Re: Anyone has Updates on S. Meyer,Newman...?

Bill McMurtry ( weber@powerup.com.au )
Mon, 17 Aug 1998 12:53:48 +1000

Hi Mike,

For a start I'd like to say that I believe it would be prudent to first
discover if there is any interest amongst this discussion group (besides
yourself, Jerry, Norm, and myself) in pursuing this matter. Personally I
don't see much point in gearing up towards a project funding such as this
if out of the 142 members of this discussion list there are only 4
interested people. I for one would dearly like to here from the other
members of the list BEFORE getting too far out the gate.

As far as hooking up a Clem engine a generator, I'd just like to see the
machine self run at this stage - under no load. I'm sure if this could be
accomplished there would be virtually no problem in finding funds for
applications projects.

As a matter of interest at this stage I'd like to send out a call to all
those on the list interested in this project: Could everyone please post
your response to the idea of contributing to this project. If we could
simply get an idea of the viability of this proposal we'de be better
positioned to understand if it is a possible avenue to take. I have started
a new thread, "Clem Engine Project" to discover exactly what we are dealing
with in terms of possible contribution funding.

Jerry, I understand you have something on at the moment that potentially
limits your commitment to such an endeavor. I like your reference to " The
Fly". Applying this concept to people (as components in a system) can be
just as viable, as I'm sure you're aware.

Regards, Bill.

At 21:21 16/08/98 -0300, Mike Sangrey wrote:
>
>Norman Wootan believes he has a lot of the details worked out, though
nothing
>built yet. He has sent me an email to that effect. I would have quoted
that
>to the list, but I have a personal policy to not do that unless he permits
me.
>
>I would like to see us proceed as follows:
> 1. Norm, post to the list what you have.
> 2. Jerry, set up a place to organize the information. I'd recommend not
>stuffing every little thing in that place. I'd like to see everything that
>would provide a complete picture, but leave out the fluff. Allow (and
>encourage) questions from the list to dictate the level of detail.
> 3. I'd really like to see a plan and budget. This may seem like so much
>bureaucratic overhead, but it does several things. The structure it would
>provide would give direction and speed. It would also help to determine
what
>documentation should be saved in the place mentioned in two above.
>
>Lastly, I'd like to see a commitment a long these lines: The Clem engine
>would be hooked up to a generator that would power a home (or more). The
>money savings from no electric bill would be pumped back into the project
>over, say, a five year period decreasing by $/5 each year. That money would
>be used to build another which would be utilized in like fashion. And so
>forth. Simply put, the energy production would fund the project.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>