Chris Gupta
At 12:17 PM 8/16/98 -0600, you wrote:
>Someone wrote me a letter earlier in this week about the possible influence
>of the earths geomagnetic field on the MOR. Differences in the field
>strength from place to place may be expressed as a ratio which could be
>multiplied times the MOR to provide for a correction factor. I asked the
>author of the letter to post this idea - but since this hasn't been posted -
>I'll do so now.
>
>He gave as an example Albuquerque with a B field of .51406 , the B field in
>Titusville Florida of .48274 gauss. The ratio is .939 or 1.065 depending on
>which way the correction factor would need to be figured.
>
>So in an ideal scenario 2128 in Albuquerque would be either 2266 or 1998 in
>Titusville.The device of course does generate a very small magnetic field
>that needs to be factored into the local field strenth to determine the
>correction factor. So the variation should not be as great as indicated, and
>this seems to correlate well with some peoples findings. For example the
>small skin cancer on my arm responded at 2116 Hz. This would give a
>correction factor of 0.9945 to the 2128.
>
>I have been searching the web for more info about the geomagnetic field and
>I believe that this field is a key player in the devices operational
>attributes. As most of you with devices are aware, the device is highly
>sensitive to just about everything having to do with changes in the
>environment. The time of day, the weather, the seasons, the temperature, and
>so on all affect the device. Geomagnetic forces are affected in similar
manners.
>
>Variations in local field strength could easily account for some of the
>operational discrepencies between devices - all other things kept equal.
>This would also account for why some days the device will work and some days
>it will not work. A local significant shift in the geomagnetic field might
>create a shift in the MOR.
>
>The good news is that geomagnetic data has been collected for so long that
>one can actually predict what the local geomagnetic field strength will be
>in the future. Tables are available that extend out to the year 2000.
>
>The device of course does generate a very small magnetic field that needs to
>be factored into the local field strenth to determine the correction factor.
>I've been looking about the web for a simple easy to use program for
>determination of the magnetic field and haven't yet found one. Does anyone
>on the list know of such a program or site?
>
>I've downloaded a couple of programs from some sites, but they want a large
>amount of data entered in complex form in order to produce field strentgh.
>There has to be a site somewhere that gives sort of a general reading for
>ones area.
>
>As it is now one has to enter the longitutude and latitude and so on for
>your area. Would be nice to have a site where one just plugs in say San
>Diego at 5 pm and get a general reading.
>
>
>Jim
>
>