Re: Geomagnetic Fields
mindtech@nor.com.au
Wed, 19 Aug 1998 11:02:03 +1000
>>So in an ideal scenario 2128 in Albuquerque would be either 2266 or 1998 in
>>Titusville.The device of course does generate a very small magnetic field
>>that needs to be factored into the local field strenth to determine the
>>correction factor. So the variation should not be as great as indicated, and
>>this seems to correlate well with some peoples findings. For example the
>>small skin cancer on my arm responded at 2116 Hz. This would give a
>>correction factor of 0.9945 to the 2128.
>>
Are you aware of the possible connection between this and cyclotron
resonances?
Peter Nielsen