[snip]
>The voltage pulses applied across the water can be very high, and it is this
>voltage that must be used in determining power consumed in the cracking
>process. The higher the voltage pulses across the water, the lower will be
>the current readings for a given gas flow rate. With pulses on the order
>of close to a couple of thousand volts across the water electrodes the
>current can be very small - yet the power consumed may remain quite high,
>eg: 2KV @ 0.1 Amps average = 200 Watts. If you were looking at the supply
>voltage of, say, 20 Volts and multiplied that by the 0.1 Amps average you
>would get a false power calculation of only 2 Watts input! How easy it is
>to be fooled by apparently convincing demonstrations. Without wanting to
>sound cynical here, I must say also how easy it is to push a magicians
>trick to the point of people (even the educated) handing you capital
>investment for your demonstrations.
Interesting, but it does not explain why only 2 watts was being measured at
the battery end? Are you saying the ammeter was not able to respond fast
enough to show the true amperage? if not one could conclude that other 198
watts was coming form ZPE or something?
>
>This reminds me of a demonstration I saw at the '94 symposium on new energy
>at Denver. A fellow, can't remember his name, was demonstrating his
>motor/generator setup to a large group of interested people. It consisted
>of a disk rotor fitted with magnets and was powered by a D.C. motor
>connected directly to the drive shaft. There were a number of coils fixed
>around the rotor, induced by the rotor magnets, designed to output to a
>lightbulb load. He switch on the drive motor and allowed the rotor to come
>to maximum RPM (around 3000). At this point he switched on the load to the
>pickup coils. Amazingly, the lightbulb lit up AND the rotor picked up
>considerable additional speed. As he increased the load, the rotor would
>speed up further. He claimed this to be an amazing example of free energy
>extraction at work! I had seen this effect many times in the past while
>working with this kind of motor/generator arrangement and knew the cause of
>the rotor speeding up when placed under load. It is simply magnetic
>decoupling, between the magnets and the coils, which effectively frees the
>rotor as the coils are loaded. The effect can be enhanced with the addition
>of capacitors across the output coils.
I don't get this either. If additional speed is being generated with a
higher load then what is supplying the energy to do this? Is the rise in
speed temporary and coming form the stored inertia and comes to a stand
still after a while? or is continuos? Sorry for the dum questions I am sure
I am missing something.
Thx for your help
Chris Gupta
>I explained all this to the demonstrator quite clearly, but he seemed
unhappy to accept my position and
>asked me not to tell anyone about the secret of his machine! Now I don't
>believe this fellow was fraudulently trying to trick people. He was
>genuinely of the opinion that he had discovered something of great value to
>the free energy movement. The problem was that so did most of the people
>who were witness to his demonstration and wordy claims. The point: Seeing
>is not believing. Hearing is not believing. Understanding is the only safe
>path through the dark woods.
>
>Hey Jerry, what project would you work on given the time and resorces?
>
>Regards, Bill.
>
[snip]