netcom.com/~atech/tallship.html