Re: Alternatives for inventors' disease

Jerry Wayne Decker ( jwdatwork@yahoo.com )
Tue, 25 Aug 1998 13:32:45 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Folks!

Better yet;

http://www.keelynet.com/share.htm

http://www.keelynet.com/pop.htm

It must be freely shared and the world will surely be appreciative if
they know who to blame, woops, I meant credit...

---"Clyde Knight Jr." wrote:
>
> To: Bernd Warken
>
> There is a way to protect ideas, inventions and innovations prior to
patents
> and prototypes. There are many companies out there that offer similar
> services. But the prices vary greatly. Intellectual Technology a
subsidiary
> of Knite Enterprises Inc., offer our services at competitive rates.
Please
> visit us by clicking on the following hypertlink -
> http://www.angelfire.com/biz/kniteenterprises/inventor.html
>
> Then check the competition and compare prices and services. Many
offer and
> charge individual inventors for information that is realistically
filler
> information - in other words information that is readily available
for free
> from other sources if one had the time to research for it. Knite
Enterprises
> Inc., charges the individual inventor for information that is
pertinent to
> assisting the individual inventor in protecting their concepts. After
> visiting Us on the WWW you will then be in a position to make an
informed
> decision. Thanks in advance for your interest in Knite Enterprises
Inc.
>
> Warmest regards,
>
> Clyde Knight Jr.
> Owner
>
>
> --Original Message----
> From: bwarken@wuff.mayn.de <bwarken@wuff.mayn.de>
> To: freenrg-l@eskimo.com <freenrg-l@eskimo.com>
> Date: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 5:39 AM
> Subject: Alternatives for inventors' disease
>
>
> >From: William Beaty <billb@eskimo.com>
> >
> >> All fail, and it may APPEAR that evil forces have suppressed
them. But
> the
> >> only really evil force I see throughout f/e history is inventor
secrecy.
> >
> >Wow, you really hit the spot. Great Mail :-)
> >
> >> Is there a way to stay secret, yet get a successful product out?
Maybe.
> >> But what if there is not? What if inventor secrecy causes other
factors
> to
> >> become unbeatable? How many lost discoveries must occur before
people
> start
> >> to see secrecy as a problem?
> >
> >Well, how about starting a new style? I think Beat'em or Beaty
sounds like
> a
> >good name for a new project on open inventions. And eskimo.com
reminds me
> of
> >penguines, the symbol for Linux.
> >
> >> Eventually what will happen is that a scientist will stumble
across an ou
> >> phenomenon. That scientist will publish. Others will replicate.
The
> world
> >> will enter a new age, and the accolades will go (rightly) to
science.
> >> Modern science might suffer from closemindedness and
paradigm-worship,
> but
> >> scientists have discovered the key to progress: turning away from
the
> >> secrecy which inventors cling to so fiercely.
> >
> >To get away from the old patent tracks, an alternative scheme for
> protecting
> >an invention without limiting its usage has to be found.
> >
> >Such schemes exist for free software. There is the international
notion of
> >copyright which secures all rights to the author or a group of
developers.
> In
> >a second step, the author can put it under some free license scheme
like
> the
> >GNU copyleft to ensure unlimited free usage of the program except
that this
> >free usage may not be limited.
> >
> >Something similar should exist or be created for inventions of free
energy
> >devices. We need a cheap and easy protecting mechanism for
avoiding misuse
> of
> >inventions, but without limiting the free public usage. Patents
are not
> >suitable, and very expensive and time-consuming anyway. An optimal
scheme
> >would be something that prevents that someone else can patent the
invention
> or
> >otherwise block a free development.
> >
> >Is there a patent lawyer or law student or someone with legal
experience
> who
> >could check for such possibilities (without being paid for this
> information)?
> >
> >Maybe, the legal situation in Northern America with respect to
> international
> >laws will suit most. European countries are in a process of
transformation
> >into a common union. Common laws are in development and have not
yet been
> >tested.
> >
> >I am neither a lawyer nor learnt in laws, but my experience with
freeware
> >showed me that one has to be very careful with using the right
legal stuff.
> >
> >Bernd Warken (bwarken@mayn.de)
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com