Re: Anyone has Updates on S. Meyer,Newman...?
Norman Wootan ( normw@fastlane.net )
Mon, 17 Aug 1998 17:14:09 -0500
Hi! Mike: I must apologize about the routing of my reply to your original message to me. I should have clicked on "reply to all" for I am guilty of creating some of the one side of the conversation messages. I hate them for everyone is sitting there saying "what the hell is going on and why can't we see what is being said". Please post my comments so all can see them for there is more interest in this "Clem" project than I realized. The development of
an industrial product while studying the "Clem" can certainly provide the funding needed. I have done a complete Patent and literature search world wide and there is nothing even remotely close to my idea. You know these thing sort of "pop out of the blue" while you are in deep thought as to how a process really works. Everyone must understand that this idea does not in any way infringe on the "Clem Family" rights to the technology. It covers an
entirely new area of application totally removed from free energy or a motor. Jerry- when Mike post my comments you will see how this confusion got started. Sorry-bout-that. I must agree with Jerry in that we should wait on this project until Jerry is in a position to lead it. This has been Jerry's project from the beginning and I must tell all of you that I would not have known about the Clem Device had it not been for Jerrys posting it to the old BBS
and the many conversations we have had about it.
Mike Sangrey wrote:
> > Hi Norm!
> >
> > Clem is the real thing and I don't really have many questions about it
> > at this point, beyond mechanical arrangements, I feel I understand the
> > operation and that's why it all got posted so many years ago as it
> > offered promise, MUCH promise...then when the family contacted me and
> > clarified some errors in the story and verified that it DID work, it
> > simply cemented my intent that CLEM will be rebuilt.
> >
>
> OK. So what would have to be done to do this? I'm thinking in terms of a plan. Is there a way we could take this big problem -- building a Clem engine -- and break it into smaller parts. I would very much like to see some creative brainstorming on this list about what tasks would need to be done. If we get these tasks out in the open and people will see where their abilities can be applied. IMO, we need a certain critical mass to boot strap this.
>
> We're engineering types here. This is a real world problem. What's the real world solution?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------