Fw: Wanted; Updates on Meyer and Newman
Meat Truck ( (no email) )
Sun, 9 Aug 1998 07:01:47 -0500
----------
> From: Meat Truck <mnorris@akron.infi.net>
> To: michael randall <mrand910@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Wanted; Updates on Meyer and Newman
> Date: Sunday, August 09, 1998 6:54 AM
>
> I feel sorry for people that keep sending requests for updates on Meyer
and
> Newman but have not taken the time to change the subject for the rest of
us
> 144. Now the leaders of this conspiracy must come face to face with the
> fact that sooner or later they should go by the guidelines established by
> Jerry, even though he may be a co-conspirator. So without further adieu I
> will make the following commentary
> > From: michael randall <mrand910@yahoo.com>
> > To: mnorris@akron.infi.net
> > Subject: Re: Overunity --- Not!
> > Date: Sunday, August 16, 1998 12:28 PM
> >
> > Now while it is true that my brother is a political prisoner,and I have
> gained access to his computer,this does by no means indicate that I am
> proficient in its use. His handle was Meat Truck so I am working under my
> brother. Of course he will be out soon under his UCC guidelines (we
hope).
> I have of course made many mistakes in chopping things up so lets give
this
> letter a try.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---Meat Truck <mnorris@akron.infi.net> wrote:
> >
> > No transformer was necessary. I am
> > > applying
> > > this work towards the investigation of S. Meyer HV electrolysis
> > claims
> > > and have began
> > > work on a message board to post results. In the complete theory that
> > I am
> > > working on
> > > 4 phases, and not just 2 will be used. Will post message board soon
> > as it
> > > may not interest
> > > all the group. Sincere in the work, H. Norris
mnorris@akron.infi.net
> > I
> >
> > The only other mention of the 180 deg. phase shift in a TC was by a
> > researcher named Eric Dollard of Borderland research back in 1986. It
> > was very complex and to my knowledge a never reproduced experiment.
> > If you solved the problem without a transformer then you have broken
> > new ground in this area. Ball lightning and plasma work was claimed
> > to be produced.
> >(What I presented was an idea to produce binary series resonant rise of
> voltage without the use of a transformer to make a demonstration of
> miniature lightening at very small power input from 110 ac. @ 10 watts)
> > Meyer's hydrolysis work was also interesting in the fact that it was
> > demonstrated and it showed unusual features that to this day no one
> > has reproduced. Like his claim that electrons must not flow, to use
> > energy in the conventional hydrolysis, but only voltage was to be
> > used. The report of an early experiment that showed a glass of water
> > being atomizied using no current and the process being cool to the
> > touch always fascinated me.
> >(I am in an understanding of how Meyer quotes the use of a resonant
choke
> circuit. I know what it can do and what it cant by experimentation. In my
> replication efforts a problem developed in that the instruments used to
> record the desired capacitance failed to give a reading for the finished
> water capacitor.This makes the whole proposition something like shooting
in
> the dark.)
> > I've experimented with Brown's Gas to find ou energy output. This
> > Australian findings using the Joe Energy Cell looks promising also.
> >( The application of rectified high frequency pulsing from the binary
> resonant system promises to be a more efficient generation of browns gas.
> As per past note I am building this for business purposes)
> > Regards, Michael Randall
> > PS thanx for the reply Mike, I was wondering what would happen if I
sent
> the reply to All on the top section of the computer if it would be sent
to
> the discussion groups, but otherwise regard this as a reply to you.
Please
> send your e mail address fo future correspondence. Sincerly H Norris
> mnorris@akron.infi.net
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > DO YOU YAHOO!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com