Re: Mine format(yuck !); Rename Attachments to the list

Norman Wootan ( normw@fastlane.net )
Tue, 25 Aug 1998 15:14:07 -0500

Hi Jerry and all other List members. Sorry about the Mine format. Didn't
know about it before now so please accept my sincere apologies. I guess you
are right about people out there not being interested in "free energy". Why
are they subscribing to the "KeelyNet" for I thought that was what we are
all about. From now on no one will hear from me unless I am asked a
specific question. My intent was to show how, no mater how good your
intentions are in this arena, you will get stepped on. Again, I'm sorry
about the post and it won't happen again. Norm

Jerry Wayne Decker wrote:

> Hi ryb et al!
>
> Because of the new server hosting the KeelyNet list and based on
> discussions with Dan about uploading images and attachments to the
> database, he assured me it wouldn't be a problem with space.
>
> As a result of this, I removed the file size and attachment
> limitations in the guidelines.
>
> Now, I personally don't think it is a good idea to send in large files
> which should more appropriately be privately forwarded to those
> interested.
>
> Nothing is more time consuming than picking up your mail and getting a
> host of unsolicited emails with attachments that take forever to
> download. I just want to get the gist of the messages and move on.
>
> Same for capturing an entire page from a URL that is currently online
> and which only would need a short section to clarify what was being
> said.
>
> To my understanding this is making people read material that they
> might not be interested in by shoving it in their mailbox.
>
> At least with limits, what is posted to the 150+ people on the list
> will be emails containing only a synopses of the information hopefully
> with additional links that let people find out more if they are so
> inclined.
>
> So, as a matter of courtesy, I think people appreciate informative
> posts with urls, relevant excertps and an offer of additional info
> should they be interested.
>
> Perhaps I should add that to the Guidelines as netiquette?
>
> ---ryb wrote:
> >
> > Posting a mime format in mailing list that can usually only accept
> TEXT
> > is well,deplorable...Sur wish that people would reconsider this option
> > and just say that those that want it,they will e0mail to them the
> > required infos...
> >
> > Any altrnative ways have been suggested to divert coruse of
> Hurricanes(I
> > am thibnkign of Bonnie);also ways to harness the energy produced by
> > such a hurricane.I think I read tht Reich and Tesla(?) did some
> research
> > into that areas ?
> >
> > I remember seeing in a French magazien-it as a publication for
> > youngsters,called SPIROU, I believe,about 40 yrs ago,around 1956,at
> the
> > time of the International Expo being held at Bruxelles,Belgium..In any
> > event,that chap in his early 30's(?) was receiving TV stations from
> all
> > over the world..Remmebr,NO satellite up then except the infamous
> Sputnik
> > put up in 1957 by th Russian followe by an American one a few months
> > later.The 1st Communication satellite was TELSTAR put up in 62 or 67
> > ?(in the early yearss of the Vietnam conflict infos about the war were
> > put on a plane and sent to the US...images thus arrived about 12-18hrs
> > later on our TV screen).
> >
> > Okay,sorry if I digressed a bit..Hence this chap.a sort of hobbyist
> > electrician was able to get TV reception from mnay foreign
> > countries-,simply by putting up an antenna and then
> > have it zizag in the sky until he was able to get reception fo
> other TV
> > stations..His antenna was thus capting TV waves.It was about 20-30
> feet
> > high, experts stated that it was impossible yet journalists had taken
> > photos of him receiving TV stations from Asia,America,etc..This chap
> > could not explain it..The article concluded that one day every one
> would
> > be able to get TV programs from all over the world..The hobbyist was
> > trying to figure out a way to standardize his research and develop a
> > commercial antenna..
> > I remember reading later(in 62-63 ?) that a sort of working prototype
> > was in fact made but that commercial interest in the device was
> > mitigated and then satellite TV transmission began in around 67 and
> the
> > Belgium Ministry of technology(?) had tried to interest the
> > industry..Guess it was never commercialized,if ever,on a grand
> scale...I
> > wonder if BIG $$$ vested interests did not stifle that
> > discovery/technology ?
> > If some pundits are right-this fall,micro-meteorites are supposed
> to
> > create havoc with the numerous satellites in space and maybe as they
> > are disabled,that technology will resurface once again ?
> >
> > Yours,ryb....
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > with the body text: leave keelynet
> > WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> > are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------